Question

In: Statistics and Probability

The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to...

The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to determine the effect of changing the process by which insurance claims are approved. The goal was to improve policyholder satisfaction by speeding up the process and eliminating some non-value-added approval steps in the process. The response measured was the average time required to approve and mail all claims initiated in a week. The new procedure was tested for 12 weeks, and the results were compared to the process performance for the 12 weeks prior to instituting the change.

Table: Insurance Claim Approval Times (days)

Old Process Elapsed Time New Process Elapsed Time
Week Week
1 31.7 13 24
2 27 14 25.8
3 33.8 15 31
4 30 16 23.5
5 32.5 17 28.5
6 33.5 18 25.6
7 38.2 19 28.7
8 37.5 20 27.4
9 29 21 28.5
10 31.5 22 25.2
11 38.6 23 24.5
12 39.3 24 23.5

Use the date in the table above and answer the following questions in the space provided below:

  1. What was the average effect of the process change? Did the process average increase or decrease and by how much?
  2. Analyze the data using the regression model y = b0 + b1 x, where y = time to approve and mail a claim (weekly average), x = 0 for the old process, and x = 1 for the new process.
  3. How does this model measure the effect of the process change?
  4. How much did the process performance change on the average? (Hint: Compare the values of b1 and the average of new process performance minus the average of the performance of the old process.)

Solutions

Expert Solution

(a) The mean elapsed time is found for old process is 33.55 and for new process is 26.35 and the difference in mean are found statistically significant as pvalue is less than 0.05 i.e. 0.000 in table1. The elapsed time is decreasing by the new process and the difference is 7.15

(b) The regreaaion equation is found to predict the elapsed time for old and new process is

Elapsed time = 33.55 - 7.2 * type of process

If the process is new then type of process = 1 otherwise 0

The effect of the process is significantly impact on the elapsed time as the pvalue is less than 0.05 i.e. 0.000

The process performance change on the average is - 7.2 which is the difference in mean of old and new process elapsed time.


Related Solutions

The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to...
The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to determine the effect of changing the process by which insurance claims are approved. The goal was to improve policyholder satisfaction by speeding up the process and eliminating some non-value-added approval steps in the process. The response measured was the average time required to approve and mail all claims initiated in a week. The new procedure was tested for 12 weeks, and the results were...
The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to...
The data in the table below is from a study conducted by an insurance company to determine the effect of changing the process by which insurance claims are approved. The goal was to improve policyholder satisfaction by speeding up the process and eliminating some non-value-added approval steps in the process. The response measured was the average time required to approve and mail all claims initiated in a week. The new procedure was tested for 12 weeks, and the results were...
Consider the data in the following table, obtained from a cohort study conducted by Iso and...
Consider the data in the following table, obtained from a cohort study conducted by Iso and colleagues [Isa H, Date C, Yamamoto A, et al. Smoking cessation and mortality from cardiovascular disease among Japanese men and women. The JACC study. Am J Epidmeiol. 2005;161(2):170-179.]. Total Cardiovascular Disease According to Smoking Status Disease Current Smoker Cases Person-years Yes 882 — 220,965 No 673 — 189,254 Calculate the rate ratio and corresponding 95% confidence interval for these data. Express your answer to...
The data below are from a study conducted by a consumer research group on the fuel...
The data below are from a study conducted by a consumer research group on the fuel efficiency (rated based on city miles per gallon) of the 30 top-selling U.S. automobiles. 23 20 16 13 34 27 24 10 16 12 34 26 14 31 15 12 16 36 18 22 15 19 28 38 10 16 14 23 19 44 1. Enter the data into a spreadsheet. Be sure to clearly label and neatly format your spreadsheet. 2. Calculate the...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below.      Social      Brain      Social      Brain Subject      distress      activity Subject      distress      activity 1 1.22 −0.055   8 2.18 0.027 2...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below.      Social      Brain      Social      Brain Subject      distress      activity Subject      distress      activity 1 1.22 −0.055 8 2.20 0.028 2...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below. Social Brain Social Brain Subject distress activity Subject distress activity 1 1.28 −0.055 8 2.20 0.025 2 1.87 −0.040 9 2.58 0.027 3 1.08 −0.026...
The data in the table below were collected from a repeated‑measures study of muscle growth related...
The data in the table below were collected from a repeated‑measures study of muscle growth related to exercise. There were 8 people in the study altogether! They each got the four exercise conditions. Fill in the table below Interval training Aerobic exercise Weight training No exercise SSwithin for the study SSwithin for each group 36 18 26 15 95 Source SS DF MS F Between groups Within groups 95 ----- ---- Between persons 16 ----- ---- Error ---- Total 112...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below.      Social      Brain      Social      Brain Subject      distress      activity Subject      distress      activity 1 1.20 −0.055 8 2.22 0.028 2...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain."...
The table below gives data from a study that shows that social exclusion causes "real pain." That is, activity in the area of the brain that responds to physical pain goes up as distress from social exclusion goes up. The scatterplot for this data shows a moderately strong linear relationship. The data are given below.      Social      Brain      Social      Brain Subject      distress      activity Subject      distress      activity 1 1.20 −0.055 8 2.22 0.028 2...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT