In: Accounting
Frogs, Inc. Part #2
Using Departmental Overhead Rates
Goal:
To compare plantwide and departmental overhead allocation
methods.
Information:
Frogs, Inc. computes manufacturing overhead using either direct
labor hours or direct material dollars so the owners decided to
reject the parking lot project at this time. However, based on your
training and education, you are sure that the company has made a
mistake and should have accepted the new job.
You have decided to explain the benefits of switching to the departmental method using separate rates for all four departments using last year’s data and comparing these cost analysis with the plantwide rates already shown. You want to explain the benefits of accepting this new job to the owners.
The following table represents information about the four departments’ numbers from last year: Department Information
Concrete Casting |
Design Department |
Engineering |
Owners |
|
Projects per year |
1,000 frog statues |
200 |
200 |
200 |
Direct materials |
$62,000 |
$10,000 |
$900,000 |
$1,000 |
Direct Labor Costs |
5 Casters $208,000 |
6 Designers $436,800 |
3 Sr. and 5 Jr. $447,200 |
2 Owners $187,200 |
Direct Labor Hours |
10,400 |
12,480 |
16,640 |
4,160 |
Totals for the year |
$270,000 |
$446,800 |
$1,377,200 |
$188,200 |
All projects use both the Design Department and the Engineering Departments in addition to the Concrete Casting Department and the Owner’s work. All employees including the owners work the standard 2,080 hours each year. The total direct labor hours for the year are 43,680.
Frogs, Inc. Page 5 of 13
Design Department |
Engineering Department |
Concrete Casting |
Owners |
|
Overhead Costs |
||||
Setup Costs |
$20,000 |
$60,000 |
$10,000 |
$3,000 |
Utilities |
$10,000 |
$15,000 |
$5,000 |
$3,000 |
Equipment Fees |
$0 |
$100,000 |
$5,000 |
$5,000 |
Permits |
$5,000 |
$5,000 |
$0 |
$5,000 |
Travel to job site |
$5,000 |
$20,000 |
$3,000 |
$5,000 |
Total |
$40,000 |
$200,000 |
$23,000 |
$21,000 |
Required:
1 Compare and contrast the plantwide method with the departmental method of computing manufacturing overhead rates.
2 Compute the overhead cost per unit using direct labor hours as the plantwide cost driver.
3 Compute the overhead cost per unit using the departmental method. Use the projects per year as the cost driver for the Design Department and the Owners. Use the number of
concrete frogs made for the Concrete Casting Department and the direct labor hours for
the Engineering Department. You will have 4 department rates.
4 Using your department rates for each department computed in question 3 and the DM and
DL costs computed in Part 1, calculate the total cost of the project.
5 Now, compute the overhead rates using the POHR for direct material dollars used ($0.70)
for Concrete Casting. Compute the POHR’s for the Design Department, the Engineering
Department, and the Owners using direct labor hours as the cost driver.
6 Using your department rates for each department computed in question 5 and the costs
computed in Part 1, calculate the total cost of the project.
7 What cost drivers do you think best represent the most accurate overhead rates for this
job? Explain your answers for all 4 departments.
8 At this point, would you accept or reject the job after using this new information?
1.00 | Plantwide method:- | 1.in plantwide method , we use singal rate of Absorption. | |||||
2. in this Method, we cant identify Normal & abnormal loss Deptt Wise | |||||||
3. we just Aggregate all Costing of Deptt And then Divide it by Single Unit of Absorption | |||||||
4. Hence Can say that single Unit is used for Absorption. | |||||||
Departmental Method:- | 1.In this Method, we use Multiple Rate of Absorption. | ||||||
2. in this Method, we can identify Normal & abnormal loss Deptt Wise | |||||||
3. we just Aggregate all Costing of Deptt And then Divide it by Multiple Unit of Absorption | |||||||
4. Hence Can say that Multiple Unit is used for Absorption. | |||||||
5. this is most effective method of Cost Allocation | |||||||
2.00 | Plantwide Overhead Rate:- | ||||||
Concrete Casting | Design deptt | Engineering | Owner | Total Cost | |||
Total Overhead Cost (A) | 23,000.00 | 40,000.00 | 200,000.00 | 21,000.00 | 284,000.00 | ||
Total Labour Hrs (B) | 10,400.00 | 12,480.00 | 16,640.00 | 4,160.00 | 43,680.00 | ||
Departmental Rate Per Hrs | 6.50 | per Labour Hrs | |||||
(A/B) | |||||||
3.00 | Departmental Overhead Rate:- | ||||||
Concrete Casting | Design deptt | Engineering | Owner | ||||
Method/Unit Of Absorption | No of Frog | Project per year | Labour Hrs | Project per year | |||
Total Overhead Cost (A) | 23,000.00 | 40,000.00 | 200,000.00 | 21,000.00 | |||
Total no of Absorbing Unit (B) | 1000 frog | 200.00 | 16,640.00 | 200.00 | |||
hence Deptt Overhead rate | 23 | 200.00 | 12.02 | 105 | |||
(A/B) | per frog | per project per year | per Labour Hrs | Per Project per Year | |||
4.00 | Total cost of Project:- | ||||||
Departmental wide | Total Cost of Project | ||||||
Concrete Casting | Design deptt | Engineering | Owner | ||||
Direct Material | 62,000.00 | 10,000.00 | 900,000.00 | 1,000.00 | |||
Direct labour | 208,000.00 | 436,800.00 | 447,200.00 | 187,200.00 | |||
Overhead Cost | 23,000.00 | 40,000.00 | 200,000.00 | 21,000.00 | |||
(Using part 2 & 3) | 293,000.00 | 486,800.00 | 1,547,200.00 | 209,200.00 | 2,536,200.00 | ||
7.00 | Name of Department | Appropriate OH Rate Mathod | |||||
Concrete Casting | Frog Basis | ||||||
Design Depptt | project per Year | ||||||
Engineering | project per Year | ||||||
Owner | Hrs Basis |