In: Accounting
RozzisRozzis
Construction is analyzing its capital expenditure proposals for the purchase of equipment in the coming year. The capital budget is limited to
$ 5 comma 000 comma 000$5,000,000
for the year.
LindaLinda
BensonBenson?,
staff analyst at
RozzisRozzis?,
is preparing an analysis of the three projects under consideration by
ChesterChester
RozzisRozzis?,
the? company's owner.
Requirement 1. Because the? company's cash is? limited,
RozzisRozzis
thinks the payback method should be used to choose between the capital budgeting projects.
a. What are the benefits and limitations of using the payback method to choose between? projects?
Benefits of the payback? method:
A.
Easy to understand and captures uncertainty about expected cash flows in later years of a project
Your answer is correct.
B.
Indicates whether or not the project will earn the? company's minimum required rate of return
C.
Utilizes the time value of money and computes each? project's unique rate of return
D.
All of the above
Limitations of the payback? method:
A.
Cannot be used when? management's required rate of return varies from one period to the next.
B.
Cannot be used for projects with unequal periodic cash flows
C.
Fails to incorporate the time value of money and does not consider a? project's cash flows after the payback period
D.
All of the above
Data Table:
Project A
Project B
Project C
Projected cash outflow
Net initial investment
$3,000,000
$2,100,000
$3,000,000
Projected cash inflows
Year 1
$1,200,000
$1,200,000
$1,700,000
Year 2
1,200,000
600,000
1,700,000
Year 3
1,200,000
500,000
200,000
Year 4
1,200,000
100,000
Required rate of return
8%
8%
8%
Requirements:
1. |
Because the? company's cash is? limited,
RozzisRozzis thinks the payback method should be used to choose between the capital budgeting projects. |
|
a. |
What are the benefits and limitations of using the payback method to choose between? projects? |
|
b. |
Calculate the payback period for each of the three projects. Ignore
income taxes. Using the payback? method, which projects should
RozzisRozzis ?choose? |
|
2. |
BensonBenson thinks that projects should be selected based on their NPVs. Assume all cash flows occur at the end of the year except for initial investment amounts. Calculate the NPV for each project. Ignore income taxes. |
|
3. |
Which? projects, if? any, would you recommend? funding? Briefly explain why. |
1) | Annual incremental cash flows: | |||||||
Annual incremental revenues | 190000 | |||||||
Variable costs (15%) | 28500 | |||||||
Fixed costs | 80000 | |||||||
Incremental annual cash flow | 81500 | |||||||
Payback period = Initial investment/Annual cash flow = 178000/81500 = | 2.18 | Years | ||||||
Discounted payback: | ||||||||
Year | Cash flow | PVIF at 6% | PV at 6% | Cumulative PV | ||||
0 | -178000 | 1.00000 | -178000 | -178000 | ||||
1 | 81500 | 0.94340 | 76887 | -101113 | ||||
2 | 81500 | 0.89000 | 76888 | -24226 | ||||
3 | 81500 | 0.83962 | 68429 | 44203 | ||||
4 | 81500 | 0.79209 | 64556 | 108759 | ||||
5 | 81500 | 0.74726 | 60902 | 169661 | ||||
6 | 81500 | 0.70496 | 57454 | 227115 | ||||
7 | 81500 | 0.66506 | 54202 | 281317 | ||||
8 | 81500 | 0.62741 | 51134 | 332451 | ||||
9 | 81500 | 0.59190 | 48240 | 380691 | ||||
Discounted payback period = 2+24226/68429 = | 2.35 | Years | ||||||
2) | Payback period: | |||||||
Year | Cash flow | Cumulative Cash flow | ||||||
0 | -178000 | -178000 | ||||||
1 | 85000 | -93000 | ||||||
2 | 130000 | 37000 | ||||||
3 | 140000 | 177000 | ||||||
4 | 170000 | 347000 | ||||||
5 | 180000 | 527000 | ||||||
6 | 170000 | 697000 | ||||||
7 | 140000 | 837000 | ||||||
8 | 150000 | 987000 | ||||||
9 | 185000 | 1172000 | ||||||
Payback period = 1+93000/130000 = | 1.72 | Years | ||||||
Discounted payback: | ||||||||
Year | Cash flow | PVIF at 6% | PV at 6% | Cumulative PV | ||||
0 | -178000 | 1.00000 | -178000 | -178000 | ||||
1 | 85000 | 0.94340 | 80189 | -97811 | ||||
2 | 130000 | 0.89000 | 80190 | -17622 | ||||
3 | 140000 | 0.83962 | 117547 | 99925 | ||||
4 | 170000 | 0.79209 | 134656 | 234581 | ||||
5 | 180000 | 0.74726 | 134506 | 369087 | ||||
6 | 170000 | 0.70496 | 119843 | 488931 | ||||
7 | 140000 | 0.66506 | 93108 | 582039 | ||||
8 | 150000 | 0.62741 | 94112 | 676150 | ||||
9 | 185000 | 0.59190 | 109501 | 785652 | ||||
Discounted payback period = 2+17622/117547 = | 2.15 | Years | ||||||
1) | a. What are the benefits and limitations of using the payback method to choose between Projects? | |||||||
Benefits of the payback method: | ||||||||
A. | ||||||||
Easy to understand and captures uncertainty about expected cash flows in later years of a project | ||||||||
Limitations of the payback method: | ||||||||
C. | ||||||||
Fails to incorporate the time value of money and does not consider a? project's cash flows after the payback period | ||||||||
2) | PROJECT A: | |||||||
Year | Cash flow | |||||||
0 | -3000000 | |||||||
1 | 1200000 | |||||||
2 | 1200000 | |||||||
3 | 1200000 | |||||||
4 | 1200000 | |||||||
Payback period = 3000000/1200000 = | 2.50 | Years | ||||||
PROJECT B: | ||||||||
Year | Cash flow | Cumulative cash flow | ||||||
0 | -2100000 | -2100000 | ||||||
1 | 1200000 | -900000 | ||||||
2 | 600000 | -300000 | ||||||
3 | 500000 | 200000 | ||||||
4 | 100000 | 300000 | ||||||
Payback period = 2+300000/500000= | 2.60 | Years | ||||||
PROJECT C: | ||||||||
Year | Cash flow | Cumulative cash flow | ||||||
0 | -3000000 | -3000000 | ||||||
1 | 1700000 | -1300000 | ||||||
2 | 1700000 | 400000 | ||||||
3 | 200000 | 600000 | ||||||
4 | 0 | 600000 | ||||||
Payback period = 1+1300000/1700000= | 1.76 | Years | ||||||
Projects should be ranked in the ascending order of payback period. | ||||||||
Hence, the order of ranking is Project C, Project A and Project B. | ||||||||
But as available capital is limited to $5000000, only Project C can be | ||||||||
chosen. | ||||||||
2) | PROJECT A: | |||||||
Year | Cash flow | PVIF at 8% | PV at 8% | |||||
0 | -3000000 | 1.00000 | -3000000 | |||||
1 | 1200000 | 0.92593 | 1111111 | |||||
2 | 1200000 | 0.85734 | 1028807 | |||||
3 | 1200000 | 0.79383 | 952599 | |||||
4 | 1200000 | 0.73503 | 882036 | |||||
NPV = | 974552 | |||||||
PROJECT B: | ||||||||
Year | Cash flow | PVIF at 8% | PV at 8% | |||||
0 | -2100000 | 1.00000 | -2100000 | ` | ||||
1 | 1200000 | 0.92593 | 1111111 | ` | ||||
2 | 600000 | 0.85734 | 514403 | |||||
3 | 500000 | 0.79383 | 396916 | |||||
4 | 100000 | 0.73503 | 73503 | |||||
NPV = | -4066 | |||||||
PROJECT C: | ||||||||
Year | Cash flow | PVIF at 8% | PV at 8% | |||||
0 | -3000000 | 1.00000 | -3000000 | |||||
1 | 1700000 | 0.92593 | 1574074 | |||||
2 | 1700000 | 0.85734 | 1457476 | |||||
3 | 200000 | 0.79383 | 158766 | |||||
4 | 0 | 0.73503 | 0 | |||||
NPV = | 190317 | |||||||
3) | Projects A and C are acceptable as they have positive NPV's | |||||||
with Project A having Rank 1 and Project C having rank 2. | ||||||||
But, as available capital is limited, only Project A can be | ||||||||
implemented. |