In: Economics
Discuss the following case within the framework of burden of proof.
Mr. A asserts that Mr. B owes him 100 TL, which was due on 1 October. Mr. B argues that while he did owe Mr. A that amount, he paid it on 1 September. Mr. A argues that although he received that amount from Mr. B, it was the payment of an earlier dept.
Burden of proof theory suggest that a party have to demonstrate that a claim is valid or invalid based on facts and evidence. the party which filling a claim must demonstrate the evidence for validity of the claim..
Here in the scenario Mr. A claim that Mr.B owes him 100 TL and also Mr.B admits that and confessed he already paid the money on 1 September. Further Mr. A again argued and claim that the money Mr.B paid was for earlier dept and the due 100TL money is pending on 1st October.
Now for this claim of Mr. A, he have to show proper evidence and proved it . It's the "Burden of proof" in this process..
(Please give an up vote if you find it helpful)..