In: Economics
Competitor |
|||
Without Premium |
With Premium |
||
Time Warner |
Without Premium |
65, 35 |
70, 30 |
With Premium |
60, 40 |
65, 35 |
What is the dominant strategy for each player and why?
What is the nash equilibrium?
If competitor chooses strategy ' without premium' then for Time Warner the strategy 'without premium' yields greater payoff than the strategy 'with premium' and hence Time Warner will choose the strategy ' without premium' . Similarly if the competitor chooses strategy 'with premium' then for Time warner the strategy 'without premium' yields greater payoff than the strategy 'with premium' and hence Time warner will choose the strategy 'without premium'. Clearly Time warner always chooses the strategy 'without premium' irrespective of competitor's strategy i.e Time Warner's strategy is not dependent on competitor's strategy and hence 'without premium' is dominant strategy for Time warner.
Similarly If Time warner chooses strategy ' without premium' then for competitor the strategy 'without premium' yields greater payoff than the strategy 'with premium' and hence competitor will choose the strategy ' without premium' . Similarly if the Time warner chooses strategy 'with premium' then for competitor the strategy 'without premium' yields greater payoff than the strategy 'with premium' and hence competitor will choose the strategy 'without premium'. Clearly Competitor always chooses the strategy 'without premium' irrespective of Time Warner's strategy i.e Competitor's strategy is not dependent on Time warner's strategy and hence 'without premium' is dominant strategy for Competitor.
So for both players ' without premium ' is dominant strategy. Since both players have dominant strategy , it means that they will always play/choose their dominant strategy. So in this case both players will always choose 'without premium'. Hence (without premium, without premium) = (65,35) is the nash equilibrium of the game.