In: Finance
True Industry has come up with a new mountain bike prototype and
is ready to go ahead with pilot production and test marketing. The
pilot production and test marketing phase will cost $100,000 and
last for one year. The management team believes that there is a 30%
chance that the test marketing will be successful and that there
will be sufficient demand for the new mountain bike. If the
test-marketing phase is successful, then True Industry will invest
$2 million to build a plant immediately that will generate expected
annual after-tax cash flows of $300,000 in perpetuity starting in
year two. If the test marketing is not successful, True Industry
can still go ahead and build the new plant, but the expected annual
after-tax cash flows would be only $150,000 in perpetuity starting
in year two. True Industry's cost of capital is 10%.
Suppose that True Industry has the option to sell the prototype
mountain bike at the end of the first year for $50,000. The NPV of
the VFIC Mountain Bike Project is around:
Summary of the problem:
True Industry pilot production and test marketing phase cost = $100,000
Duration = one year.
Chance that the test marketing will be successful (P1) = 30%
If successful, then investment = $2 million (2,000,000)
Expected annual after-tax cash flows starting in year two = $300,000
If Unsuccessful, expected annual after-tax cash flows starting in year two = $150,000
cost of capital = 10%
OPTION: Sell the prototype at the end of the first year for = $50,000
Solution:
CASE 1: Value, if test is successfull:
Build Plant: NPV1 = -2000000 + (300000/ 10%) = $ 1,000,000 (Initial CF + CF / R)
CASE 2: Value, if test is UNsuccessfull:
Buld Plant: NPV2= -2000000 + (150000/ 10%) = - $ 500,000
CASE 3: Dont Build, Sell Prorotype: NPV3 = $50,000
Since $50,000 > -$500,000 , its better off to sell prototype, if its unsucessful.
NPV = (30% * 1000000 + 70% * 50000 ) / 1.10 = 304545.45 ((P1* NPV1 + (1-P1)*NPV3)) / ((1+R)^1)
So the NPV is closest to $ 304545.45.
# Please upvote if the solution helps.
# You may use the comments section to revert, if I have missed out on any aspect of your question