Question

In: Accounting

A significant part of the audit entailed verifying the physical count, cost, and summarization of inventory....

A significant part of the audit entailed verifying the physical count, cost, and summarization of inventory. Inventory was highly significant to the financial statements, and Yost knew the inventory was pledged as collateral for a large loan to First City National Bank. In reviewing Stuart's inventory count procedures, Yost told the president she believed the method of counting inventory at various locations on different days was highly undesirable. The president stated that it was impractical to count all inventory on the same day because of personnel shortages and customer preference. After considerable discussion, Yost agreed to permit the practice if the president signed a statement that no other method was practical. The CPA firm had at least one person at each site to audit the inventory count procedures and actual count. There were more than 40 locations.
Eighteen months later, Yost found out that the worst had happened. Management below the president's level had conspired to materially overstate inventory as a means of covering up obsolete inventory and inventory losses resulting from mismanagement. The misstatement occurred by physically transporting inventory at night to other locations after it had been counted in a given location. The accounting records were inadequate to uncover these illegal transfers.
Both Stuart Supply Company and First City National Bank sued Lauren Yost & Co.
2: Requirements
Answer the following questions, setting forth reasons for any conclusions stated:
a. What defense should Lauren Yost & Co. use in the suit by Stuart?
b. What defense should Lauren Yost & Co. use in the suit by First City National Bank?
c. Is Yost likely to be successful in her defenses?
d. Would the issues or outcome be significantly different if the suit was brought under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Based on the details of events and records,

a) in defense against suit by stuart, Lauren Yost & Co. should say that they have verified the stocks at all 40 locations and can show the Inventory statements signed as well as can also put forward the signed statement from President when she had pointed out about the Inventory management procedure and the way of accouting records were maintained.

b) in defence against suit by First City National Bank, Lauren & Co. should /can argue the same as did against Stuart. they can produce the signed documents by Stock management Team and the president.

c) Yost may be succesfull in her defenses as the maintainance of accounting records and management of Inventories are the liability of the company's management. Onus of transparency and accountability lies on the organisation and Auditors responsibility is to exploring the faults in systems and mentioning them in their reports that they did.

d) issues or outconme would be same if the suit was brought under the securities Exchange act of 1934.


Related Solutions

Royal Corporation’s inventory at December 31, 2021, was $126,000 (at cost) based on a physical count...
Royal Corporation’s inventory at December 31, 2021, was $126,000 (at cost) based on a physical count of inventory on hand, before any necessary adjustment for the following: Merchandise costing $16,000, shipped f.o.b. shipping point from a vendor on December 27, 2021, was received by Royal on January 5, 2022. Merchandise costing $46,000 was shipped to a customer f.o.b. shipping point on December 28, 2021, arrived at the customer’s location on January 6, 2022. Merchandise costing $22,000 was being held on...
Is it necessary to do a physical count of inventory if the company is using a...
Is it necessary to do a physical count of inventory if the company is using a perpetual system? Why or why not? What sort of company would likely use a perpetual system? What sort of company would likely use a periodic system? (Provide specific examples). Please provide one main post and two additional peer interactions. Your main post must be a minimum of 200 words
Is it necessary to do a physical count of inventory if the company is using a...
Is it necessary to do a physical count of inventory if the company is using a perpetual system? Why or why not? What sort of company would likely use a perpetual system? What sort of company would likely use a periodic system? (Provide specific examples).
The company takes a physical inventory count at the end of the year and adjusts their...
The company takes a physical inventory count at the end of the year and adjusts their inventory and cost of goods sold if there is a difference between the inventory value determined from the actual count compared to the value in the general ledger. The information below includes the number of units counted in inventory at the end of the year and the purchases of inventory during the month. Number of units held in the company's inventory at 12/31/2016 based...
At the end of the period, a physical inventory count of goods actually in the warehouse...
At the end of the period, a physical inventory count of goods actually in the warehouse showed that West, Inc. had $65,000 of goods on hand.West had $24,000 of goods out on consignment with a customer (West is the consignor) and $17,000 of goods on consignment from a vendor (West is the consignee). West had a purchase order (West is the buyer) for$8,000 of inventory (FOB destination) that was still in transit.Finally, West had sold $6,500 of inventory (FOB destination)...
You are part of the team assigned to a physical count of products held at your...
You are part of the team assigned to a physical count of products held at your client’s site. They have two warehouse buildings with inventory and thousands of line items, and a large area where trucks are loaded and unloaded. When you arrive with the team in the morning of your test counting, you notice maybe 25 or so unattended truck trailers parked at the back of the lot. Walking the property you see that the trucks are closed and...
Q3. Explain the importance of observing physical inventory during an audit.
Q3. Explain the importance of observing physical inventory during an audit.
You are an auditor assigned to observe and test your client’s physical count of inventory at...
You are an auditor assigned to observe and test your client’s physical count of inventory at year-end. For one of your procedures, you have made your own test counts of randomly selected items of the client’s inventory. Clearly answer each of the following with respect to the year-end inventory account balance on the general ledger: A.) How could the evidence you selected be used to test the management assertion of completeness? B.) How could you test the management assertion of...
The December 31, 2018, inventory of Tog Company, based on a physical count, was determined to...
The December 31, 2018, inventory of Tog Company, based on a physical count, was determined to be $460,000. Included in that count was a shipment of goods received from a supplier at the end of the month that cost $60,000. The purchase was recorded and paid for in 2019. Another supplier shipment costing $25,000 was correctly recorded as a purchase in 2018. However, the merchandise, shipped FOB shipping point, was not received until 2019 and was incorrectly omitted from the...
The December 31, 2021, inventory of Tog Company, based on a physical count, was determined to...
The December 31, 2021, inventory of Tog Company, based on a physical count, was determined to be $465,000. Included in that count was a shipment of goods received from a supplier at the end of the month that cost $65,000. The purchase was recorded and paid for in 2022. Another supplier shipment costing $27,500 was correctly recorded as a purchase in 2021. However, the merchandise, shipped FOB shipping point, was not received until 2022 and was incorrectly omitted from the...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT