In: Accounting
Answer both questions using chart
Lock-Tite Company
Jobs Report – Traditional OH allocation (Direct Labor Dollars)
Year Ending December 31
JV28 |
BY92 |
ZF14 |
||||
Sales Revenue |
132,800 |
99,600 |
92,960 |
Calculated in 7e) |
||
Job Costs: |
||||||
Direct Material |
26,560 |
19,920 |
13,280 |
From 7a) |
||
Direct Labor |
7,842 |
5,882 |
5,882 |
From 7b) |
||
Overhead |
4,313 |
3,235 |
3,235 |
From 7c) |
||
Total Job Costs |
38,715 |
29,037 |
22,397 |
|||
Gross Margin |
70.85 |
70.85 |
75.91 |
|||
Gross Margin % |
53% |
71% |
82% |
a) Yes Lock Tite should be worried about the accuracy of overhead allocation to jobs. The traditional cost driver allocates overheads based on one cost driver only. All the overheads may not have a single cost driver and hence the overheads allocated as per traditional method is unreliable. The higher gross margin is due to under-applied manufacturing overheads to each job. The products are under costed as per existing system of allocation of overheads
b) The gross margin percentage is unrealistic and under applied overheads is giving lot of profits on the job. The firm might be charging too much to the customers if the pricing is cost based pricing. The overheads are allocated as per single cost driver without actual cost driver being used in allocation. Thus the products are under costed since manufacturing overhead is under applied. When a rational cost driver is used the product costs are accurately reflected and gross margin reflection will be realistic.