The profit loss sharing is based on two major modes of financing
namely mudaraba & musharaka. The profit loss sharing concept
marginally features in the practice of Islamic banking &
finance. According to the international association of Islamic
banks, PLS covered less than 20% of investments made by Islamic
banks located worldwide.
There is lack of PLS concept in the Islamic financing for the
following reasons:
- The PLS contracts are inherently vulnerable to agency problems
as entrepreneurs have disincentives to put in effort & have
incentives for reporting less profit as compared to the self
financing owner manager.
- The profit loss sharing contracts also require well defined
profit rights to function efficiently which are not properly
defined or protected in most Muslim countries.
- They also have to offer relatively less risky modes of
financing because they face heavy competition from the conventional
banks that are more competitive.
- The shareholders have a restrictive role in management &
hence the financial structure of PLS is dichotomous that make them
non participatory & also allows a sleeping partnership.
- Fifth, equity financing is not feasible for funding short-term
projects due to the ensuing high degree of risk (i.e., the time
diversification effect of equity). This makes Islamic banks and
other financial institutions rely on some other debt-like modes,
especially mark-up to ensure a certain degree of liquidity.
- There is also unfair treatment of taxation which is a major
obstacle in the profit sharing. The interest is exempted when the
profit is taxed. This legal discrimination & tax evasion makes
profit sharing a less reliable tool.
- Seventh, secondary markets for trading in Islamic financial
instruments, particularly Mudaraba and Musharaka, are non-existent.
Consequently, they have so far failed to effectively mobilize
financial resources.
Hence all the above mentioned imbalances needs to be removed in
order to increase the appeal for the profit sharing concept.