In: Operations Management
You are being consulted as a young forensic investigator. Here are the facts:
Your client, Mr. Clean, comes to you with the following true story.
Try to propose answers to the following questions:
The biggest argument here is that Mr. Dirty had $1.0 Million in coins in his two bedroom apartment. This is huge money to have in coins, and a person can only have such amount of money in coins if he is working at a place where coins is the only mode of payment.
This is justifiable as Mr. Dirty and Mr. Clean were running a coin-operated laundry. So if the Ledger books and financial statements for the laundry show $1.0 Million money unaccountable or unequal split, there is a possibility that Mr.Dirty took the laundry's money in an illegitimate manner.
Also if the account books don't show a discrepancy, then Mr. Clean would have to track the money generated by laundry through the machines, as every individual machine has its own status of how many times each machine has been run. If the machine records and the money on papers do not match than also it could turn in favour of Mr. Clean.
Thus, this circumstantial evidence would be enough to keep things in favour of Mr.Clean.