Question

In: Economics

The United States Court of Appeals cited precedent in deciding to hear a case where United...

The United States Court of Appeals cited precedent in deciding to hear a case where United States Congress repeal (overturn of a previous statute) of the Voting Rights Acts conflicts with the 15th Amendment of the United States Constitution. Which case serves as precedent for the Supreme Court?

Solutions

Expert Solution

The american case system is based on the principle of stare decisis and the idea that the LIKE cases should be decided ALIKE. Each judge , when deciding a matter before him or her, selects the prior cases on which to rely ( No external authority designates precedents)

Now for a Prior case to be considered as a binding precedent, it must meet two requirements which are as follows:-

# As compared with the present matter before the judge, the prior case must address the same legal questions as applied to similar facts. The judge gives more emphasis to the prior case if it has a higher degree of factual similarity. Hence the degree of similarity is often a of a point of contention between parties to a litigation

# The second requirement is that the case must have been decided by the same court or a superior court within the hierarchy to which the court considers the case belongs. Each state court thus follows the precedent handed down by the supreme court and by the court of appeals in the circuit encompassing the district court. A court may consider decisions byu other , non superior courts to be persuasive precedent and follow them if they are all reasoned and if there is no binding precedent that conflicts.

Thankyou, Hope it helped. Do leave a thumbsup

Cheers


Related Solutions

brief case of united states v. liebo, united states court of appeals, eight circuit, 1991,923 F.2d...
brief case of united states v. liebo, united states court of appeals, eight circuit, 1991,923 F.2d 1308
In 2014, the 11th United States Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Chiquita Brands, a...
In 2014, the 11th United States Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Chiquita Brands, a Cincinnati–based multinational marketer and distributor of food products—widely known for its Chiquita banana brand—which had been accused by 4000 Colombians of supporting paramilitary soldiers who had killed or tortured their relatives. The court ruled on technical grounds that the Colombians could not sue the company under the laws they had cited. “The Alien Tort Statute does not apply extraterritorially,” wrote Judge David Sentelle, and...
BUSINESS LAW CASE ANALYSIS. Morales-Cruz v. University of Puerto Rico United States Court of Appeals, First...
BUSINESS LAW CASE ANALYSIS. Morales-Cruz v. University of Puerto Rico United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 676 F.3d 220 (2012). Background and Facts In 2003, Myrta Morales-Cruz began a tenure-track teaching position at the University of Puerto Rico School of Law. During Morales-Cruz’s probationary period, one of her co-teachers in a law school clinic had an affair with one of their students, and it resulted in a pregnancy. In 2008, Morales-Cruz wanted the university’s administrative committee to approve a...
CASE: HAROLD DAVIS and ENID DAVIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee UNITED STATES COURT...
CASE: HAROLD DAVIS and ENID DAVIS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 861 F.2d 558 November 14, 1988 Plaintiff-appellants Harold and Enid Davis claimed charitable deductions under IRC section 170 for funds they sent to their two sons for their support while they served as full-time unpaid missionaries for the Church of Jesus Christ of LatterDay-Saints at the New York City Mission and at the New Zealand/Cook Islands Mission. These...
Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) United States v. Bestfoods 113...
Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) United States v. Bestfoods 113 F.3d 572 (1998) SOUTER, JUSTICE The United States brought this action under §107(a)(2) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) against, among others, respondent CPC International, Inc., the parent corporation of the defunct Ott Chemical Co. (Ott II), for the costs of cleaning up industrial waste generated by Ott II’s chemical plant. Section 107(a)(2) authorizes suits against, among others,...
Please review (in depth) the court case of United States vs. Microsoft. Please list the facts...
Please review (in depth) the court case of United States vs. Microsoft. Please list the facts of the case, results and reasoning. Thank you.
United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)
United States v. Bailey United States Supreme Court 444 U.S. 394 (1980)
Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) Is direct liability for a...
Based on Court Case United States v. Bestfoods 113F.3d 572 (1998) Is direct liability for a parent company's operation of the facility distinct from derivative liability for the subsidiary's operation of the facility?
Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to hear a case in which a man...
Five years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court chose to hear a case in which a man was arrested by the Secret Service in 2006 for going up to then-Vice President Cheney and telling him that he was wrong about his decision to go into Iraq. The man sued the Secret Service for arresting him, saying that the First Amendment protects his right to criticize the government. The Court decided whether he had a First Amendment right to sue. In another...
what are the similarities between the United States and Netherlands court system?
what are the similarities between the United States and Netherlands court system?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT