In: Accounting
Firm X has a new promotional program that offers a free gift-wrapping service for its customers. Its customer-service department has practical capacity to wrap 5,000 gifts at a budgeted fixed cost of $4,950 each month. The budgeted variable cost to gift-wrap an item is $0.35. During September 2020, the department budgeted to wrap 4,500 gifts. Although the service is free to customers, a gift-wrapping service cost allocation is made to the department where the item was purchased. The customer-service department reported the following for the month:
|
Department |
Budgeted Items Wrapped |
Actual Items Wrapped |
|
A |
1,000 |
1,200 |
|
B |
850 |
650 |
|
C |
1,000 |
900 |
|
D |
750 |
450 |
|
E |
900 |
800 |
|
Total |
4,500 |
4,000 |
(27-1) Using the single-rate method, allocate gift-wrapping costs to different departments in these three ways (7 points):
(27-1-a). Calculate the budgeted rate based on the budgeted number of gifts to be wrapped and allocate costs based on the budgeted use (of gift-wrapping services).
(27-1-b). Calculate the budgeted rate based on the budgeted number of gifts to be wrapped and allocate costs based on actual usage.
(27-1-c). Calculate the budgeted rate based on the practical gift-wrapping capacity available and allocate costs based on actual usage
(27-2) Using the dual-rate method, compute the amount allocated to each department and the budgeted rate is based on capacity. (3 points)
(27-3) Comment on your results in (26.1) and (26.2). Discuss the differences, advantages, and disadvantages of the single-rate method and dual-rate method. (6 points)
| 27-1-a. |
| Budgeted rate based on the budgeted number of gifts to be wrapped = |
| Single rate for both Fixed costs & Variable cost combined |
| ie.(4950+(4500*0.35))/4500 |
| 1.45 |
| per item |
| 27-1-a.Allocation costs based on the budgeted use (of gift-wrapping services) | ||
| Department | Budgeted Items Wrapped | No.of items*$1.45/item |
| A | 1,000 | 1450 |
| B | 850 | 1232.5 |
| C | 1,000 | 1450 |
| D | 750 | 1087.5 |
| E | 900 | 1305 |
| Total | 4,500 | 6525 |
| (27-1-b) Allocation of above budgeted rate costs based on actual usage. | ||
| Department | Actual Items Wrapped | No.of items*$1.45/item |
| A | 1,200 | 1740 |
| B | 650 | 942.5 |
| C | 900 | 1305 |
| D | 450 | 652.5 |
| E | 800 | 1160 |
| Total | 4,000 | 5800 |
| (27-1-c)Budgeted rate based on the practical gift-wrapping capacity available |
| ie.(4950/5000)+0.35= |
| 0.99+0.35= $ 1.34 |
| per item |
| & allocation of costs based on actual usage | ||
| Department | Actual Items Wrapped | No.of items*$1.34/item |
| A | 1,200 | 1608 |
| B | 650 | 871 |
| C | 900 | 1206 |
| D | 450 | 603 |
| E | 800 | 1072 |
| Total | 4,000 | 5360 |
| (27-2) Using the dual-rate method,amount allocated to each department and the budgeted rate is based on capacity |
| Dept. | Budgeted Items Wrapped | FOH at 4950/5000=0.99/item*Budgeted items | Actual Items Wrapped | VOH at 0.35/item*actual item | Total OH allocated--Cols.(3+5) |
| A | 1,000 | 990 | 1,200 | 420 | 1410 |
| B | 850 | 841.5 | 650 | 227.5 | 1069 |
| C | 1,000 | 990 | 900 | 315 | 1305 |
| D | 750 | 742.5 | 450 | 157.5 | 900 |
| E | 900 | 891 | 800 | 280 | 1171 |
| Total | 4,500 | 4455 | 4,000 | 1400 | 5855 |
| Summary | |
| Single-rate based on | Total OH |
| Budgeted usage | 6525 |
| Actual usage | 5800 |
| Practical capacity | 5360 |
| Dual rate(based on budgeted usage*FOH rate based on practical capacity) & (actual usage budgeted*VOH rate) | 5855 |
| Fixed costs towards unused capacity of 5000-4000=1000 items , ie. 1000* $ 0.99=$ 990 is borne by the actual items wrapped. |
| 27-3 Single-rate method |
| Advantage |
| Easy to implement--as there is no need to segregate costs into fixed & variable |
| So,costs to implement are also less. |
| Disadvantage |
| Decisions based on this , may be favorable to one dept. & adverse to another. |
| Dual rate method |
| Advantage |
| Segregates costs into fixed & variable components. |
| so, it is easy to identify idle /unused capacities & utilise them fully to lower the incidence of costs on units. |
| Disadvantage |
| Is the difficulty in segregating costs & implementing systems. |