In: Accounting
Firm X has a new promotional program that offers a free gift-wrapping service for its customers. Its customer-service department has practical capacity to wrap 5,000 gifts at a budgeted fixed cost of $4,950 each month. The budgeted variable cost to gift-wrap an item is $0.35. During September 2020, the department budgeted to wrap 4,500 gifts. Although the service is free to customers, a gift-wrapping service cost allocation is made to the department where the item was purchased. The customer-service department reported the following for the month:
Department |
Budgeted Items Wrapped |
Actual Items Wrapped |
A |
1,000 |
1,200 |
B |
850 |
650 |
C |
1,000 |
900 |
D |
750 |
450 |
E |
900 |
800 |
Total |
4,500 |
4,000 |
(27-1) Using the single-rate method, allocate gift-wrapping costs to different departments in these three ways (7 points):
(27-1-a). Calculate the budgeted rate based on the budgeted number of gifts to be wrapped and allocate costs based on the budgeted use (of gift-wrapping services).
(27-1-b). Calculate the budgeted rate based on the budgeted number of gifts to be wrapped and allocate costs based on actual usage.
(27-1-c). Calculate the budgeted rate based on the practical gift-wrapping capacity available and allocate costs based on actual usage
(27-2) Using the dual-rate method, compute the amount allocated to each department and the budgeted rate is based on capacity. (3 points)
(27-3) Comment on your results in (26.1) and (26.2). Discuss the differences, advantages, and disadvantages of the single-rate method and dual-rate method. (6 points)
27-1-a. |
Budgeted rate based on the budgeted number of gifts to be wrapped = |
Single rate for both Fixed costs & Variable cost combined |
ie.(4950+(4500*0.35))/4500 |
1.45 |
per item |
27-1-a.Allocation costs based on the budgeted use (of gift-wrapping services) | ||
Department | Budgeted Items Wrapped | No.of items*$1.45/item |
A | 1,000 | 1450 |
B | 850 | 1232.5 |
C | 1,000 | 1450 |
D | 750 | 1087.5 |
E | 900 | 1305 |
Total | 4,500 | 6525 |
(27-1-b) Allocation of above budgeted rate costs based on actual usage. | ||
Department | Actual Items Wrapped | No.of items*$1.45/item |
A | 1,200 | 1740 |
B | 650 | 942.5 |
C | 900 | 1305 |
D | 450 | 652.5 |
E | 800 | 1160 |
Total | 4,000 | 5800 |
(27-1-c)Budgeted rate based on the practical gift-wrapping capacity available |
ie.(4950/5000)+0.35= |
0.99+0.35= $ 1.34 |
per item |
& allocation of costs based on actual usage | ||
Department | Actual Items Wrapped | No.of items*$1.34/item |
A | 1,200 | 1608 |
B | 650 | 871 |
C | 900 | 1206 |
D | 450 | 603 |
E | 800 | 1072 |
Total | 4,000 | 5360 |
(27-2) Using the dual-rate method,amount allocated to each department and the budgeted rate is based on capacity |
Dept. | Budgeted Items Wrapped | FOH at 4950/5000=0.99/item*Budgeted items | Actual Items Wrapped | VOH at 0.35/item*actual item | Total OH allocated--Cols.(3+5) |
A | 1,000 | 990 | 1,200 | 420 | 1410 |
B | 850 | 841.5 | 650 | 227.5 | 1069 |
C | 1,000 | 990 | 900 | 315 | 1305 |
D | 750 | 742.5 | 450 | 157.5 | 900 |
E | 900 | 891 | 800 | 280 | 1171 |
Total | 4,500 | 4455 | 4,000 | 1400 | 5855 |
Summary | |
Single-rate based on | Total OH |
Budgeted usage | 6525 |
Actual usage | 5800 |
Practical capacity | 5360 |
Dual rate(based on budgeted usage*FOH rate based on practical capacity) & (actual usage budgeted*VOH rate) | 5855 |
Fixed costs towards unused capacity of 5000-4000=1000 items , ie. 1000* $ 0.99=$ 990 is borne by the actual items wrapped. |
27-3 Single-rate method |
Advantage |
Easy to implement--as there is no need to segregate costs into fixed & variable |
So,costs to implement are also less. |
Disadvantage |
Decisions based on this , may be favorable to one dept. & adverse to another. |
Dual rate method |
Advantage |
Segregates costs into fixed & variable components. |
so, it is easy to identify idle /unused capacities & utilise them fully to lower the incidence of costs on units. |
Disadvantage |
Is the difficulty in segregating costs & implementing systems. |