Question

Should exchange transactions be accounted for differently than contributions? In December 2020, the Consumer Association of America (CAA), a not-for-profit research organization, received a $6 million grant from the Sporting Goods Manufacturers Association (SGMA) to develop a football helmet that will provide better protection against head injuries. The grant was intended to cover $4 million of direct costs and $2 million of overhead costs. The grant contract stipulated that the SGMA would make its payment to the CAA upon receiving invoices from CAA for the actual direct costs incurred. It further required that the research results be reported only to the SGMA and not be made publicly available. Each reimbursement payment for direct costs incurred would also include an appropriate proportion of indirect costs (i.e., an additional $0.50 for each $1 of direct costs). In 2021 the CAA carried out and completed the research for which it contracted. Direct costs were, as estimated, $4 million. It submitted the necessary invoices and received payment in full. Prepare required journal entries for 2020 and 2021. Be sure to indicate whether each entry should be made to an restricted by the donor fund or not restricted by the donor fund. You need not, however, record the indirect costs themselves (inasmuch as, by their very nature, they are not tied directly to the grant). Assume instead that in December 2020 the CAA received from the National Sports Association (NSA) a pledge of $6 million. The donation is for research relating to football helmets. The NSA is a not-for-profit agency, and the results of any research will be in the public domain. In January 2021, the CAA received the contribution. Throughout the remainder of 2021 it carried out its football-related research (incurring $4 million of direct costs). Prepare the required journal entries for 2020 and 2021 and indicate whether each entry should be made to a fund that is restricted by a donor or not. Comment on any differences between the two awards that might justify differences in revenue recognition. Suppose instead that the NSA promised to make its contribution only on receiving a report that the research had actually been completed. Would your approach have been different? Explain.

Answer 1

• Research grant(contractual agreement):

This grant has the features of an exchange transactions rather than a contribution. It is not donor restricted and therefore would be reported in a unrestricted fund.

2020

No entry would be required when the grant is recieved (contract signed), in essence the grant is a contract, at the time the grant is recieved, research services. The manufacture association has not yet made any payments.

2020 unrestricted fund

Particulars    Debit    Credit

Research expense a/c dr. $4

To cash(or accounts payable)    $4

Grants&contracts accounts recieveable $6

To revenue from sponsored research   $6

Cash A/C dr. $6

To grants and contracts recievable $6

• Restricted Contribution

This contribution restricted by the donor for a specific purposes.

2020: Temporarily restricted fund

Pledges recievable( from NASA) a/c dr. $6

To revenues from contribution $6

2021: unrestricted fund

Researches expenses A/c Dr. $4

To cash $4

Due from restricted fund a/c dr $6

To net asset released from restriction $6

Cash A/C dr. $6

To due from restricted fund $6

Tenperorily restricted fund

Cash A/C dr. $6

To pledge recievable $6

Net asset released from restrictions a/c $6

To cash $6

Notepoint:- other contribution of entries would also lead to the same end results.

The grant revenue from the SGMA was recognized only as the resaerch was carried out. It is an ordinery commercial cost plus contract the restricted contribution from the NSA was recognized when the pledge was made.it is not conditioned onany specefic activities on the part of the CAA.

FASB statement no.116 stipulates that revenue from conditinal contribution should not be recognized until the condition are satisfied. Therefore CAA would not recgonize revenue from NSA contribution until it hadcomoleted the research