Question

In: Accounting

A new renewable energy generation system has a life-time of 10 years. It is assumed that...

A new renewable energy generation system has a life-time of 10 years. It is assumed that the salvage value of the system at the end of the 10 years' life-time is negligible. The initial (Present time) investment of the system costs 50,000 HK$. The manufacturer agrees to maintain the system every year over the 10 years' life-time with a uniform annual maintenance fee of 1000 HK$/year. At the end of the 5th year, a key component should be replaced, which will cost 10,000 HK$. Each year, this renewable energy system will generate 5,000 kWh electricity. It is assumed that the electricity price in the first year is 1 HK$/kWh, with an annual escalation rate of 3%. The interest rate is 5%.

Please calculate:

(1) The present value of the total maintenance fee over 10 years' life-time.

(2) The present value of the total saved electricity cost over 10 years' life-time.

(3) The net present value of this system, by considering all the cash flows mentioned in the question statement.

(4) If the replacement cost 10,000 HK$ of the key component at the end of the 5th year is accumulated by depositing a fixed amount of money per year in the first 5 years, how much should be this deposited money per year?

(5) Based on the above questions , please investigate that how the "interest rate" and its variation will affect the results of the above questions, and discuss and comment on their sensitivity. For example, the "interest rate" varies +/- 0~0.03 based on the original 0.05 (i.e. the interest rate varies in the range between 2%~8%).(*two page report is required)

Solutions

Expert Solution

Solution (1) The present value of the total maintenance fee over 10 years' life-time.
HK$
maintenance fee 1000
PV annuity factory for 10 year 7.7217
Total present value of tatal maintenance fee 7722
Solution (2) The present value of the total saved electricity cost over 10 years' life-time.
      = HK$ 45050 (working)
Working
Year Annual electricity saved Escalation Rate Electricity rate Annual Electricity saved PV factor @ 5% Present value of saved electricity cost
0 0 1 1.0000
1 5000 0.03 1.03 5150 0.9524 4905
2 5000 0.03 1.06 5305 0.9070 4811
3 5000 0.03 1.09 5464 0.8638 4720
4 5000 0.03 1.13 5628 0.8227 4630
5 5000 0.03 1.16 5796 0.7835 4542
6 5000 0.03 1.19 5970 0.7462 4455
7 5000 0.03 1.23 6149 0.7107 4370
8 5000 0.03 1.27 6334 0.6768 4287
9 5000 0.03 1.30 6524 0.6446 4205
10 5000 0.03 1.34 6720 0.6139 4125
Total 45050
Solution (3) The net present value of the system, by considering all the cash flows mentioned.
HK$
Initial investment 50000
Present value of management fee 7722
Present vlaue of key component replaced 7835
(10000*.7835)
Less: Present value of saved electricity cost -45050
Present value of the system (Cost) 20507
Solution (4) Deposit amount
where interest rate = 5%
Annual amount of deposit
    =Replacement amount / Annuity factor of 5 year
    =10000/4.3295
    =2310
Solution (5) sensititvity analysis - how the "interest rate" and its variation will affect the results?
Where interest rate decreased by 3% i.e. new interest rate =2%
HK$
Initial investment 50000
Present value of management fee (1000*8.9826) 7722
Present vlaue of key component replaced 7835
(10000*.9057)
Less: Present value of saved electricity cost -52777
Present value of the system (Cost) 12780
Decrease in cost =(20507-12780)*100/20507
                                  =37.68%
Working -1
Year Annual electricity saved Escalation Rate Electricity rate Annual Electricity saved PV factor @ 2% Present value of saved electricity cost
0 0 1 1.0000
1 5000 0.03 1.03 5150 0.9804 5049
2 5000 0.03 1.06 5305 0.9612 5099
3 5000 0.03 1.09 5464 0.9423 5149
4 5000 0.03 1.13 5628 0.9238 5199
5 5000 0.03 1.16 5796 0.9057 5250
6 5000 0.03 1.19 5970 0.8880 5301
7 5000 0.03 1.23 6149 0.8706 5353
8 5000 0.03 1.27 6334 0.8535 5406
9 5000 0.03 1.30 6524 0.8368 5459
10 5000 0.03 1.34 6720 0.8203 5512
Total 52777
Where interest rate increase by 3% i.e. new interest rate =8%
HK$
Initial investment 50000
Present value of management fee (1000*6.7101) 6710.1
Present vlaue of key component replaced 6806
(10000*.6806)
Less: Present value of saved electricity cost -38883
Present value of the system (Cost) 24633
Increase in cost =(24633-20507)*100/20507
                                 = 20.12%
Working - 2
Year Annual electricity saved Escalation Rate Electricity rate Annual Electricity saved PV factor @ 8% Present value of saved electricity cost
0 0 1 1.0000
1 5000 0.03 1.03 5150 0.9259 4769
2 5000 0.03 1.06 5305 0.8573 4548
3 5000 0.03 1.09 5464 0.7938 4337
4 5000 0.03 1.13 5628 0.7350 4136
5 5000 0.03 1.16 5796 0.6806 3945
6 5000 0.03 1.19 5970 0.6302 3762
7 5000 0.03 1.23 6149 0.5835 3588
8 5000 0.03 1.27 6334 0.5403 3422
9 5000 0.03 1.30 6524 0.5002 3264
10 5000 0.03 1.34 6720 0.4632 3112
Total 38883
Comment
It can be seen from result due to change in interest rate that if we reduce the interest by 3%, resulted NPV of system is reduced by 37.68% where we increase the interest rate by 3%, the resulted NPV of system by 20.12%. Hence it has convex relationship between value of system and interest rate

Related Solutions

A new renewable energy generation system has a life-time of 10 years. It is assumed that...
A new renewable energy generation system has a life-time of 10 years. It is assumed that the salvage value of the system at the end of the 10 years' life-time is negligible. The initial (Present time) investment of the system costs $50,000. The manufacturer agrees to maintain the system every year over the 10 years' life-time with a uniform annual maintenance fee of $1000/year. At the end of the 5th year, a key component should be replaced, which will cost...
Key players of renewable energy generation are assumed to be looking to implement projects to build a green power plant at the CEZ
Key players of renewable energy generation are assumed to be looking to implement projects to build a green power plant at the CEZ. One such entity, has estimated the annual costs and revenues expected from such a project as shown in the table below: Time/years Revenue/USD Cost/USD 0 $ 0 $15M 1 $5M $3M 2 $16M $1M 3 $25 M $ 0 Required Using this information, calculate the Net Present Value of the Project at a10% discount rate.                                                                           A bottom-up...
CASE STUDY:                RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES FOR ELECTRICITY GENERATION You developed an interest in the LEC...
CASE STUDY:                RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES FOR ELECTRICITY GENERATION You developed an interest in the LEC relation and the publicized cost of electricity of 10.27¢/kWh for this year. You wonder if the addition of 60 MW of wind-sourced electricity will make any difference in the LEC value for this next year. You did learn the following: This is year t = 11 for LEC computation purposes n = 25 years i = 5% per year E11 = 5.052 billion kWh...
For a renewable energy system, perform a stakeholder analysis. Determine which actors are impacted by the...
For a renewable energy system, perform a stakeholder analysis. Determine which actors are impacted by the energy system and which actors will be most likely to support the installation of the energy system. Create a table and discuss the various stakeholders and defend why they are included. Which stakeholders are most likely to support the energy system? Which stakeholders are most likely to resist the energy system? Why?
A new system has been implemented with the purpose of reducing transaction time historically at 10...
A new system has been implemented with the purpose of reducing transaction time historically at 10 minutes. A random sample of 80 transactions obtained after the implementation of the new system showed an average time of 9.5 minutes with a standard deviation of 1.5 minutes. Would you say that there has been a reduction of processing time occurred after the implementation of the new system? Formulate the hypothesis: A. Ho: µ≥9.5 . Ha: µ<9.5 B. Ho: µ>10 . Ha: µ≤10...
We have always assumed that components in a system fail independently. In life, this might not...
We have always assumed that components in a system fail independently. In life, this might not be the case. What effect does positive correlation between the lifetimes of two parallel components have on the system lifetime? Assume that the two parallel components have lifetimes that are both described by normal distributions with means of 2,000 hours and standard deviations of 150 hours. Determine the distribution of system lifetime when the two component lifetimes are independent and again when they have...
TOPIC; RENEWABLE ENERGY DESIGN A SOLAR PLANT SYSTEM TO SUPPLY A HOME MUST INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION...
TOPIC; RENEWABLE ENERGY DESIGN A SOLAR PLANT SYSTEM TO SUPPLY A HOME MUST INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION FROM BASIC CALCULATION, TOTAL KWH PER MONTH, CHOOSE BATTERY SIZE, CHOOSE ARRAY, INVERTER. PREPARE A REPORT THAT STATE ALL NEGATIVES AND POSITIVES.
We are evaluating a project that costs $1,100,000, has a life of 10 years, and has...
We are evaluating a project that costs $1,100,000, has a life of 10 years, and has no salvage value. Assume that depreciation is straight-line to zero over the life of the project. Sales are projected at 47,000 units per year. Price per unit is $50, variable cost per unit is $25, and fixed costs are $820,000 per year. The tax rate is 21 percent and we require a return of 16 percent on this project. Suppose the projections given for...
We are evaluating a project that costs $1,080,000, has a life of 10 years, and has...
We are evaluating a project that costs $1,080,000, has a life of 10 years, and has no salvage value. Assume that depreciation is straight-line to zero over the life of the project. Sales are projected at 52,000 units per year. Price per unit is $50, variable cost per unit is $30, and fixed costs are $730,000 per year. The tax rate is 25 percent and we require a return of 15 percent on this project. Suppose the projections given for...
We are evaluating a project that costs $1,140,000, has a life of 10 years, and has...
We are evaluating a project that costs $1,140,000, has a life of 10 years, and has no salvage value. Assume that depreciation is straight-line to zero over the life of the project. Sales are projected at 36,000 units per year. Price per unit is $50, variable cost per unit is $20, and fixed costs are $720,000 per year. The tax rate is 23 percent and we require a return of 12 percent on this project. Suppose the projections given for...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT