In: Accounting
The following balance sheet is for a local partnership in which the partners have become very unhappy with each other.
Cash | $ | 41,000 | Liabilities | $ | 31,000 | |
Land | 135,000 | Adams, capital | 84,000 | |||
Building | 125,000 | Baker, capital | 30,000 | |||
Carvil, capital | 62,000 | |||||
Dobbs, capital | 94,000 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 301,000 | Total liabilities and capital | $ | 301,000 | |
To avoid more conflict, the partners have decided to cease operations and sell all assets. Using this information, answer the following questions. Each question should be viewed as an independent situation related to the partnership’s liquidation.
The $10,000 cash that exceeds the partnership liabilities is to be disbursed immediately. If profits and losses are allocated to Adams, Baker, Carvil, and Dobbs on a 2:3:3:2 basis, respectively, how will the $10,000 be divided?
The $10,000 cash that exceeds the partnership liabilities is to be disbursed immediately. If profits and losses are allocated on a 2:2:3:3 basis, respectively, how will the $10,000 be divided?
The building is immediately sold for $71,000 to give total cash of $112,000. The liabilities are then paid, leaving a cash balance of $81,000. This cash is to be distributed to the partners. How much of this money will each partner receive if profits and losses are allocated to Adams, Baker, Carvil, and Dobbs on a 1:3:3:3 basis, respectively? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)
Assume that profits and losses are allocated to Adams, Baker, Carvil, and Dobbs on a 1:3:4:2 basis, respectively. How much money must the firm receive from selling the land and building to ensure that Carvil receives a portion? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)
Maximum ptentialloss of non cash assets distributed as follows: | |||||||
a) | Partner | Share of loss | New Share Capital=(Capital as per balance sheet-Share of loss) | ||||
Adams | ($260000*2/10)= | $ 52,000.00 | ($84000-$52000)= | $ 32,000.00 | |||
Baker | ($260000*3/10)= | $ 78,000.00 | ($30000-$78000)= | $ -48,000.00 | |||
Carvil | ($260000*3/10)= | $ 78,000.00 | ($62000-$78000)= | $ -16,000.00 | |||
Dobbs | ($260000*2/10)= | $ 52,000.00 | ($94000-$52000)= | $ 42,000.00 | |||
Maximum potential loss of (48000+16000)=$64000 to be absorbed from Baker and Carvil would then be allocated as follows: | Safe Capital | ||||||
Adams | (2/4)*$64000= | 32000 | ($32000-$32000)=0 | ||||
Dobbs | (2/4)*$64000= | 32000 | ($42000-$32000)=$10000 | ||||
Absorbing the final loss would leave Dobbs with a safe capital balance of $10000. | |||||||
So Dobbs receives the entire $10000 | |||||||
Non Cash Assets | |||||||
Land | $ 1,35,000.00 | ||||||
Building | $ 1,25,000.00 | ||||||
Total | $ 2,60,000.00 | ||||||
b) | |||||||
Maximum ptentialloss of non cash assets distributed as follows: | |||||||
Partner | Share of loss | New Share Capital=(Capital as per balance sheet-Share of loss) | |||||
Adams | ($260000*2/10)= | 52000 | ($84000-$52000)= | 32000 | |||
Baker | ($260000*2/10)= | 52000 | ($30000-$52000)= | -22000 | |||
Carvil | ($260000*3/10)= | 78000 | ($62000-$78000)= | -16000 | |||
Dobbs | ($260000*3/10)= | 78000 | ($94000-$78000)= | 16000 | |||
Maximum potential loss of (22000+16000)=$38000 to be absorbed from Baker and Carvil would then be allocated as follows: | Safe Capital | ||||||
Adams | (2/5)*$38000= | 15200 | ($32000-$15200)=$16800 | ||||
Dobbs | (3/5)*$38000= | 22800 | ($16000-$22800)=-$6800 | ||||
Absorbing the final loss $6800 from Dobbs would leave Adams with a safe capital balance of $10000.($16800-$6800) | |||||||
So Adams receives the entire $10000 | |||||||
Non Cash Assets | |||||||
Land | $ 1,35,000.00 | ||||||
Building | $ 1,25,000.00 | ||||||
Total | $ 2,60,000.00 | ||||||
c ) | Loss on sale of Building is distributed as follows:($125000-$71000)=$54000 | ||||||
Partner | Share of loss | New Share Capital=(Capital as per balance sheet-Share of loss) | |||||
Adams | ($54000*1/10)= | 5400 | ($84000-$5400)= | 78600 | |||
Baker | ($54000*3/10)= | 16200 | ($30000-$16200)= | 13800 | |||
Carvil | ($54000*3/10)= | 16200 | ($62000-$16200)= | 45800 | |||
Dobbs | ($54000*3/10)= | 16200 | ($94000-$16200)= | 77800 | |||
Maximum potential loss of $135000 on the land would be distributed as follows:- | |||||||
Partner | Share of loss | New Share Capital=(Capital as per balance sheet-Share of loss) | |||||
Adams | ($135000*1/10)= | $ 13,500.00 | ($78600-$13500)= | $ 65,100.00 | |||
Baker | ($135000*3/10)= | $ 40,500.00 | ($13800-$40500)= | $ -26,700.00 | |||
Carvil | ($135000*3/10)= | $ 40,500.00 | ($45800-$40500)= | $ 5,300.00 | |||
Dobbs | ($135000*3/10)= | $ 40,500.00 | ($77800-$40500)= | $ 37,300.00 | |||
Maximum potential loss of $26700 to be absorbed from Baker would be allocated as follows: | |||||||
Partners | Share of loss | New Capital | |||||
Adams | ($26700*1/7)= | $ 3,814 | ($65100-$3814)= | $ 61,286.00 | |||
Carvil | ($26700*3/7)= | $ 11,443 | ($5300-$11443)= | $ -6,143.00 | |||
Dobbs | ($26700*3/7)= | $ 11,443 | ($37300-$11443)= | $ 25,857.00 | |||
Maximum potential loss of $6143 to be absorbed from Carvil would be allocated as follows: | |||||||
Partners | Share of loss | New Capital | |||||
Adams | (6143*1/4) | $ 1,536 | ($61286-$1536)= | $ 59,750 | |||
Dobbs | (6143*1/4) | $ 1,536 | ($25857-$1536)= | $ 24,321 | |||
These amount of $58750 of Adams and $24321 of Dobbs is safe capital for distribution purpose. | |||||||
d) | Schedule 1 | ||||||
Partner | Capital Balance/Loss allocation | Maximum loss that can be absorbed | |||||
Adams | ($84000/10%)= | $ 8,40,000.00 | |||||
Baker | ($30000/30%)= | $ 1,00,000.00 | (most vulnerable) | ||||
Carvil | ($62000/40%)= | $ 1,55,000.00 | |||||
Dobbs | ($94000/20%)= | $ 2,35,000.00 | |||||
Schedule 2 | |||||||
Partner | Capital Balance/Loss allocation | Maximum loss that can be absorbed | |||||
Adams | ($74000/(1/7))= | $ 5,18,000.00 | |||||
Carvil | ($22000/(4/7)= | $ 38,500.00 | (most Vulnerable) | ||||
Dobbs | ($74000/(2/7)= | $ 2,59,000.00 | |||||
Schedule 3 | |||||||
Partner | Capital Balance/Loss allocation | Maximum loss that can be absorbed | |||||
Adams | ($68500/(1/3) | $ 2,05,500.00 | |||||
Dobbs | ($63000/(2/3)= | $ 94,500.00 | (most Vulnerable) | ||||
Adams | Baker | Carvil | Dobbs | ||||
Capital Balance | $ 84,000.00 | $ 30,000.00 | $ 62,000.00 | $ 94,000.00 | |||
Assumbed loss of $100000 as per schedule 1 in the ratio of (1:3:4:2) | $ -10,000.00 | $ -30,000.00 | $ -40,000.00 | $ -20,000.00 | |||
Balance as per step 1 | $ 74,000.00 | $ - | $ 22,000.00 | $ 74,000.00 | |||
Assumbed loss of $38500 as per schedule 2 in the ratio of (1:4:2) | $ -5,500.00 | $ -22,000.00 | $ -11,000.00 | ||||
Balance as per step 2 | $ 68,500.00 | $ - | $ - | $ 63,000.00 | |||
Assumbed loss of $94500 as per schedule 3 in the ratio of (1:2) | $ -31,500.00 | $ -63,000.00 | |||||
Balance as per step 3 | $ 37,000.00 | $ - | $ - | $ - | |||
The Carvil capital balance is eliminated through $100000 step 1 and $38500 as per step 2 loss. This avoiding complete $138500 loss ensure that Carvil will recive cash. | |||||||
Since the land and building has a book value $260000, such losses would be avoiding by receiving ($260000-$138500)=$121500 | |||||||
The land and building must be sold for over $121500. |