Question

Eric Johnson was recently promoted to Controller of Research and Development (R&D) for LUX Pharma, a Fortune 500 pharmaceutical company, which manufactures prescription drugs and nutritional supplements. The company’s total R&D cost for 2012 was expected (budgeted) to be $5 billion. During the company’s mid-year budget review, Eric realized that current R&D expenditures were already at $3.5 billion, nearly 40% above the mid-year target. At this current rate of expenditure, the R&D division was on track to exceed its total year-end budget by $2 billion!

In a meeting with CFO, James Clark, later that day, Johnson delivered the bad news. Clark was both

shocked and outraged that the R&D spending had gotten out of control. Clark wasn’t any more understanding when Johnson revealed that the excess cost was entirely related to research and development of a new drug, Lyricon, which was expected to go to market next year. The new drug would result in large profits for LUX Pharma, if the product could be approved by year-end. Clark had already announced his expectations of third quarter earnings to Wall Street analysts. If

the R&D expenditures weren’t reduced by the end of the third quarter, Clark was certain that the targets he had announced publicly would be missed and the company’s stock price would tumble. Clark instructed Johnson to make up the budget short-fall by the end of the third quarter using “whatever means necessary.” Johnson was new to the Controller’s position and wanted to make sure that Clark’s orders were followed. Johnson came up with the following ideas for making the third quarter budgeted targets:

a. Stop all research and development efforts on the drug Lyricon until after year-end. This change would delay the drug going to market by at least six months. It is also possible that in the meantime a

LUX Pharma competitor could make it to market with a similar drug.

b. Sell off rights to the drug, Markapro. The company had not planned on doing this because, under current market conditions, it would get less than fair value. It would, however, result in a onetime gain that could offset the budget short-fall. Of course, all future profits from Markapro would be lost.

c. Capitalize some of the company’s R&D expenditures reducing R&D expense on the income statement. This transaction would not be in accordance with accounting standards, but Johnson thought it was justifiable, since the Lyricon drug was going to market early next year. Johnson would argue that capitalizing R & D costs this year and expensing them next year would better match revenues and expenses.

REQUIRED:

1. Referring to the “Standards of Ethical Behavior for Practitioners of Management Accounting and Financial Management,” which of the preceding items (a–c) are acceptable to use? Which are unacceptable? EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWERS

2. What would you recommend Johnson do? Explain in details.

Answer 1

The practioners of managment accounting and financial management have responsibities towards themselves, public and organisations in which they work to maintain the ethical code of conduct so with reference to these institute of managment accounting issued some guidelines in refrence to the codes to be followed by each practioners. one of the ethical guideline was to Perform their professional duties in accordance with relevant laws, regulations, and technical standards.and Maintain an appropriate level of professional competence by ongoing development of their knowledge and skills. so

• Option A & B are feasible as per "Standards of Ethical Behaviour". But option C is Unacceptable as it is not following the law and also doesn't match with the guidelines issued.

  Option B is recommended amonst the options given as this will incurr cash inflow in company since Option A would reduce cost for 6 months only but in the next quarter the cost is bound to happen.