In: Economics
How can we tell the difference between AD shock and an AS shock
AD shock and AS shock
aggregate demand
shock:
In economics, a demand shock is a sudden event that
increases or decreases demand for goods or services temporarily. A
positive demand shock increases aggregate demand (AD) and a
negative demand shock decreases aggregate demand. ... When the
taxpayers use the money to purchase goods and services, their
prices go up.
example:
A demand shock is a large but transitory disruption of the market
price for a product or service, caused by an unexpected event that
changes the perception and demand. An earthquake, a terrorist
event, a technological advance, and a government stimulus program
can all cause a demand shock
Demand
Shock:
A demand shock is a sudden unexpected event that dramatically
increases or decreases demand for a product or service, usually
temporarily. A positive demand shock is a sudden increase in
demand, while a negative demand shock is a decrease in demand.
Either shock will have an effect on the prices of the product or
service. A demand shock may be contrasted with a supply shock,
which is a sudden change in the supply of a product or service that
causes an observable economic
effect. Supply and demand shocks are
examples of economic shocks.
A demand shock is a large but transitory disruption of the market price for a product or service, caused by an unexpected event that changes the perception and demand.
Positive demand shocks have the effect of increasing aggregate demand in the economy, leading to increased consumption.
Examples of positive demand shocks include:
1 Interest rate cuts
2 Tax cuts
3 Government stimulus
Companies anticipating increased revenues may respond by hiring more workers or expanding operations. This increase in hiring and economic activity feeds back to lead to even more consumption. One drawback of a positive demand shock is that it can lead to higher prices if the economy is near full capacity, which heightens inflation risks.
Negative economic shocks have the effect of creating fear. In this mindset, people are more inclined to save rather than consume.
Examples of negative demand shocks include:
1 Terrorist attacks
2 Natural disasters
3 Stock market crashes
In times of negative demand shocks, people are less inclined to take risks to start a business or pursue an education, which are activities integral to economic growth. Although these decisions may be rational on an individual basis, on an aggregate basis, it can lead to crippling economic losses. To balance such a negative demand shock, governments may be inclined to lower interest rates, cut taxes or increase spending to reverse a self-reinforcing negative spiral. This is essentially intended to introduce a positive demand shock to counteract a negative one.
Aggregate Demand
:
Aggregate demand is an economic measurement of the total amount of
demand for all finished goods and services produced in an economy.
Aggregate demand is expressed as the total amount of money
exchanged for those goods and services at a specific price level
and point in time.
Aggregate Demand
Controversy :
As we saw in the economy in 2008 and 2009, aggregate demand
declined. However, there is much debate among economists as to
whether aggregate demand slowed, leading to lower growth or GDP
contracted, leading to less aggregate demand. Whether demand leads
growth or vice versa is economists' version of the age-old question
of what came first—the chicken or the egg.
The relationship between growth and aggregate demand has been the subject major debates in economic theory for many years.
Early economic theories hypothesized that production is the source of demand. The 18th-century French classical liberal economist Jean-Baptiste Say stated that consumption is limited to productive capacity and that social demands are essentially limitless, a theory referred to as Say's law.
Say's law ruled until the 1930s, with the advent of the theories of British economist John Maynard Keynes. Keynes, by arguing that demand drives supply, placed total demand in the driver's seat. Keynesian macroeconomists have since believed that stimulating aggregate demand will increase real future output. According to their demand-side theory, the total level of output in the economy is driven by the demand for goods and services and propelled by money spent on those goods and services. In other words, producers look to rising levels of spending as an indication to increase production.
Keynes further argued that individuals could end up damaging production by limiting current expenditures—by hoarding money, for example. Other economists argue that hoarding can impact prices but does not necessarily change capital accumulation, production, or future output. In other words, the effect of an individual's saving money—more capital available for business—does not disappear on account of a lack of spending.
Limitations of
Aggregate Demand :
Aggregate demand is helpful in determining the overall strength of consumers and businesses in an economy. Since aggregate demand is measured by market values, it only represents total output at a given price level and does not necessarily represent quality or standard of living.
Also, aggregate demand measures many different economic transactions between millions of individuals and for different purposes. As a result, it can become challenging when trying to determine the causality of demand and run a regression analysis, which is used to determine how many variables or factors influence demand and to what extent.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
: