Question

In: Statistics and Probability

Lead time bias will make it appear that the apparent survival time in the non-screened population...

Lead time bias will make it appear that the apparent survival time in the non-screened population to be _____________ than the survival time in a similar screened population.
Select one:

Select one:

a. No different

b. Greater

c. Less

d. It is impossible to compare these populations

Solutions

Expert Solution

answer is C) less.

Lead time bias will make it appear that the apparent survival time in the non-screened population to be less than the survival time in a similar screened population.

  The premise of screening is that it allows you to identify disease earlier, so you can initiate treatment at an early stage in order to effect cure or at least longer survival. Screening can give you a jump on the disease; this "lead-time" is a good thing, but it can bias the efficacy of screening. The two subjects to the right have the same age, same time of disease onset, the same DPCP, and the same time of death. However, if we compare survival time from the point of diagnosis, the subject whose disease was identified through screening appears to survive longer, but only because their disease was identified earlier.


Related Solutions

3. What is LEAD TIME BIAS? How does LEAD TIME BIAS affect the statistics showing survival...
3. What is LEAD TIME BIAS? How does LEAD TIME BIAS affect the statistics showing survival rates for cancer? How does this affect YOUR feeling towards screening tests?
What is meant by “bias due to selective survival” in cross-sectional studies? (In your answer, make...
What is meant by “bias due to selective survival” in cross-sectional studies? (In your answer, make sure to define appropriate selection probability parameters.) Under what circumstances might there be no selective survival bias even if the selection probabilities are not all equal? Suppose that you could assess that the direction of possible selective survival bias in your study was towards the null. If your study data yielded a non-statistically significant odds ratio of 1.04, would it be correct to conclude...
Natural history of disease and benefits/drawbacks of screening (e.g., diagnoses, lead time bias, actual death, extended...
Natural history of disease and benefits/drawbacks of screening (e.g., diagnoses, lead time bias, actual death, extended survival, etc.) What is Generalizability (and what assumptions or conditions need to be met) Compare and contrast Bias (recall, sample, information, interviewer, etc.)
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT