Question

In: Economics

Consider three mutually exclusive alternatives, each with a 20 year life span and no salvage value....

  1. Consider three mutually exclusive alternatives, each with a 20 year life span and no salvage value. The minimum attractive rate of return is 6%.

A                         B                           C

Initial Cost                                     $4000                 $8000                           $10,000

Uniform Annual Benefit ($)            410                     639                           700

Find the preferred alternative based on an analysis of your choice. Also estimate the sensitivity of this alternative to changes in the cost and benefit structure

  1. A firm is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives as part of a production improvement program. The alternatives are as follows:

A                         B                            C

Installed Cost ($)                                   10,000                 15,000                 20,000

Uniform Annual benefit ($)                    1,625            1,625                  2000

Useful life (Years)                                 20                 20                       20         

For each alternative, the salvage value is zero. The MARR is 6%. Which alternative should be selected based on the INCREMENTAL ANALYSIS method?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Alternative A will be chosen as the NPV is postive compared to the other two alternatives whose NPV are negetive.


Related Solutions

Consider 3 mutually exclusive alternatives, each with a 10-year useful life. If the Minimum Attractive Rate...
Consider 3 mutually exclusive alternatives, each with a 10-year useful life. If the Minimum Attractive Rate of Return (MARR) is 14.5%, which alternative should be selected? Solve the problem using benefit-cost ratio analysis. Alternative Choice #1 Choice #2 Choice #3 Cost 810 305 145 Uniform Annual Benefit 131 62 36
Consider the mutually exclusive alternatives given in the table below. MARR is 5 % per year....
Consider the mutually exclusive alternatives given in the table below. MARR is 5 % per year. Assuming repeatability, what is the equivalent annual worth of the most profitable alternative? (Do not enter the dollar sign $ with your answer.)                 _____________________________________________________________                                                                  X                     Y                        Z                 _____________________________________________________________                 Capital investment             $50,000            $25,000          $40,000                 Annual savings                  $15,000           $8,000           $12,000                 Useful life (years)                10                   15                 20                 _____________________________________________________________________________
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. Which alternative would you select?
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 12​% per year. At the end of the useful​ life, the investment will be sold. A​ decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. X Y Z Investment cost ​$275,000 ​$140,000 ​$370,000 Annual revenue ​$85,840 ​$53,207 ​$93,911 Annual cost ​$23,183 ​$14,370 ​$20,543 Useful life 15 years...
Final Finishing is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives for a new polisher. Each alternative has an...
Final Finishing is considering three mutually exclusive alternatives for a new polisher. Each alternative has an expected life of 10 years and no salvage value. Polisher I requires an initial investment of $20,000 and provides annual benefits of $4,465. Polisher II requires an initial investment of $10,000 and provides annual benefits of $1,770. Polisher III requires an initial investment of $15,000 and provides annual benefits of $3,580. MARR is 15%/yr. Based on an internal rate of return analysis, which polisher...
Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The study period is 30 years and the​ firm's MARR is 17% per year. Assume repeatability and reinvestment of positive cash balances at 17​% per year. a. What is the simple payback period for Alternative​ 1? b. What is the annual worth of Alternative​ 2? c. What is the IRR of the incremental cash flows of Alternative 2 compared to Alternative​ 1?...
Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive investment alternatives are being considered. The estimated cash flows for each alternative are given below. The study period is 30 years and the​ firm's MARR is 10​% per year. Assume repeatability and reinvestment of positive cash balances at 10​% per year. a. What is the simple payback period for Alternative​ 1? b. What is the annual worth of Alternative​ 2? c. What is the IRR of the incremental cash flows of Alternative 2 compared to Alternative​ 1?...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are...
Three mutually exclusive design alternatives are beimg considered. The estimated cah flows for each alternative are given below. The MARR is 20% per year. At the conclusion of the useful life, the investment will be sold. A decision-maker can select one of these alternatives or decide to select none of them. Make a recommendation using the PW method. Which alternative would you select?
Consider the following three mutually exclusive investment project alternatives (A, B, C). Use the annual worth...
Consider the following three mutually exclusive investment project alternatives (A, B, C). Use the annual worth analysis (AW) to determine the best investment alternative assuming MARR=15%. Project name:                                        A                    B                    C Cash Flow (Year 0):                                    -200,000        -300,000        -400,000 Cash Flow (Year 1-N)                     +150,000       +180,000       +150,000 Salvage value at year N:                +30,000         +50,000          +60,000 Project Life (N):                                    2 years         3 years          6 years
There are three mutually exclusive alternatives, as vendors to outsource a project, with the following cash...
There are three mutually exclusive alternatives, as vendors to outsource a project, with the following cash flow and useful life. Which of these three alternatives would you recommend to be selected? The MARR is 10% per year. Vendor 1 Vendor 2 Vendor 3 First Cost $60,000 $35,000 $25,000 Annual operating and maintenance cost $3,000 every 4 years $1,000 per year $2,000 in yr 1 and it increases by $200 every year thereafter Salvage value $10,000 $4,000 $3,000 Useful life, years...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT