In: Nursing
HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT SCHOOLS OF THOUGTS
Schools of management thought have evolved over the past century to provide conceptual maps of how to deal with internal and external challenges. These conceptual maps include theories of how things work, what causes what, and how to act. The theories are not mutually exclusive and can serve as multidimensional or multilayered models to guide managerial action. Executives benefit from being familiar with, and adept at using, many of these conceptual maps.
PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTION (and parts if applicable) in at least 250 words or more. Please do not copy and past, use your own words.
1. Explain and provide details/explanations of the following healthcare terms; Early Writings on bureaucracy and Organization by Weber, Frederick Taylor and Scientific management, Classical School of Administration by Gulick, Human Relations School, Contingency Theory of Leadership, Decision-making School.
b) what is Institutional Theory according to Selznick (1957)?
c)
Early Writings on bureaucracy and Organization by Weber
Key Points
Key Terms
Frederick Taylor and Scientific management
Key Points
The Principles of Taylor's Scientific Management Theory became widely practiced, and the resulting cooperation between workers and managers eventually developed into the teamwork we enjoy today. While Taylorism in a pure sense isn't practiced much today, scientific management did provide many significant contributions to the advancement of management practice. It introduced systematic selection and training procedures, it provided a way to study workplace efficiency, and it encouraged the idea of systematic organizational design.
Taylor's four principles are as follows:
Classical School of Administration by Gulick
The classical theory projects public administration as a science
Gulick went ahead to identify 10 principles on which the organizational structure can be designed. Below are the 10 principles as listed by Gulick:
Human Relations School
The human relations management theory is a researched belief that people desire to be part of a supportive team that facilitates development and growth. Therefore, if employees receive special attention and are encouraged to participate, they perceive their work has significance, and they are motivated to be more productive, resulting in high quality work. The following human relations management theory basics became evident during human relation studies:
1. Individual attention and recognition aligns with the human relations theory.
2. Many theorists supported the motivational theory.
3. Studies supported the importance of human relations in business.
Contingency Theory of Leadership
In the contingency theory of leadership, the success of the leader is a function of various contingencies in the form of subordinate, task, and/or group variables. The effectiveness of a given pattern of leader behavior is contingent upon the demands imposed by the situation.
To understand this theory we should examine the individual leader, the organizational factors (or leadership situation), and the interaction of these factors. As per this model, leader effectiveness is based on two factors, "the leadership style" and "the situational favorableness" (also known as "situational control"). In short, the contingency theory is concerned with styles and situations.
Decision-making School.
School-based decision-making is a concept based on the fundamental principle that individuals who are affected by the decision, possess expertise regarding the decision, and are responsible for implementing the decision, should be involved in making decisions.
Key Elements
School-based decision-making rests on two well-established propositions:
B) Institutional Theory according to Selznick (1957)
Selnick notes that "the most important thing about organizations is that, though they are tools, each nevertheless has a life of its own"
While he acknowledges rational view that organizations are
designed to attain goals, he notes that the formal structures can
never conquer the non-rational dimenstions of organizational
behavior. Individuals do not act purely based on their formal
roles. Organizations do not act purely based on formal
structures.
Selznick notes that individuals bring other commitments to the
organization that can restrict rational decision-making.
Organizational procedures become valued as ends in themselves. The
organization strikes bargains with the environment that can
restrict it's current goals or limit future possibilities
.Organizational structures adapt based on individual actions and
environmental pressures.
He states that the overriding need for systems "is the maintenance
of the integrity and continuity of the system itself" He defines
"derived imperatives":
* security of organization within it's environment
* stability of informal relations within the organization
* homogeneity of outlook toward meaning and role of the
organization
He suggests focusing on the irregular actions to meet unmet needs
within organizations as a more interesting area of study. He
recommends studying an organization over time and focusing on the
critical decisions that change its structure. He defines
institutionalization as "the process by which an organization
develops a distinctive character structure". Leaders are supposed
to define the mission and protect it's distinctive character.
"Institutional commitments develop over time as the organization
confronts external constaints and pressures from its environment as
well as changes in the composition of its personnel, their
interests, and their informal relations". Selznick proposes to
study the natural history of organizations.
Selnick's work not only spawned the institutional school, his view that leaders need to define and defend organizational distinctive character led to focus on strategic decision-making and creating organizational cultures.