In: Accounting
Kelly Kneppy owns a company that manufactures and sells camping equipment and outdoor
gear. Kelly’s latest creation is the Bear-B-Gone, a tent constructed of Kevlar and reinforced steel
mesh that could theoretically protect campers (who hadn’t followed appropriate food storage
guidelines) from bear attacks. Kelly believes the Bear-B-Gone offers many of the same desirable
features as other tents on the market, and that this extreme safety feature will make it one of the
best-selling tents in short order.
Kelly can make the Bear-B-Gone with one of two available technologies. The first is a labor-
intensive process, that if chosen will require $600,000 per year in fixed overhead costs, and the
following in variable costs of production per unit: direct materials of $75, direct labor of $75,
and overhead of $20. The second technology is a more automated (machine-dependent) process,
that if chosen will require $2,000,000 per year in fixed overhead costs, and the following in
variable costs of production: direct materials of $75, direct labor of $5, and overhead of $60.
Kelly believes she can sell the tent for $200.
1. Suppose possible sales are expected to range between 40,000 and 60,000 units as noted
above, and that production will equal sales (no beginning/ending inventory). Which
process has the greater range in profit? Why might this be a factor for Kelly to consider in making her decision?
Assume sales were to fall at the midpoint of the projections above, 50,000 units.
Now, under which process would you say Kelly’s profit
is more sensitive to changes in demand (sales)? Why? Does this make one of the options
strictly “better” than the other? Why or why not?
Profitability analysis under both methods :
Method 1: Labor intensive method:
No. of units | 40000 | 50000 | 60000 |
Sales per unit | 200 | 200 | 200 |
Variable cost per unit | |||
Direct material | 75 | 75 | 75 |
Direct Labor | 75 | 75 | 75 |
VOH | 20 | 20 | 20 |
Total variable cost per unit | 170 | 170 | 170 |
Contribution per unit | 30 | 30 | 30 |
Total contribution | 1200000 | 1500000 | 1800000 |
Fixed cost | 600000 | 600000 | 600000 |
Profit | 6,00,000 | 9,00,000 | 12,00,000 |
Method 2: More automated process
No. of units | 40000 | 50000 | 60000 |
Sales per unit | 200 | 200 | 200 |
Variable cost per unit | |||
Direct material | 75 | 75 | 75 |
Direct Labor | 5 | 5 | 5 |
VOH | 60 | 60 | 60 |
Total variable cost per unit | 140 | 140 | 140 |
Contribution per unit | 60 | 60 | 60 |
Total contribution | 2400000 | 3000000 | 3600000 |
Fixed cost | 2000000 | 2000000 | 2000000 |
Profit | 4,00,000 | 10,00,000 | 16,00,000 |
Range given 40,000 - 60,000
Therefore with the above working it is clear that as range 40,000 units Method A is preferred due to high profits
and at range 60,000 units Method B is preferred due to high profit.
If the sales are at mid point 50,000 units method 2 is preferred due to high profit.
Bottom line : 0 - 40,000 units = method A is preferred (Fixed cost is low)
> 40,000 units = Method B is preferred (Variable cost is low)
Since 50,000 falls in >40,000 units Method B is preferred.