Question

1. How has the economic activity as a geographical force changed the natural environment? Provide example(s) of these events.

2. How has the current administration cut back on environmental protection? Can corporate leaders influence our thinking about environment, social, and governance issues? Any examples?

3. Banning live wildlife markets is a very positive, but challenging endeavor. However, according to Jamie Clark, President and CEO of Defenders, there is another major issue that can't be ignored. Describe this issue and its impact upon live markets and on the world stage.

Answer 1

Ans.

1.

Economic growth implies an expansion in genuine yield (genuine GDP). In this manner, with expanded yield and utilization we are probably going to see costs forced on the environment. The environmental effect of economic growth incorporates the expanded utilization of non-sustainable assets, more elevated levels of contamination, an Earth-wide temperature boost and the expected loss of environmental living spaces.

Nonetheless, not all types of economic growth cause harm to the environment. With rising genuine salaries, people have a more noteworthy capacity to give assets to ensuring the environment and relieve the destructive impacts of contamination. Likewise, economic growth brought about by improved innovation can empower higher yield with less contamination.

The PPF curveshows a compromise between non-inexhaustible assets and utilization. As we increment utilization, the open door cost suggests a lower supply of non-inexhaustible assets.

For instance, the movement of worldwide economic growth in the previous century has prompted a decrease in the accessibility of characteristic assets, for example, backwoods (cut down for agribusiness/interest for wood)

- A decrease in wellsprings of oil/coal/gas

- Loss of fishing stocks – due to overfishing

- Loss of species decent variety – harm to common assets has prompted species annihilation.

An Earth-wide temperature boost and unpredictable climate. A worldwide temperature alteration prompts rising ocean levels, unpredictable climate designs and could cause huge economic expenses

- Soil disintegration. Deforestation coming about because of economic development harms soil and makes zones more inclined to dry season.

- Loss of biodiversity. Economic growth prompts asset consumption and loss of biodiversity. This could hurt future 'conveying limit of biological frameworks' for the economy. In spite of the fact that there is vulnerability about the degree of this expense as the advantage of lost hereditary guides may never be known.

2)

The Trump administration declared that they will move back some security quantifies that manage seaward boring tasks.

The past arrangement of wellbeing rules were executed in 2010, after an unfortunate blast at a BP oil well in the Gulf of Mexico slaughtered 11 individuals and gushed out more than 200 million gallons of oil into the ocean. Oil from the debacle damaged the close by coasts and remote oceans for quite a long time a while later.

After the blast, the Obama administration fixed wellbeing rules for seaward penetrating tasks. Among different measures, they required more tests on "victory preventers" and different pieces of the boring mechanical assemblies and required security checks from autonomous agents. The new rollbacks decrease or cancel these wellbeing measures.

The rollbacks were invited by pioneers in the oil and gas industry and censured by numerous environmental gatherings.