Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A sample of 18 joint specimens of a particular type gave a sample mean proportional limit...

A sample of 18 joint specimens of a particular type gave a sample mean proportional limit stress of 8.54 MPa and a sample standard deviation of 0.71 MPa.

(a) Calculate and interpret a 95% lower confidence bound for the true average proportional limit stress of all such joints. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)

Interpret this bound.

With 95% confidence, we can say that the value of the true mean proportional limit stress of all such joints is less than this value.

With 95% confidence, we can say that the value of the true mean proportional limit stress of all such joints is greater than this value.

With 95% confidence, we can say that the value of the true mean proportional limit stress of all such joints is centered around this value.

What, if any, assumptions did you make about the distribution of proportional limit stress?

We do not need to make any assumptions.

We must assume that the sample observations were taken from a normally distributed population.   

We must assume that the sample observations were taken from a chi-square distributed population.

We must assume that the sample observations were taken from a uniformly distributed population.

(b) Calculate and interpret a 95% lower prediction bound for proportional limit stress of a single joint of this type. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)

Interpret this bound.

If this bound is calculated for sample after sample, in the long run 95% of these bounds will be centered around this value for the corresponding future values of the proportional limit stress of a single joint of this type.

If this bound is calculated for sample after sample, in the long run 95% of these bounds will provide a higher bound for the corresponding future values of the proportional limit stress of a single joint of this type.

   If this bound is calculated for sample after sample, in the long run, 95% of these bounds will provide a lower bound for the corresponding future values of the proportional limit stress of a single joint of this type.

Solutions

Expert Solution

a)

sample std dev ,    s =    0.7100
Sample Size ,   n =    18
Sample Mean,    x̅ =   8.5400

Level of Significance ,    α =    0.05          
degree of freedom=   DF=n-1=   17          
't value='   tα/2= 1.740 [Excel formula =t.inv(α,df) ]      
                  
Standard Error , SE = s/√n =   0.710   / √   18   =   0.1673
margin of error , E=t*SE = 1.740 *   0.167   = 0.291
                  
confidence interval is                   
Interval Lower Limit = x̅ - E =    8.54   - 0.291 = 8.25

With 95% confidence, we can say that the value of the true mean proportional limit stress of all such joints is greater than this value.

We must assume that the sample observations were taken from a normally distributed population.   

b)

margin of error for prediction interval,E=   t*s*√(1+1/n)= 1.269
prediction interval is       
Interval Lower Limit=   x̅ - E = 7.27

   If this bound is calculated for sample after sample, in the long run, 95% of these bounds will provide a lower bound for the corresponding future values of the proportional limit stress of a single joint of this type.


Related Solutions

A sample of 13 joint specimens of a particular type gave a sample mean proportional limit...
A sample of 13 joint specimens of a particular type gave a sample mean proportional limit stress of 8.56 MPa and a sample standard deviation of 0.75 MPa. (a) Calculate and interpret a 95% lower confidence bound for the true average proportional limit stress of all such joints. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) (b) Calculate and interpret a 95% lower prediction bound for proportional limit stress of a single joint of this type. (Round your answer to two...
A sample of 16 joint specimens of a particular type gave a sample mean proportional limit...
A sample of 16 joint specimens of a particular type gave a sample mean proportional limit stress of 8.44 MPa and a sample standard deviation of 0.73 MPa. (a) Calculate and interpret a 95% lower confidence bound for the true average proportional limit stress of all such joints. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) (b) Calculate and interpret a 95% lower prediction bound for proportional limit stress of a single joint of this type. (Round your answer to two...
A sample of 16 joint specimens of a particular type gave a sample mean proportional limit...
A sample of 16 joint specimens of a particular type gave a sample mean proportional limit stress of 8.55 MPa and a sample standard deviation of 0.79 MPa. a)Calculate and interpret a 95% lower confidence bound for the true average proportional limit stress of all such joints. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) b)Calculate and interpret a 95% lower prediction bound for proportional limit stress of a single joint of this type. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
#1) A sample of 12 joint specimens of a particular type gave a sample mean proportional...
#1) A sample of 12 joint specimens of a particular type gave a sample mean proportional limit stress of 8.57 MPa and a sample standard deviation of 0.78 MPa. (a) Calculate and interpret a 95% lower confidence bound for the true average proportional limit stress of all such joints. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) _______ MPa Interpret this bound. (pick one) o With 95% confidence, we can say that the value of the true mean proportional limit stress...
A random sample of n1 = 18 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution...
A random sample of n1 = 18 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution index x1 = 43. Previous studies show that σ1 = 13. For Englewood (a suburb of Denver), a random sample of n2 = 17 winter days gave a sample mean pollution index of x2 = 48. Previous studies show that σ2 = 15. Assume the pollution index is normally distributed in both Englewood and Denver. Do these data indicate that the mean population pollution...
An Izod impact test was performed on 20 specimens of PVC pipe. The sample mean is...
An Izod impact test was performed on 20 specimens of PVC pipe. The sample mean is x Overscript bar EndScripts equals 1.44 and the sample standard deviation is s = 0.27. Find a 99% lower confidence bound on the true Izod impact strength. Assume the data are normally distributed. Round your answer to 3 decimal places. less-than-or-equal-to
An Izod Impact Test was performed on 20 specimens of PVC pipe. The sample mean is...
An Izod Impact Test was performed on 20 specimens of PVC pipe. The sample mean is ? = 1.25, and the sample ??? ??????? ? standard deviation is ? = 0.25. You need to test if the true mean Izod Impact Strength is less than 1.5. a.Write down the Null and Alternative Hypotheses to be tested b.What is the appropriate type of statistical test? Explain. c.Construct a 95% ?????????? ???????? and test the Hypotheses. Clearly interpret the test result. d.Test...
A random sample of n1 = 10 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution...
A random sample of n1 = 10 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution index x1 = 43. Previous studies show that σ1 = 21. For Englewood (a suburb of Denver), a random sample of n2 = 12 winter days gave a sample mean pollution index of x2 = 36. Previous studies show that σ2 = 13. Assume the pollution index is normally distributed in both Englewood and Denver. (a) Do these data indicate that the mean population...
A random sample of n1 = 14 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution...
A random sample of n1 = 14 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution index x1 = 43. Previous studies show that σ1 = 21. For Englewood (a suburb of Denver), a random sample of n2 = 16 winter days gave a sample mean pollution index of x2 = 35. Previous studies show that σ2 = 13. Assume the pollution index is normally distributed in both Englewood and Denver. What is the value of the sample test statistic?...
A random sample of n1 = 22 summer days in Los Angeles gave a sample mean...
A random sample of n1 = 22 summer days in Los Angeles gave a sample mean pollution index of x-bar1 = 49. Previous studies show that σ1 = 12. For San Francisco, a random sample of n2 = 17 summer days gave a sample mean pollution index of x-bar2 = 45. Previous studies show that σ2 = 15. Assume the pollution index is normally distributed. Do these data indicate the mean population pollution index of Los Angeles is greater than...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT