Question

In: Statistics and Probability

A random sample of n1 = 18 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution...

A random sample of n1 = 18 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution index x1 = 43. Previous studies show that σ1 = 13. For Englewood (a suburb of Denver), a random sample of n2 = 17 winter days gave a sample mean pollution index of x2 = 48. Previous studies show that σ2 = 15. Assume the pollution index is normally distributed in both Englewood and Denver. Do these data indicate that the mean population pollution index of Englewood is different (either way) from that of Denver in the winter? Use a 1% level of significance.

(a) What sampling distribution will you use? What assumptions are you making?

A. The Student's t. We assume that both population distributions are approximately normal with unknown standard deviations.

B. The standard normal. We assume that both population distributions are approximately normal with unknown standard deviations.  

C. The standard normal. We assume that both population distributions are approximately normal with known standard deviations.

D. The Student's t. We assume that both population distributions are approximately normal with known standard deviations


(b) What is the value of the sample test statistic? (Test the difference μ1 − μ2. Round your answer to two decimal places.)


(c) Find (or estimate) the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places)


(d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level α?

A. At the α = 0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.

B. At the α = 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.    

C. At the α = 0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.

D. At the α = 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.


(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.

A. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that there is a difference in mean pollution index for Englewood and Denver.

B. Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that there is a difference in mean pollution index for Englewood and Denver.

C. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that there is a difference in mean pollution index for Englewood and Denver

D. .Reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that there is a difference in mean pollution index for Englewood and Denver.

Solutions

Expert Solution

a)

C. The standard normal. We assume that both population distributions are approximately normal with known standard deviations.

b)

Pooled Variance
sp = sqrt(s1^2/n1 + s2^2/n2)
sp = sqrt(169/18 + 225/17)
sp = 4.7565

Test statistic,
z = (x1bar - x2bar)/sp
z = (43 - 48)/4.7565
z = -1.05


c)

P-value Approach
P-value = 0.2937
As P-value >= 0.01, fail to reject null hypothesis.


d)

D. At the α = 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.

e)

A. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that there is a difference in mean pollution index for Englewood and Denver.


Related Solutions

A random sample of n1 = 10 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution...
A random sample of n1 = 10 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution index x1 = 43. Previous studies show that σ1 = 21. For Englewood (a suburb of Denver), a random sample of n2 = 12 winter days gave a sample mean pollution index of x2 = 36. Previous studies show that σ2 = 13. Assume the pollution index is normally distributed in both Englewood and Denver. (a) Do these data indicate that the mean population...
A random sample of n1 = 14 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution...
A random sample of n1 = 14 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution index x1 = 43. Previous studies show that σ1 = 21. For Englewood (a suburb of Denver), a random sample of n2 = 16 winter days gave a sample mean pollution index of x2 = 35. Previous studies show that σ2 = 13. Assume the pollution index is normally distributed in both Englewood and Denver. What is the value of the sample test statistic?...
a random sample of n1=12 winter days in denver gave a sample meanpollution index of xbar...
a random sample of n1=12 winter days in denver gave a sample meanpollution index of xbar 1=43. previous studies show that standarddeviation1= 21. for englewood, a random sample of n2= 14 winterdays gave a sample mean pollution index of xbar2= 36. previousstudies show standard deviation 2 = 15. assume the pollution indexis normally distributed in both englewood and denver. do these data indicate that the mean population pollutionindex of englewood is different (either way) from that of denver inthe winter?...
A random sample of n1 = 22 summer days in Los Angeles gave a sample mean...
A random sample of n1 = 22 summer days in Los Angeles gave a sample mean pollution index of x-bar1 = 49. Previous studies show that σ1 = 12. For San Francisco, a random sample of n2 = 17 summer days gave a sample mean pollution index of x-bar2 = 45. Previous studies show that σ2 = 15. Assume the pollution index is normally distributed. Do these data indicate the mean population pollution index of Los Angeles is greater than...
Based on information from The Denver Post, a random sample of ?1 = 12 winter days...
Based on information from The Denver Post, a random sample of ?1 = 12 winter days in Denver gave a sample mean pollution index of ?̅1 = 43. Previous studies show that ?1 = 21. For Englewood (a suburb of Denver), a random sample ?2 = 14 winter days gave a sample mean pollution index of ?̅2 = 36. Previous studies show that ?2 = 15. Assume the pollution index is normally distributed in both Englewood and Denver. Do these...
A random sample of n1 = 16 communities in western Kansas gave the following information for...
A random sample of n1 = 16 communities in western Kansas gave the following information for people under 25 years of age. x1: Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for people under 25 96 92 120 130 91 123 112 93 125 95 125 117 97 122 127 88 A random sample of n2 = 14 regions in western Kansas gave the following information for people over 50 years old. x2: Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for...
A random sample of n1 = 16 communities in western Kansas gave the following information for...
A random sample of n1 = 16 communities in western Kansas gave the following information for people under 25 years of age. x1: Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for people under 25 96 88 122 130 90 123 112 93 125 95 125 117 97 122 127 88 A random sample of n2 = 14 regions in western Kansas gave the following information for people over 50 years old. x2: Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for...
A random sample of n1 = 16 communities in western Kansas gave the following information for...
A random sample of n1 = 16 communities in western Kansas gave the following information for people under 25 years of age. x1: Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for people under 25 100 92 122 129 94 123 112 93 125 95 125 117 97 122 127 88 A random sample of n2 = 14 regions in western Kansas gave the following information for people over 50 years old. x2: Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for...
A random sample of n1 = 16 communities in western Kansas gave the following information for...
A random sample of n1 = 16 communities in western Kansas gave the following information for people under 25 years of age. x1: Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for people under 25 98 90 120 128 92 123 112 93 125 95 125 117 97 122 127 88 A random sample of n2 = 14 regions in western Kansas gave the following information for people over 50 years old. x2: Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for...
A random sample of n1 = 16 communities in western Kansas gave the following information for...
A random sample of n1 = 16 communities in western Kansas gave the following information for people under 25 years of age. x1: Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for people under 25 100 91 119 127 93 123 112 93 125 95 125 117 97 122 127 88 A random sample of n2 = 14 regions in western Kansas gave the following information for people over 50 years old. x2: Rate of hay fever per 1000 population for...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT