In: Accounting
As you learned in the previous chapters, Current Designs has two
main product lines—composite kayaks, which are handmade and very
labor-intensive, and rotomolded kayaks, which require less labor
but employ more expensive equipment. Current Designs’ controller,
Diane Buswell, is now evaluating several different methods of
assigning overhead to these products. It is important to ensure
that costs are appropriately assigned to the company’s products. At
the same time, the system that is used must not be so complex that
its costs are greater than its benefits.
Diane has decided to use the following activities and costs to
evaluate the methods of assigning overhead.
ActivitiesCost
Designing new models$116,000
Creating and testing prototypes152,000
Creating molds for kayaks180,000
Operating oven for the rotomolded kayaks40,000
Operating the vacuum line for the composite kayaks30,000
Supervising production employees192,000
Curing time (the time that is needed for the chemical
processes to finish before the next step in the
production process; many of these costs are related
to the space required in the building)216,000
Total$926,000
As Diane examines the data, she decides that the cost of operating
the oven for the rotomolded kayaks and the cost of operating the
vacuum line for the composite kayaks can be directly assigned to
each of these product lines and do not need to be assigned with the
other costs.
For purposes of this analysis, assume that Current Designs uses
$224,000 in direct labor costs to produce 1,000 composite kayaks
and $311,000 in direct labor costs to produce 4,000 rotomolded
kayaks each year.
One method of assigning overhead would assign the common costs
to each product line by using an assignment basis such as the
number of employees working on each type of kayak or the amount of
factory space used for the production of each type of kayak. Diane
knows that about 50% of the area of the plant and 50% of the
employees work on the composite kayaks, and the remaining space and
other employees work on the rotomolded kayaks. Using this
information and remembering that the cost of operating the oven and
vacuum line have been directly assigned, determine the total amount
to be assigned to the composite kayak line and the rotomolded kayak
line, and the amount to be assigned to each of the units in each
line. (Round cost assigned per unit to 2 decimal places, e.g.
125.25.)
CompositeRotomolded
Total cost assigned$ $
Cost assigned per unit$ $
eTextbook and Media
Another method of assigning overhead is to use direct labor
dollars as an assignment basis. Remembering that the costs of the
oven and the vacuum line have been assigned directly to the product
lines, allocate the remaining costs using direct labor dollars as
the allocation basis. Then, determine the amount of overhead that
should be assigned to each unit of each product line using this
method. (Round cost assigned per unit to 2 decimal places, e.g.
125.25.)
CompositeRotomolded
Total cost assigned$ $
Cost assigned per unit$ $
eTextbook and Media
Activity-based costing requires a cost driver for each cost
pool. Use the following information to assign the costs to the
product lines using the activity-based costing approach.
Activity Cost PoolsCost DriversDriver Amount
for Composite
KayaksDriver Amount
for Rotomolded
Kayaks
Designing new modelsNumber of models31
Creating and testing prototypesNumber of prototypes62
Creating molds for kayaksNumber of molds111
Supervising production employeesNumber of employees1311
Curing timeNumber of days of curing time16,0002,000
What amount of overhead should be assigned to each composite kayak
using this method? What amount of overhead should be assigned to
each rotomolded kayak using this method? (Round cost assigned per
unit to 2 decimal places, e.g. 125.25.)
CompositeRotomolded
Total cost assigned$ $
Cost assigned per unit$ $
eTextbook and Media
1) | ||
Particular | Composite | Rotomolded |
Directly assigned | 30000 | 40000 |
Remaining amount allocated 50% | 428000 | 428000 |
to each product line | ||
Total cost assigned ($) | 458000 | 468000 |
Number of units | 1000 | 4000 |
Cost assigned per unit ($) | 458 | 117 |
Working :
Remaining = 428000 |
50% * ( 926000 - 30000 - 40000 ) |
2)
Total OH costs (a) | 856000 | |
Direct labor cost (b) | ||
Composite | 224000 | |
Rotomolded | 311000 | 535000 |
OH rate ( a / b ) | 1.6 |
Particular | Composite | Rotomolded |
Directly assigned | 30000 | 40000 |
Remaining amount allocated | 358400 | 497600 |
Based on direct labor costs | ||
Total cost assigned ($) | 388400 | 537600 |
Number of units | 1000 | 4000 |
Cost assigned per unit ($) | 388.4 | 134.4 |
Remaining | ||
Composite = 1.6* 224000 = 358400 | ||
Rotomolded = 1.6 * 311000 = 497600 |
3)
Estimated use of | Activity based | |||
Acitivty Cost Pools | Estimated O/H | cost drivers | O/H rates | |
Design | 116000 | 4 | 29000 | per model |
Prototypes | 152000 | 8 | 19000 | per prototype |
Molds | 180000 | 12 | 15000 | per mold |
Supervision | 192000 | 24 | 8000 | per employee |
Curing time | 216000 | 18000 | 12 | per day |
Composite | Rotomolded | |||||
Acitivty Cost Pools | Drivers | rate | Assigned | Drivers | rate | Assigned |
Design | 3 | 29000 | 87000 | 1 | 29000 | 29000 |
Prototypes | 6 | 19000 | 114000 | 2 | 19000 | 38000 |
Molds | 11 | 15000 | 165000 | 1 | 15000 | 15000 |
Supervision | 13 | 8000 | 104000 | 11 | 8000 | 88000 |
Curing time | 16000 | 12 | 192000 | 2000 | 12 | 24000 |
Total Amount Allocated | 662000 | 194000 | ||||
Directly Assigned | 30000 | 40000 | ||||
Total Cost Assigned (a) | 692000 | 234000 | ||||
Number of units (b) | 1000 | 4000 | ||||
Cost assigned per unit ( a / b) | 692 | 58.5 |