Question

In: Economics

Consider the case of Timmy, a consumer with preferences over oranges (O) and Sauerkraut (S) that...

Consider the case of Timmy, a consumer with preferences over oranges (O) and Sauerkraut (S) that give him a utility function U=ln(O) + S.

A. Given that Timmy has an allowance of I and faces prices of Po and Ps, use the Lagrangian Multiplier method to find his optimal consumption of O and S.

B. Demonstrate whether Sauerkraut is a normal or inferior good for Timmy.

C. Find Timmy’s indirect utility function. In a world where I=20, Po = 1 and Ps=2, how much O and S does Timmy buy, and how much utility does Timmy get?

D. Suppose Timmy’s godparents offer to transfer him to an alternate reality where the only difference is the reversal of prices (There Po = 2 and Ps=1). What would this do to Timmy’s consumption of O and S? Would Timmy wish to move to the alternate reality? Show why or why not?  

E. Using the schema – Find Timmy’s Hicksian demand for Oranges? What envelope theorem result did you use?

If Timmy had to pay to enter the alternate reality, what is the most he would pay?

Solutions

Expert Solution

  1. Highlights: • This work lays a foundation for studying constraints in quantum control simulations. • The underlying quantum control landscape in the presence of constraints is explored. • Constrained controls can encounter suboptimal traps in the landscape. • The controls are kinematic stand-ins for dynamic time-dependent controls. • A method is developed to transfer between constrained kinematic and dynamic controls. - Abstract: The control of quantum dynamics with tailored laser fields is finding growing experimental success. In practice, experiments will be subject to constraints on the controls that may prevent full optimization of the objective. A framework is presented for systematically investigating the impact of constraints in quantum optimal control simulations using a two-stage process starting with simple time-independent kinematic controls, which act as stand-ins for the traditional dynamic controls. The objective is a state-to-state transition probability, and constraints are introduced by restricting the kinematic control variables during optimization. As a second stage, the means to map from kinematic to dynamic controls is presented, thus enabling a simplified overall procedure for exploring how limited resources affect the ability to optimize the objective. A demonstration of the impact of imposing several types of kinematic constraints is investigated, thereby offering insight into constrained quantum controls

  2. On the formulation and numerical simulation of distributed-order fractional optimal control problems

    Science.gov (United States)

    Zaky, M. A.; Machado, J. A. Tenreiro

    2017-11-01

    In a fractional optimal control problem, the integer order derivative is replaced by a fractional order derivative. The fractional derivative embeds implicitly the time delays in an optimal control process. The order of the fractional derivative can be distributed over the unit interval, to capture delays of distinct sources. The purpose of this paper is twofold. Firstly, we derive the generalized necessary conditions for optimal control problems with dynamics described by ordinary distributed-order fractional differential equations (DFDEs). Secondly, we propose an efficient numerical scheme for solving an unconstrained convex distributed optimal control problem governed by the DFDE. We convert the problem under consideration into an optimal control problem governed by a system of DFDEs, using the pseudo-spectral method and the Jacobi-Gauss-Lobatto (J-G-L) integration formula. Next, we present the numerical solutions for a class of optimal control problems of systems governed by DFDEs. The convergence of the proposed method is graphically analyzed showing that the proposed scheme is a good tool for the simulation of distributed control problems governed by DFDE


Related Solutions

1 - John, a consumer with preferences over oranges (O) and Sauerkraut (S) that give him...
1 - John, a consumer with preferences over oranges (O) and Sauerkraut (S) that give him a utility function U=ln(O) + S. a. Given that John has an allowance of I and faces prices of Po and Ps, use the Lagrangian Multiplier method to find his optimal consumption of O and S. b. Demonstrate whether Sauerkraut is a normal or inferior good for John. c. Find John’s indirect utility function. In a world where I=20, Po = 1 and Ps=2,...
Problem 2: Consider a representative consumer whose preferences over consumption and leisure are given by the...
Problem 2: Consider a representative consumer whose preferences over consumption and leisure are given by the following utility function: U˜(C, l) = U(C) + V (l) (2) where U(.) and V (.) are twice differentiable functions (that is, their first and second derivatives exist). Suppose that this consumer faces lump-sum taxes, T, and receives dividend income, Π, from the 100% ownership of shares of the representative firm. A) Write down the consumer’s optimization problem and the first-order conditions determining optimal...
Consider a consumer with textbook preferences defined over two goods x1 and x2. Why is the...
Consider a consumer with textbook preferences defined over two goods x1 and x2. Why is the condition MRS = p1/p2 necessary for utility maximization? Is this condition alone sufficient?
Consider a consumer maximizing his preferences over a budget set (which is defined by a weak...
Consider a consumer maximizing his preferences over a budget set (which is defined by a weak inequality involving prices and income). Which of the following assumptions on preferences guarantees that a bundle lying in the interior of the budget set is not a maximizer? (A) Transitivity (B) Convexity (C) Continuity (D) Monotonicity (E) Homotheticity
Consider a consumer with textbook preferences defined over two goods X1 and Y2. Why is the...
Consider a consumer with textbook preferences defined over two goods X1 and Y2. Why is the condition MRS = p1/p2 necessary for utility maximization? Is this condition alone also sufficient?
Consider a consumer with preferences over two goods (good x and good y) given by u...
Consider a consumer with preferences over two goods (good x and good y) given by u ( x , y ) = x ⋅ y. Given income of I and price of good yas $ P yper pound and price of good xgiven as $ P xper pound, the consumer chooses the optimal consumption bundle given as x ∗ = I 2 P x and y ∗ = I 2 P y . Given P x = $ 1per pound...
Consider a one period economy in which the representative consumer has preferences over leisure (l) and...
Consider a one period economy in which the representative consumer has preferences over leisure (l) and consumption (c) described by the utility function u(c, l) = c0.5l0.5 This consumer has 1 unit of time h to spend between leisure, l, and labor supply, Ns. The representative firm’s production function is Y = zNd where Nd is labor demand and z = 2 is total factor productivity. The government buys one unit of consumption good, meaning that, G = 1. (a)...
Consumer Theory. A consumer has preferences over goods x and y that can be represented by...
Consumer Theory. A consumer has preferences over goods x and y that can be represented by the utility function ?(?,?) = ?+??(?) where ln is the (natural) log function. The consumer has income I (all to be spent on x and y) and the price of x and y are px and py respectively. (You may assume the “at least as good as x” set B(x) is a convex set, so the solution to the consumer’s problem will be a...
Lexicographic Preferences: Suppose that a consumer has lexicographic preferences over bundles of non-negative amounts of each...
Lexicographic Preferences: Suppose that a consumer has lexicographic preferences over bundles of non-negative amounts of each of two commodities. The consumer’s consumption set is R2+. The consumer weakly prefers bundle a = (a1,a2) over bundle b = (b1,b2) if either (i) a1 > b1, or (ii) both a1 = b1 and a2 ? b2. In any other circumstance, the consumer does not weakly prefer bundle a to bundle b. (Note that these preferences are not continuous. Furthermore, they cannot be...
Consider an individual with preferences defined over two goods, X1 and X2. This individual has preferences...
Consider an individual with preferences defined over two goods, X1 and X2. This individual has preferences that can be represented by the following utility function: u(X1, X2) = X1 + X 0.5 2 Let P1 = 4 and P2 = 2. In addition, suppose this individual has an income of $120. (a) Write down the expression for this consumer’s marginal rate of substitution of X1 for X2 (MRS12). Identify the distinguishing feature of this particular MRS12. (b) Calculate the optimal...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT