In: Accounting
The Bartonia Company manufactures grommets in Georgia and sell them directly to industrial customers in Georgia, Florida, and South Carolina. The company’s profit for last year was $20,000,000. The company has its manufacturing plant and headquarters in Georgia, warehouses in South Carolina and Florida, and sales forces in each state. Here are some of its financial statistics:
Payroll |
Property |
Sales |
|
GA |
5,000,000 |
35,000,000 |
6,000,000 |
SC |
1,000,000 |
5,000,000 |
13,000,000 |
FL |
500,000 |
400,000 |
1,000,000 |
TOTAL |
6,500,000 |
40,400,000 |
20,000,000 |
1. Suppose each state uses a simple three-factor apportionment formula. What share of company profit would each state tax?
2. Make that same calculation, but suppose each state double-weights the sales factor.
3. Make the calculation with each using only the sales factor.
4. Assume now that GA adopts the single sales factor and the other states use double-weighted sales.
5. Assume now that South Carolina adopts the single sales factor and the other states use double-weighted sales.
6. Explain why manufacturing firms in some states have pressed for use of the single sales factor. Why have nationwide business organizations not made this switch an issue?
Please answer all parts.
Part 1: |
|||||
States |
|||||
Georgia |
Florida |
South Carolina |
|||
Simple three factor apportionment ratio |
6500000 |
40400000 |
20000000 |
66900000 |
|
Total profit |
20000000 |
||||
Share of company profit taxable |
1943198.8 |
12077728 |
5979073.244 |
20000000 |
|
Thus, share of profit the states would tax is as following: |
|||||
State |
Amount ($) |
||||
Georgia |
1943199 |
||||
Florida |
12077728 |
||||
South Carolina |
5979073 |
||||
Part 2 |
|||||
States |
|||||
Georgia |
Florida |
South Carolina |
|||
Payroll |
5000000 |
500000 |
1000000 |
||
Property |
35000000 |
400000 |
5000000 |
5400000 |
|
Sales |
12000000 |
26000000 |
2000000 |
||
52000000 |
26900000 |
8000000 |
86900000 |
||
Georgia |
Florida |
South Carolina |
|||
Basis of apportionment |
52000000 |
26900000 |
8000000 |
||
Total profit |
20000000 |
||||
Share of company profit taxable |
11967779 |
6191024.2 |
1841197 |
||
#DIV/0! |
#DIV/0! |
||||
part 3: |
|||||
States |
|||||
Georgia |
Florida |
South Carolina |
|||
Sales |
6000000 |
13000000 |
1000000 |
20000000 |
|
Total profit |
20000000 |
||||
Share of company profit taxable |
6000000 |
13000000 |
1000000 |
||
Part 4: |
|||||
States |
|||||
Georgia |
Florida |
South Carolina |
|||
Sales |
6000000 |
26000000 |
2000000 |
34000000 |
|
Total profit |
20000000 |
||||
Share of company profit taxable |
3529412 |
15294118 |
1176471 |
||
Part 5: |
|||||
States |
|||||
Georgia |
Florida |
South Carolina |
|||
Sales |
12000000 |
26000000 |
1000000 |
39000000 |
|
Total profit |
20000000 |
||||
Share of company profit taxable |
6153846 |
13333333 |
512820.5 |
Answer to part 6:
The use of single sales factor is the most appropriate method to determine the tax liability as it represent the amount of revenue earned in different states which is the primary contributing factor in determining the amount of profit on which tax is to be imposed.
The nation-wide business organization has not made this an issue as it is the most appropriate method to determine the fair tax liability in different states in the country.