Question

In: Economics

Suppose China wishes to reduce the amount of air pollution generated by electrical plants. The marginal...

Suppose China wishes to reduce the amount of air pollution generated by electrical plants. The marginal benefit of electricity is P = 464, 000 − 200Q and the producers’ marginal cost is P = 32, 000 + 70Q. The air pollution presents a negative externality and the marginal external cost of each unit is P = 75.6Q.

1. In the market equilibrium, what is the total cost of the pollution externality?

2. In the socially optimal outcome, what is the total cost of the pollution externality?

3. Is producer surplus higher at the market equilibrium or at the socially optimal outcome?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Rahul Sunny answered 1 year ago
Next > < Previous

Related Solutions

If society wishes to reduce pollution, why is it more efficient to tax the pollution rather...
If society wishes to reduce pollution, why is it more efficient to tax the pollution rather than set a limit on pollution?
If society wishes to reduce pollution, why is it more efficient to tax the pollution rather...
If society wishes to reduce pollution, why is it more efficient to tax the pollution rather than set a limit on pollution? If the government issues tradeable pollution permits (ie., a cap-and-trade policy), does it matter for economic efficiency (social welfare) whether all firms receive the same amount of permits, or whether some firms receive more permits than others?
14.Suppose that the marginal damages to society from air pollution are MD = 6+ 2e, where...
14.Suppose that the marginal damages to society from air pollution are MD = 6+ 2e, where e is the level of air pollution. Suppose also that the marginal cost of reducing the air pollution on the part of firms is MC = 150 - e. a. Find the optimal level of pollution. Illustrate graphically. b. Find the net gain to society, assuming firms were initially not controlling emissions at all. c. What level of tax would achieve the optimal level...
Aiming at reducing air pollution, the government decided to reduce the country’s use of gasoline by...
Aiming at reducing air pollution, the government decided to reduce the country’s use of gasoline by imposing an $1 tax on each gallon of gasoline sold. Are consumers of gasoline helped or hurt by the tax? (Hint- draw the diagram to see if consumer surplus increases or decreases) A. Consumer surplus is unchanged B. Consumers are helped C. Consumers are hurt D. Not enough information to conclude Aiming at reducing air pollution, the government decided to reduce the country’s use...
Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A's marginal...
Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A's marginal costs associated with pollution reduction is MC = 20 + 4Q. Firm B's marginal costs associated with pollution reduction is MC = 10 + 8Q. The marginal benefit of pollution reduction is MB = 400 –40. a. What is the socially optimal level of each firm's pollution reduction? b. Compare the social efficiency of three possible outcomes: (1) require all firms to reduce pollu-...
Your friend believes that the government should not try to reduce the pollution amount in companies....
Your friend believes that the government should not try to reduce the pollution amount in companies. He believes every single environmental regulation is bad. Write a response (5-8 sentences) about why it is socially efficient for there to be efforts to reduce pollution. (Make sure to use some economic terms in your response).
Suppose pollution comes from two firms: H and L. The aggregate marginal benefit from pollution to...
Suppose pollution comes from two firms: H and L. The aggregate marginal benefit from pollution to firms is described by         MB=16-(2/3) y, where y is total pollution. The two firms’ marginal benefit from pollution is described by the following functions: MBH = 24-2y H MBL = 12-y L where y H and y L represent the level of pollution for firm H and firm L; that is, y= y H +y L .       The government study has concluded that...
Suppose pollution comes from two firms: H and L. The aggregate marginal benefit from pollution to...
Suppose pollution comes from two firms: H and L. The aggregate marginal benefit from pollution to firms is described by         MB=16-(2/3) y, where y is total pollution. The two firms’ marginal benefit from pollution is described by the following functions: MBH = 24-2y H MBL = 12-y L where y H and y L represent the level of pollution for firm H and firm L; that is, y= y H +y L .      The government study has concluded that...
Some companies and municipalities are switching to a four-day workweek to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution,...
Some companies and municipalities are switching to a four-day workweek to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution, and stressed employees. Compressing the workweek into four 10-hour days sounds pretty good to you. You would much prefer having Friday free to schedule medical appointments and take care of family business, in addition to leisurely three-day weekends. As a manager at Skin Essentials, a mineral-based skin care products and natural cosmetics company, you are convinced that the company’s 200 employees could switch to...
1. Two firms can reduce pollution at the following marginal abatement costs: MC1 = 12Q1 MC2...
1. Two firms can reduce pollution at the following marginal abatement costs: MC1 = 12Q1 MC2 = 4Q2 where Qi is the abatement (pollution control) of firm i = 1, 2. In the absence of regulation, each firm would emit 40 units of emissions. Assume that each firm’s objective is to minimize its compliance costs (c) The aggregate marginal cost function for this two-firm industry is: MC = 3Q Suppose the marginal benefit of pollution control is given by: MB...
ADVERTISEMENT
Subjects
ADVERTISEMENT
Latest Questions
ADVERTISEMENT