Your friend believes that the government should not try to reduce the pollution amount in companies....

Your friend believes that the government should not try to reduce the pollution amount in companies. He believes every single environmental regulation is bad. Write a response (5-8 sentences) about why it is socially efficient for there to be efforts to reduce pollution. (Make sure to use some economic terms in your response).

Expert Solution

Environmental regulations are the laws enforced in a society for the purpose of protecting the environment from harmful human activities. These activities include different types of pollutions. The pollutants are those products or byproducts which were not meant to be used in wider scale and that have been used excessively. Examples are plastics, poisonous gases from industries and vehicles, etc.
Nowadays urbanisation have been increased to a higher level which resulted in half the population being residing in urban areas. The Economic regulations made for protecting the environment limits the working of pollution causing companies. At the same time, these regulations encourage new innovations which are sustainable in nature.
Studies have been found that environmental regulations are not effecting the GDP per capita growth of a country. Well monitored environmental policies are always a great need to the society. In short, sustainable development must be achieved, then only humans and nature can coexist.

Rahul Sunny answered 2 years ago

Some theorists contend that companies that create pollution should report the social cost of that pollution...

Some theorists contend that companies that create pollution should report the social cost of that pollution in income statements. They argue that such companies are indirectly subsidized as the cost of pollution is borne by society while only production costs (and perhaps minimal pollution fines) are shown in the income statement. Thus, the product sells for less than would be necessary if all costs were included. Assume that the FASB is considering a standard to include the social costs of...

1. In your view, should the US aim to reduce government debt at the expense of...

1. In your view, should the US aim to reduce government debt at the expense of social programs like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. What is the argument for reducing deficit spending and what is the argument for maintaining (or expanding) social programs? What are the limits on government debt, both in general and in the US specifically? Explain.

Should the government try to limit population growth and if so, how? share your thought

Aiming at reducing air pollution, the government decided to reduce the country’s use of gasoline by...

Aiming at reducing air pollution, the government decided to reduce the country’s use of gasoline by imposing an $1 tax on each gallon of gasoline sold. Are consumers of gasoline helped or hurt by the tax? (Hint- draw the diagram to see if consumer surplus increases or decreases) A. Consumer surplus is unchanged B. Consumers are helped C. Consumers are hurt D. Not enough information to conclude Aiming at reducing air pollution, the government decided to reduce the country’s use...

Try to outline a general principle covering when government should, and when government should not interfere...

Try to outline a general principle covering when government should, and when government should not interfere with the freedom of the individual. This principle should cover not only restrictions on the sale of codeine but other similar interventions –eg taxing cigarettes, alcohol, sugar

Suppose China wishes to reduce the amount of air pollution generated by electrical plants. The marginal...

Suppose China wishes to reduce the amount of air pollution generated by electrical plants. The marginal benefit of electricity is P = 464, 000 − 200Q and the producers’ marginal cost is P = 32, 000 + 70Q. The air pollution presents a negative externality and the marginal external cost of each unit is P = 75.6Q. 1. In the market equilibrium, what is the total cost of the pollution externality? 2. In the socially optimal outcome, what is the...

4. The congress and the governor decide that they should reduce environmental pollution reducing the use...

4. The congress and the governor decide that they should reduce environmental pollution reducing the use of gasoline. They impose a tax of $ 0.10 on each liter of gasoline sold. a. Should they impose the tax on producers or consumers? Explain carefully using supply and demand diagrams. (4 points) b. If the demand were more elastic, would the tax be more or less effective? your purpose of reducing gasoline consumption? Explain using both text and diagram. (4 points) c....

Economics Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels Firm A’s...

Economics Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels Firm A’s marginal costs associated with pollution reduction is MC=20+4Q and firm B’s MC=10+8Q The marginal benefit of pollution reduction is MB=400-4Q Compare the social efficiency of three possible outcomes: require all firms to reduce pollution by the same amount; charge a common tax per unit of pollution; or require all firms to reduce pollution by the same amount, but allow pollution permits to be bought...

Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A's marginal...

Two firms are ordered by the federal government to reduce their pollution levels. Firm A's marginal costs associated with pollution reduction is MC = 20 + 4Q. Firm B's marginal costs associated with pollution reduction is MC = 10 + 8Q. The marginal benefit of pollution reduction is MB = 400 –40. a. What is the socially optimal level of each firm's pollution reduction? b. Compare the social efficiency of three possible outcomes: (1) require all firms to reduce pollu-...

D1. List and explain three methods that managed care companies try to reduce their costs. For...

D1. List and explain three methods that managed care companies try to reduce their costs. For each method, do you think that this reduces moral hazard (that is, excessive usage), or that it reduces quality, or both? D2. Why do you suppose that people do not enter into their own pooling arrangements, given that the insurance company can charge hefty loading costs?

Question