In: Nursing
Imagine that you are a public health nurse, and you and your colleagues have determined that the threat of a deadly new strain of influenza indicates a need for a mass inoculation program in your community. What public health data would have been used to determine the need for such a program? Where would you locate public health data? What data will be collected to determine the success of such a program? How might you communicate this to other communities or internationally?
1. Digital technologies are being harnessed to support the
public-health response to COVID-19 worldwide, including population
surveillance, case identification, contact tracing and evaluation
of interventions on the basis of mobility data and communication
with the public. These rapid responses leverage billions of mobile
phones, large online datasets, connected devices, relatively
low-cost computing resources and advances in machine learning and
natural language processing. This Review aims to capture the
breadth of digital innovations for the public-health response to
COVID-19 worldwide and their limitations, and barriers to their
implementation, including legal, ethical and privacy barriers, as
well as organizational and workforce barriers. The future of public
health is likely to become increasingly digital, and we review the
need for the alignment of international strategies for the
regulation, evaluation and use of digital technologies to
strengthen pandemic management, and future preparedness for
COVID-19 and other infectious diseases.
2. National-level surveillance data are compiled from case
notification reports of national notifiable diseases and conditions
submitted from the state, territory, and selected local health
departments to CDC.Data can be used to evaluate program impact, to
determine appropriate public health interventions, to monitor
progress, to determine populations to target for an intervention,
to determine barriers to care, and to influence public
policy.
3. EGH’s goal is to help inform current and future policies and
programs in global health based on what has worked in the past. We
do this by rigorously analyzing the success of countries that have
made extraordinary progress. In the midst of a constantly evolving
pandemic like COVID-19, it is not a simple matter to identify
countries that have been most effective and therefore have the most
to teach the rest of the world about best practices. Based on the
current data, we developed a methodology to help us identify these
emerging success countries. There are considerable limitations to
the selection methodology due to the evolving nature of the
pandemic including incomplete data, evolving case definitions, and
the fact that the ultimate outcomes are unknown. As you will see,
it is not possible to identify emerging success stories, or
exemplars, using just one indicator. Each data point has nuanced
drivers and meanings, making it important to triangulate and look
across multiple indicators to identify countries that have had
success to date in managing the pandemic. The daily rates of
confirmed deaths follow very different trajectories in countries.
The steeper the slope of the curve, the faster the rate of increase
in deaths. Countries at the top of the first graph below have had
the most deaths, but some of those countries also have larger
populations. The second graph below shows deaths per capita to
account for differences in population. These graphs suggest that
some responses have been much more effective at reducing deaths
from COVID-19 than others, but they do not tell us why they are
more effective.
Detect, Contain, Treat :-
To help shed light on why some responses are more effective, we
initially started with a four-part framework for epidemic
preparedness and response: prevention, detection, containment, and
treatment. Because transmission of COVID-19 is ongoing, it is too
soon to determine if any country will ultimately succeed at
prevention, so we excluded the prevention phase from our analysis.
We selected multiple indicators for the detection, containment, and
treatment phases that could help us identify which countries are
excelling at any given phase. This enables us to identify countries
that show emerging success at each phase, which makes it more
likely to glean detailed insights that will be useful for other
countries.On this page, we walk through a total of nine graphs
addressing all three phases, describing what each graph can and
cannot tell us about a country’s response. These graphs are updated
daily, so the countries that stand out now might change over time.
Some countries with early positive outcomes were unable to sustain
their success, whereas the situations in other countries gradually
improved. To see the results on any given day of the pandemic or to
reflect any range of dates, adjust the slider bar below the graphs.
This will turn single data points into line graphs.
Country Selection Criteria
To ensure that our process is rigorous and that other countries can
use lessons from our exemplars, we applied the following three
criteria to select countries for our analysis:
We included only countries with populations greater than 5
million. This minimizes the likelihood that apparent trends are
background noise in the data, and to ensure we can extract lessons
applicable to the many large countries that are currently
struggling to contain the pandemic.
We included only countries in which at least 21 days had passed
since the 100th confirmed case.
We wanted to include only countries whose response had been going
on long enough and with sufficient numbers of cases to be properly
assessed, recognizing that in some countries, low prevalence may be
the result of effective containment.
We included only countries with high-quality data on testing,
cases, and deaths.
Many countries have been slow to publish testing data, preventing
proper analysis at this time. Our testing database has been
developed with a clearly documented checklist of criteria for
inclusion; definitions and units; and detailed descriptions for
each country so users can understand the comparability of data from
different countries.
The number of countries meeting the second and third criteria will
grow over time, increasing the number of countries that can be
included in the analysis.