Question

In: Economics

In the sequential bargaining game with ∞ <T rounds where player 1 is the first proposer...

In the sequential bargaining game with ∞ <T rounds where player 1 is the first proposer and if the player 2 rejects the offer, the game goes to the second round where they switch roles (the payoff is (s, 1-s) if responder accepts the offer) how do I find the followings?

1. A Nash Equilibrium that is not a SPE.

2. Nash Equilibrium which is different from the first question and which offers the highest possible payoff to the second player amongst all NEs?

Solutions

Expert Solution

Sequential bargaining A classic economic is how people will begin over a pie of a certain size. One approach, associated with Nash (1950),is to specify a set of axiom that a reasonable or fair division should satisfy, and identify the division with these properties. Ultimate game a simple represented of alternating offers bargaining,with costly delay (Rubinstein bargaining .pie size M To divide two players. Economists were skeptical of Gas results insufficient experience.payoff too low. Stackelberg supply and the first mover advantage formal definition bargaining and discounted payoffs. U r not competition reminder. the players:2 firms,e.g.coke and Pepsi. Strategies quantities players produce of identical products: qi, q-i.products are perfect substitutes.The payoffs constant marginal cost of production c.stackelberg model assume now that one firm gets to move first and the other moves after. That is one firm gets to set the quantity first.Is it an advantage to move first? Or it is better to wait and see what the other firm doing and then react? .The NIM game we have two players there are two piles of stones, A and b each player, in turn, decodes to delete some stones from whatever pile. The player that remains with the last stone wins. Perfect information and pure strategy a game of perfect information is one in which at each node of the game tree, the player whose turn is to move knows which node she is at and how she got there. Nash equilibrium is a game theory. The concept that determines the optimal solution in a non cooperative game in which each player lacks any incentive to change his her initial strategy.Under the Nash equilibrium, a player does not gain anything from deviating from their initially chosen strategy. Nash equilibrium is one of the fundamental concepts in game theory. It conceptualized the behavior and interaction between game participate to determine the best outcomes. It's also predicting the decision of the player if they are making decisions at the same time and the decision of one player takes into account the decision of other players. Nash equilibrium was discovered by American mathematician John Nash. He was awarded the Nobel Prize in economics in 1994 for his contribution to the development of game theory.

There are may types of game theory cooperative and non cooperative game theory are the most common.cooperative game theory deals with how coalition or cooperative groups interact when only the payoff are known. It is a game between coalition of players rather than between individuals.prisoners dilemma is the most well known example of two criminals arrested for acting


Related Solutions

A sequential game with two-players 1 and 2, where player 1 has the first move advantage....
A sequential game with two-players 1 and 2, where player 1 has the first move advantage. Each player has two strategies, A and B. If both players choose A, each gets a payoff of 2. Both choose B, each gets a payoff of 3. For player 1 choose A and player 2 choose B, player 1 gets 4, and player 2 gets 1. If player 1 chooses B and player 2 choose A, player 1 gets a payoff of 1,...
In bargaining scenarios without player impatience, explain how the number of bargaining rounds and who makes...
In bargaining scenarios without player impatience, explain how the number of bargaining rounds and who makes the first offer affect the final outcome. How is bargaining impatience measured?
This question is about the sequential moves Stag Hunt game. There are two players. Player 1...
This question is about the sequential moves Stag Hunt game. There are two players. Player 1 moves first, player 2 observes player 1’s move, and then player 2 moves. Players get 10 jollies each if they both choose Stag; 5 jollies if they choose Hare; and 0 jollies if they choose Stag but the other player does not. What is the set of (pure) strategies for player 1? What is the set of (pure) strategies for player 2? Explain why...
explain how the number of bargaining rounds and who makes the first offer affect the final...
explain how the number of bargaining rounds and who makes the first offer affect the final outcome.
Consider the following game. Player 1’s payoffs are listed first:                        Player 2 X Y Player...
Consider the following game. Player 1’s payoffs are listed first:                        Player 2 X Y Player 1 A 90 , 1 10 , 0 B 10 , 0 50 , 1 C 100 , 0 80 , 1 Imagine that player 1 makes a decision first and Player 2 makes a decision after observing player 1’s choice. What is the subgame-perfect equilibrium of this game? Imagine that player 2 makes a decision first and Player 1 makes a decision after...
Bargaining can be viewed strategically, as a game of chicken where the ability to commit to...
Bargaining can be viewed strategically, as a game of chicken where the ability to commit to a position allows a player to capture the lion’s share of the gains from trade. Do you agree with this concept? What have you observed about bargaining situations? PLEASE DONT TAKE OTHER PEOPLE'S ANSWERS!
A carnival game offers a $100 cash prize for a game where the player tries to...
A carnival game offers a $100 cash prize for a game where the player tries to toss a ring onto one of many pegs. Alex will play the ring toss game five times, with an 8% chance of making any given throw. What is the probability that Alex tosses one of the five rings onto a peg? What is the probability that Alex tosses more than one of the five rings onto a peg? If Alex tossed five rings again...
This is done in C++. This is a game where one player thinks of a number...
This is done in C++. This is a game where one player thinks of a number between 1 and a 1000 and the other player has to guess in 10 tries or less. Allow two variations: the computer to pick the number and the player guesses or the player to pick the number and the computer to guesses. 1 – Player one picks a number 2 – Player two guesses the number. 3 – Player one either confirms that the...
) Consider a game where player 1’s possible three strategies are a, b and c and...
) Consider a game where player 1’s possible three strategies are a, b and c and player 2’s possible strategies are A, B and C. The players choose their strategies simultaneously. The payoff matrix of the game is as follows:                                           Player 2 A B C    a 8,5 9,7 10,8 player 1 b 6,1 10,3 7,9 c 5,4 8,6 6,4 (5 pts) Is there a dominated strategy for player 1? For player 2? Justify your answer. (5 pts) Is...
Consider the following strategic-form simultaneous game. Player 1’s payoffs are listed first, in bold Player 2...
Consider the following strategic-form simultaneous game. Player 1’s payoffs are listed first, in bold Player 2 W X Y Z Player 1 A 2 , 500 30 , 400 200 , 200 4 , 4 B 5 , 50 20 , 40   10 , 20 4 , 4 C 1 ,   0 1 ,   4 3 ,   2 4 , 4 Does either player have any weakly dominant strategies? If yes, list them. Briefly explain. Does either player have any...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT