In: Statistics and Probability
A survey of US women with Ph.D.'s was conducted. Of the 102 respondents in marriages or long-term partnerships with men, 57% reported that their spouse/partner also held a doctorate degree.
Construct a theoretical 90% confidence interval. The interval is:
Select one:
a. (49.0%, 64.7%)
b. (48.9%, 65.1%)
c. (47.1%, 66.7%)
d. (47.4%, 66.6%)
e. (44.4%, 69.6%)
Based on the interval in the previous question, what group(s) can we make a conclusion about?
Select one:
a. All US women
b. All US women with Ph.D.'s
c. All US women with Ph.D.'s who are married
d. All US women with Ph.D.'s who are married or in long-term partnerships
e. All of the above
f. None of the above
The sociologists reporting on this study stated that: "There is strong evidence (p<0.001) that women in opposite-sex partnerships are more likely than women in same-sex partnerships to have a partner with the equivalent level of education." What type of error might the sociologists have committed?
Select one:
a. Type I
b. Type II
c. Neither error is possible
d. Both errors are possible
We need to construct the 90% confidence interval for the population proportion. We have been provided with the following information about the sample proportion:
Sample Proportion | 0.57 |
N | 102 |
The critical value for α=0.1 is z_c = 1.645. The corresponding confidence interval is computed as shown below:
.
b. (48.9%, 65.1%)
Based on the interval in the previous question, what group(s) can we make a conclusion about?
d. All US women with Ph.D.'s who are married or in long-term partnerships
The sociologists reporting on this study stated that: "There is strong evidence (p<0.001) that women in opposite-sex partnerships are more likely than women in same-sex partnerships to have a partner with the equivalent level of education." What type of error might the sociologists have committed?
Since p value is small the null hypothesis is rejected]
Hence she might have made type I error
.
a. Type I