In: Accounting
10) ABC: Comparison to traditional costing
Palms Surf manufactures surfboards. The company produces two
models: the starter board and the pro board. Data regarding the two
boards are as follows:
Product |
Direct Labour hours per unit |
Annual Production |
Total direct labour hours |
Pro |
2.5 |
10000 boards |
25000 |
Starter |
1.5 |
30000 boards |
45000 |
The pro board requires $85 in direct materials per unit, whereas the started board requires $50. The company pays an average direct labour rate $14 per hour. The company has historically used direct labour hours as the activity base for applying overhead to the boards. Manufacturing overhead is estimated to be $1,664,000 per year. The pro board is more complex to manufacture than the starter board because it requires more machine time.
Gabriel, the company’s controller, is considering the use of activity-based costing to apply overhead because the surfboards require such different amounts of machining Gabriel has identified the following four separate activity centres.
Volume of annual activity |
||||
Activity Centre |
Cost Driver |
Traceable costs |
Pro Board |
Starter board |
Machine set up |
Number of set-ups |
$100, 000 |
100 |
100 |
Special design |
Design hours |
$364,000 |
900 |
100 |
Production |
Direct labour hours |
$900,000 |
10000 |
30000 |
Machining |
Machine hours |
$300,000 |
9000 |
1000 |
a) Calculate the overhead rate based on traditional overhead
allocation with direct labour hours as the base.
b) Determine the total cost to produce one unit of each product (use the overhead rate calculated in question a.)
c) Calculate the overhead rate for each activity centre based on activity- based costing techniques
d) Determine the total cost to produce one unit of each product.
Use the overhead rates calculated in question c)
e) Explain why overhead cost shifted from the high- volume product
to the low- volume product under the activity-based costing.
Part A
Overhead rate = total estimated manufacturing overhead / total direct labor hours = 1664000/(25000+45000) = 23.77 per direct labor hour
part B
Pro |
Starter |
|
Direct materials |
85 |
50 |
Direct labor (2.5*14); (1.5*14) |
35 |
21 |
Overhead (2.5*23.77); (1.5*23.77) |
59.43 |
35.66 |
Unit product cost |
$179.43 |
$106.66 |
Part C
Activity Centre |
Traceable costs |
Cost Driver |
Activity rate |
Cost allocation to Pro |
Cost allocation to Starter |
Machine set up |
100000 |
200 setups |
5000 per set up |
50000 |
50000 |
Special design |
364000 |
1000 design hours |
364 per design hour |
327600 |
36400 |
Production |
900000 |
40000 labor hours |
22.5 per direct labor hour |
225000 |
675000 |
machining |
300000 |
10000 machine hours |
30 per machine hour |
270000 |
30000 |
Total overhead costs |
872600 |
791400 |
|||
Units produced |
10000 |
30000 |
|||
Overhead cost per unit |
$87.26 |
$26.38 |
Part D
Pro |
Starter |
|
Direct materials |
85 |
50 |
Direct labor (2.5*14); (1.5*14) |
35 |
21 |
Overhead |
87.26 |
26.38 |
Unit product cost |
$207.26 |
$97.38 |
Part E
In activity-based costing method, the manufacturing overhead costs often shift from high-volume to low-volume products because in this method, unlike traditional costing system, the overhead costs are allocated to products according activity usage. In traditional costing method, batch-level and product-level costs are allocated on the basis of one single volume-related allocation bases. Due to this low-volume products being under-cost and high-volume products being over-cost.