In: Economics
In your own words, describe the "traditional" and "labor union as a collective voice" views of how labor unions impact labor productivity. Be sure to describe the justification that each viewpoint uses to support their argument.
(In your own words plagarism check)
Labor unions are the collective workforce's traditional voice, born from an era in which employees had little rights and little power. They are based on employees ' concerns, designed to argue for their salaries and benefits. In your workplace, supporting and working with unions will give employees the sense of agency and being understood they are looking for. But without their challenges, unions are not. These are motivated by confrontation, centered on an oppositional relationship with management, and adhere to rigid hierarchies that alienate certain employees. We still have a future, but they may not be the best organizations with which to participate.
Throughout recent decades, most companies have tried to engage with their workers individually by setting up committees and focus groups to seek out the opinions of employees. There may be a Social Responsibility Committee to guide the charity work of the business, a social committee to arrange outings and celebrations, and perhaps even a committee to engage with employee representatives on imminent business changes.
This means of a collective voice is ideal for business leaders. They set up the systems, thus retaining control of what is being addressed. However, while these committees can help empower employees and address a wider range of issues than traditional unions, they can become artificial and toothless. If the employer sets the agenda and the location for discussion, employees may not feel they can voice their real concerns. When you explore ways to boost understanding of disability in the workplace, collaborate with groups that are already part of some of your employees. If you have a lot of sports fans then engage in social activities with groups serving local supporters. You will never be able to engage every employee in every act of dialogue, but then unions and committees have never been able to. You're going to engage with something they care about at least this way.