Historically, investors holding corporate equities have earned a premium, or extra return for holding equities instead...

Historically, investors holding corporate equities have earned a premium, or extra return for holding equities instead of bonds. Economists have assumed that the equity premium, which has averaged about 7 percent during the post-Depression period, is a measure of the compensation that investors require for taking on the extra risk inherent in equity investments (stocks). Recently, there has been a significant decline in the equity premium on stocks. Between 1990 and 2000, the value of U.S. corporate equities rose 425 percent, and, as a consequence, the return on a diversified stock portfolio has been much lower than its historic average and close to the return on U.S. government bonds. One possible explanation of a shrinking equity premium is the greater opportunity for portfolio diversification – the "mutual fund effect."

How could the growth of mutual fund investing result in a smaller equity premium in the future? Carefully explain.

Expert Solution

Growth of mutual fund investing is focused at continuously diversification of their portfolio and providing investors with low risk investments which are highly diversified across various sectors so even if there is a downside in the stock market, These Mutual Funds are not losing much because they have diversifed across various asset classes or they have also diversifed across various sectors which are defensive and aggressive so they have tried to eliminate non systematic risk to a large extent.

Mutual fund investing is believing in the philosophy of high diversification which will be eliminating the firm specific risk in the portfolio to a large extent and it will mean that there will be a lower level of risk which will be present in the overall portfolio and those can mostly be attributed to the systematic factors so these low risk factors are one of the important aspects of investment in these Mutual Funds at any stage because investor feels that they are providing a higher rate of return in the longer time frame so there will be a very low risk premium which will be taken by these Mutual Funds because they have already believed that they are diversifying the risk to a large extent and they are not taking high amount of risk in order to make a higher amount of Return so there is a presence of very low risk and there is also a subsequent project of low risk premium hence it can be said that emergence of the mutual funds has led to a very high amount of diversification and elimination of systematic risk to a large extent and that had formulated into higher rate of return in the portfolio in the longer run and low risk premium because investors feel that there are very low risk in accordance with investment with mutual funds.

jeff jeffy answered 1 year ago

Will investors pay extra for the shares of a company with good corporate governance? give a...

Will investors pay extra for the shares of a company with good corporate governance? give a study cases

Not all investors are interested in accepting extra risk in order to receive a higher return....

Not all investors are interested in accepting extra risk in order to receive a higher return. Investors can be classified as risk adverse, risk neutral, or risk seeking. To determine the risk associated with an investment, calculations are made to determine the risk-free rate and the risk premium associated with the investment. Security 1 Security 2 Security 3 Risk-free Rate of Interest 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% Various Risk Rates Interest Rate Risk 1.20% 1.50% 1.55% Credit Risk...

Historically, women workers have earned approximately ________ percent of what men workers earned. By 2003, female...

Historically, women workers have earned approximately ________ percent of what men workers earned. By 2003, female workers were earning _______ percent of what male workers earned. 50,70 60,80 50,80 60,85 Which one of the following is not considered as part of a compensation program? Benefits and services Short- and long-term incentives Job-related training Wage and salary add-ons Which one of the following characteristics is least likely to describe a capital-intensive business? low-skilled work force uses sophisticated technology requires fewer employees...

Why would two investors with different holding periods but the same expectations and required return for...

Why would two investors with different holding periods but the same expectations and required return for a company, arrive at the same intrinsic value of a common share of a company?

a higher default risk premium indicates investors expect a credit risk on the corporate bonds a.lower...

a higher default risk premium indicates investors expect a credit risk on the corporate bonds a.lower b.higher c.neutral d.not able to determine

What is the nominal return on short-term corporate paper if the liquidity premium is 0.5%, the...

What is the nominal return on short-term corporate paper if the liquidity premium is 0.5%, the default risk premium is 0.7%, and the inflation rate is 1.4%? Assume 0% real return. Assume both A and B Factory sell short-term corporate paper to investors. If A Factory's yield to investors is 3% and B's is 4.3%, and both companies sell 3-month paper, what factor explains this difference?

You have a market portfolio and the risk premium for holding it is 5% per year....

You have a market portfolio and the risk premium for holding it is 5% per year. rf = 5%. There are two new stock issues: A or B. A stock has a standard deviation of 40%, a beta of 0.5, and an expected return of 8.0%. B stock has a standard deviation of 30%, a beta of 1.0, and an expected return of 9.0%. If you can add at most one stock to your portfolio, which one do you choose?

Why does times-interest-earned use operating income, but the return on equity uses net income instead of...

Why does times-interest-earned use operating income, but the return on equity uses net income instead of operating income?

Corporate ownership varies around the world. Historically individuals have owned the majority of shares in public...

Corporate ownership varies around the world. Historically individuals have owned the majority of shares in public corporations in the United States. In Germany and Japan, however, banks, other large ﬁnancial institutions, and other companies own most of the stock in public corporations. Do you think agency problems are likely to be more or less severe in Germany and Japan than in the United States? Why? In recent years, large ﬁnancial institutions such as mutual funds and pension funds have been...

Corporate ownership varies around the world. Historically, individuals have owned the majority of shares in public...

Corporate ownership varies around the world. Historically, individuals have owned the majority of shares in public corporations in the United States. In Canada this is also the case, but ownership is more often concentrated in the hands of a majority shareholder. In Germany and Japan, banks, other ﬁnancial institutions, and large companies own most of the shares in public corporations. How do you think these ownership diﬀerences aﬀect the severity of agency problems in diﬀerent countries?

Question