Question

In: Nursing

Case Narrative Case details given to participants (can be given freely or must be asked for...

Case Narrative

Case details given to participants (can be given freely or must be asked for by participants)

Patient Description& Chief complaint:

A 68-year-old woman is admitted with fever, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. She informs you that she is a “borderline diabetic” and “only has to watch what she eats.” She tells you that she has not eaten for 3 days and has had difficulty “keeping liquids down.” While doing the nursing history, she describes her urine as dark and foul smelling. Upon further questions, she states she does have some burning upon urination. She describes her abdominal pain as constant, generalized, and rates it as a 5 or 6 on a scale of 0 to 10.

Weight: 75

Height: 183

History of Current Illness: 3 days

Pertinent Past Medical History: Diabetes Mellitus

Past surgical History: Free

Family/Social History: Free

Medication History Profile and Allergies: Nothing known about

Lifestyle: (occupation, diet, income, educational level, marital statues): Nothing known about

Critical thinking questions: -

Pre starting any scenario the student will prepare to answer the following questions: -

  1. Doctor orders IV fluids and an antibiotic with first dose to be given STAT. You have not obtained urine specimen yet. Which has priority (e.g., starting IV, administrating antibiotic, or obtaining urine specimen) and why?

  1. Three days later, client has following laboratory results: Hct = 39.2 and WBC = 10.8 × 103/mL3. What do those results indicate to you?

  1. Abdominal x-ray shows a possible mass. An MRI of abdomen is ordered. Client is quite anxious because she has heard from her friend that procedure is difficult for people who are claustrophobic. How will you respond?

Solutions

Expert Solution

In first question, we have to collect urine sample in first place, then have to give antibiotics and then start iv fluids. Because if we collect urine sample after administration of antibiotics, it would possibly have started its action and might have decreased bacterial load which will give us falee result on urine examination.

In 2nd question, hematocrit of 39.2 and WBC count showing leukocytosis will mostly points toward acute bacterial infection. Further confirmation should be done by performing urine bacterial culture and urine examination. Since patient is 68 yr old female, diabetic complaining of burning micturition, this is case of urinary tract infection. Females are more prone to UTI because they have short urethra as compared to males.

Now patient uas to undergo MRI which is performed in closed room (Faraday's cage). We have to counsel patient about the procedure, about its need in her diagnosis, time required for procedure, and all other aspects. As there is no history mentioning patient is claustrophobic, we can we perform it. Claustrophobia is relative contraindication of MRI.


Related Solutions

Case Narrative Case details given to participants (can be given freely or must be asked for...
Case Narrative Case details given to participants (can be given freely or must be asked for by participants) Patient Description& Chief complaint: A 68-year-old woman is admitted with fever, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. She informs you that she is a “borderline diabetic” and “only has to watch what she eats.” She tells you that she has not eaten for 3 days and has had difficulty “keeping liquids down.” While doing the nursing history, she describes her urine as dark...
A small group of participants are asked how often they meditate. Then they are given a...
A small group of participants are asked how often they meditate. Then they are given a lecture on the benefits of meditation. Following the lecture they are again asked how often they meditate. Did the lecture increase the number of days they meditate? What is the t observed? What is the appropriate decision?(You'll use this problem in the next question.) # Days Meditate Before Lecture # Days Meditate After Lecture 29 19 31 33 27 23 22 24 32 20...
Epidemiologists conducted a case-control study of asthma and asked participants if they had ever worked in...
Epidemiologists conducted a case-control study of asthma and asked participants if they had ever worked in a factory. They stratified their analysis by smoking. Smoking is associated with asthma and working in a factory. Odds ratio for smokers = 500x100/150x200 = 1.66 Odds ratio for non-smokers = 250x200/200x75= 3.33 Question- By looking at odd ratios, Do you think that there is confounding, effect modification, or neither in this study?
Write a story or essay -- fiction or non-fiction – in narrative form that details a...
Write a story or essay -- fiction or non-fiction – in narrative form that details a time when you, someone else, or a fictitious character experienced a challenge or injustice in your life (or both). How did it change your/their lives?
. In an online experiment, participants were asked to react to a stimulus. Upon seeing a...
. In an online experiment, participants were asked to react to a stimulus. Upon seeing a blue screen, participants were instructed to press a key and the reaction time was measured in seconds. The same participant is also asked to press a key when seeing a red screen, with the reaction time measured. (The first color tested was randomly selected for each participant.) The results of 6 randomly sampled participants are below. Is the reaction time to the blue stimulus...
General Social Survey asked participants if they thought it was “OK” for a woman to get...
General Social Survey asked participants if they thought it was “OK” for a woman to get an abortion for any reason and also asked them for their political party affiliation. The table below summarizes the data. Yes, “Ok” No, Opposed Strong Democrat 145 123 Independent 128 282 Strong Republican 46 162 Consider the following two events: A = the event a person is a Strong Republican, B = the event a person is ok to a woman getting an abortion...
In a study of jury behavior, two samples of participants were provided details about a trial...
In a study of jury behavior, two samples of participants were provided details about a trial in which the defendant was obviously guilty. Although group 2 received the same details as group 1, the second group was also told that same evidence had been withheld from the jury by the judge. Later the participants were asked to recommend a jail sentence. The length of term suggested by each participant is presented here. Is there a significant difference between the two...
This case analysis relates to the case study, The details of the case study cover key...
This case analysis relates to the case study, The details of the case study cover key aspects of a financial report audit. For the purposes of this assignment, you are a senior auditor at Alex Gold Financial Services, an accounting firm. You have been assigned to the audit of Sheridan AV Ltd for the year ended 31 March 2021. The managing director of Sheridan AV, David Sheridan, is considering having Sheridan listed on the stock exchange and the Audit Partner,...
Can you introduce one case regarding the positive externality, and explain it with details? How does...
Can you introduce one case regarding the positive externality, and explain it with details? How does the externality impact the company’s project, and how you evaluate it? Project externality should be considered carefully when you attempt to list potential projects and do capital budgeting as a financial manager.Briefly talk about its outcomes, and attach your evaluation.
For each of the following molecules describe whether or not it can freely diffuse across a...
For each of the following molecules describe whether or not it can freely diffuse across a cell membrane. Justify your answers RNA, Cholesterol, Caron Dioxide (CO2), Sodium ions (Na+), Also, describe what the cell membrane is made of and compare it to the plasma membrane.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT