Question

In: Statistics and Probability

To assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a reference weight known to weigh exactly 1010...

To assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a reference weight known to weigh exactly 1010 grams (g) is weighed repeatedly. The scale readings are Normally distributed with standard deviation ?=0.0002σ=0.0002 g. The reference weight is weighed five times on that scale. The mean result is 10.002310.0023 g. The output from Minitab is shown for these data:

Do the five weighings provide strong evidence that the scale is not well calibrated (that is, its mean, ?μ , for weighing this weight is not 1010 g)?

(a) What hypotheses should we use to test if the scale is not well calibrated?

?0:?=10.0H0:μ=10.0 versus ??:?>10.0Ha:μ>10.0

?0:?≠10.0H0:μ≠10.0 versus ??:?=10.0Ha:μ=10.0

?0:?<10.0H0:μ<10.0 versus ??:?>10.0Ha:μ>10.0

?0:?=10.0H0:μ=10.0 versus ??:?≠10.0Ha:μ≠10.0

(b) Calculate the ?z statistic. (Enter your answer rounded to one decimal place.)

?=z=

(c) Find the ?P ‑value from the ?z statistic. What conclusion can we make based on the ?P ‑value?

We have extremely strong evidence that the scale is not well calibrated since the ?P ‑value is close to 11 .

We have extremely strong evidence that the scale is not well calibrated since the ?P ‑value is nearly zero.

We have no evidence that the scale is not well calibrated since the ?P ‑value is nearly zero.

We have extremely weak evidence that the scale is not well calibrated since the ?P ‑value is nearly zero.

(d) Give a 95%95% confidence interval for the mean weight on this scale for all possible measurements of the reference weight. (Enter your answers rounded to four decimal places.)

lower bound =

upper bound =

(e) Based on the values of the confidence interval, what can you conclude?

Since 10.010.0 is contained within the 95%95% confidence interval, we have evidence that the scale is well calibrated.

Since 10.010.0 is contained within the 95%95% confidence interval, we have evidence that the scale is not well calibrated.

Since 10.010.0 is not contained within the 95%95% confidence interval, we have evidence that the scale is well calibrated.

Since 10.010.0 is not contained within the 95%95% confidence interval, we have evidence that the scale is not well calibrated.

(c) Given the two methods used so far, select the proper explanation for why the confidence interval is more informative than the test result.

The test result only indicates that ?>10μ>10 whereas the confidence interval tells us the true value of ?μ .

The test result only indicates how different from 1010 ?μ is whereas the confidence interval tells us the true value of ?μ .

The test result only indicates that ?≠10μ≠10 whereas the confidence interval tells us what to expect for ?μ and by about how much we should recalibrate the scale.

The test result only indicates that ?<10μ<10 whereas the confidence interval tells us a range of likely values for ?

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

To assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a reference weight known to weigh exactly 1010...
To assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a reference weight known to weigh exactly 1010 grams (g) is weighed repeatedly. The scale readings are Normally distributed with standard deviation ?=0.0002σ=0.0002 g. The reference weight is weighed five times on that scale. The mean result is 10.002310.0023 g. The output from Minitab is shown for these data: (a) Do the five weighings provide strong evidence that the scale is not well calibrated (that is, its mean, ?μ , for weighing...
to assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a standard weight that is known to weigh...
to assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a standard weight that is known to weigh 1 gram is repeatedly weighed 4 times. the resulting measurements ( in grams) are : 0.95, 1.02, 1.01, 0.98. Assume that weighing by the scale when the true weight is 1 gram are normally distributed with mean u a) use these data to compute a 95% confidence interval for u B) do these data give evidence at 5% significance level that the scale is...
To assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a standard weight known to weigh 10 grams...
To assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a standard weight known to weigh 10 grams is weighed repeatedly. The scale readings are normally distributed with unknown mean (this mean is 10 grams if the scale has no bias). The standard deviation of the scale readings is known to be 0.0006 gram. (a) The weight is measured five times. The mean result is 10.0023 grams. Give a 98% confidence interval for the mean of repeated measurements of the weight. (Round...
To assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a standard weight known to weigh 10 grams...
To assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a standard weight known to weigh 10 grams is weighed repeatedly. The scale readings are normally distributed with unknown mean (this mean is 10 grams if the scale has no bias). The standard deviation of the scale readings is known to be 0.0003 gram. (a) The weight is measured three times. The mean result is 10.0023 grams. Give a 98% confidence interval for the mean of repeated measurements of the weight. (Round...
Accuracy of a laboratory scale. To assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a standard weight...
Accuracy of a laboratory scale. To assess the accuracy of a laboratory scale, a standard weight that is known to weigh 1 gram is repeatedly weighed 4 times. The resulting measurements (in grams) are: 0.95, 1.02, 1.01, 0.98. Assume that the scale weights when the true weight is 1 gram are normally distributed with sample standard deviation 0.03. At the 5% significance level, do these data provide evidence that the scale is accurate? Do the five steps to hypothesis testing...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT