In: Statistics and Probability
A 9-year-old girl did a science fair experiment in which she tested professional touch therapists to see if they could sense her energy field. She flipped a coin to select either her right hand or her left hand, and then she asked the therapists to identify the selected hand by placing their hand just under her hand without seeing it and without touching it. Among 256 trials, the touch therapists were correct 100 times. Use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that touch therapists use a method equivalent to random guesses. Do the results suggest that touch therapists are effective?
Identify the null and alternative hypotheses for this test
Identify the test statistic for this hypothesis test.
Identify the conclusion for this hypothesis test.
A.Fail to reject Upper H 0H0.
There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that touch therapists use a method equivalent to random guesses.
B.Reject Upper H 0H0.
There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that touch therapists use a method equivalent to random guesses.
C.Fail to reject Upper H 0H0.
There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that touch therapists use a method equivalent to random guesses
D. Reject Upper H 0H0.
There is not sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that touch therapists use a method equivalent to random guesses.
Do the results suggest that touch therapists are effective?
Let p denotes the true proportion of correct guesses.
ans-> B) Reject H0.
There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that touch therapists use a method equivalent to random guesses.