In: Accounting
At the beginning of year X1, a company received a 20% grant towards the cost of a new machine of RM20 million. The asset has an expected life of five with no residual value. Required: Show the extract of the statement of financial position for the years ended 31 December X1 and X2 using both the deferred income and writing off against asset methods. Ceria Bhd obtained a significant amount of grant to the government to build hotels to keep up the demand for rooms generated by the Visit Malaysia programmes. The grant received was RM50 million with the understanding that the hotel built should not cost less than RM400 million. Required: Discuss how the above scenario will be treated in the financial statements of Ceria Bhd. Mahmud acquired a plant at a gross cost of RM1.6 million on 1 October X2. The plant has an estimated life of ten years with its residual value equals to 10% of its gross cost. Mahmud uses a straight line depreciation method. At the time of its purchase,Mahmud received a government grant of 30% of its cost price. One of the terms of the grant is that if the company retains the plant for five years or more, then there is no repayment liability. If the company sells the plant within one year it has to repay 75% of the cost. This amount decreases by 20% in succeeding years. Ceria has no intention of disposing of the plant within five years. Its policy for capital based government grants is to treat them as deferred credit and and release them to income over the life of the asset to which they relate. Required: Discuss whether the company’s policy for treatment of government grant meets definition of a liability MASB Conceptual Framework. Prepare the extract of Ceria’s financial statements for the year ended 30 March X3 in respect of the plant and the grant. (i) applying the company's policy (ii) in compliance with the definition of liability in the Conceptual Framework.