In: Economics
1. Estimate the demand for soft drinks using the data provided below. 2. Interpret the coefficients and calculate the price elasticity of soft drink demand at the mean. 3. Omit price from the regression equation. Describe the signs of the estimated coefficients and the statistical significance of the coefficients. 4. Now omit both price and temperature from the regression equation. Should a marketing plan for soft drinks be designed that relocates most canned drink machines into low-income neighborhoods? Why or why not? Justify your answer.
Sate | Cans/Capita/year | 6-Pack Price | Income/Capita | Mean Temp |
Alabama | 200 | 2.19 | 11.7 | 66 |
Arizona | 150 | 1.99 | 15.3 | 62 |
Arkansas | 237 | 1.93 | 9.9 | 63 |
California | 135 | 2.59 | 22.5 | 56 |
Colorado | 121 | 2.29 | 17.1 | 52 |
Connecticut | 118 | 2.49 | 24.3 | 50 |
Delaware | 217 | 1.99 | 25.2 | 52 |
Florida | 242 | 2.29 | 16.2 | 72 |
Georgia | 295 | 1.89 | 12.6 | 64 |
Idaho | 85 | 2.39 | 14.4 | 46 |
Illinois | 114 | 2.35 | 21.6 | 52 |
Indiana | 184 | 2.19 | 18 | 52 |
Iowa | 104 | 2.21 | 14.4 | 50 |
Kansas | 143 | 2.17 | 15.3 | 56 |
Kentucky | 230 | 2.05 | 11.7 | 56 |
Louisiana | 269 | 1.97 | 13.5 | 69 |
Maine | 111 | 2.19 | 14.4 | 41 |
Maryland | 217 | 2.11 | 18.9 | 54 |
Massachusetts | 114 | 2.29 | 19.8 | 47 |
Michigan | 108 | 2.25 | 18.9 | 47 |
Minnesota | 108 | 2.31 | 16.2 | 41 |
Mississippi | 248 | 1.98 | 9 | 65 |
Missouri | 203 | 1.94 | 17.1 | 57 |
Montana | 77 | 2.31 | 17.1 | 44 |
Nebraska | 97 | 2.28 | 14.4 | 49 |
Nevada | 166 | 2.19 | 21.6 | 48 |
New Hampshire | 177 | 2.27 | 16.2 | 35 |
New Jersey | 143 | 2.31 | 21.6 | 54 |
New Mexico | 157 | 2.17 | 13.5 | 56 |
New York | 111 | 2.43 | 22.5 | 48 |
North Carolina | 330 | 1.89 | 11.7 | 59 |
North Dakota | 63 | 2.33 | 12.6 | 39 |
Ohio | 165 | 2.21 | 19.8 | 51 |
Oklahoma | 184 | 2.19 | 14.4 | 82 |
Oregon | 68 | 2.25 | 17.1 | 51 |
Pennsylvania | 121 | 2.31 | 18 | 50 |
Rhonde Island | 138 | 2.23 | 18 | 50 |
South Carolina | 237 | 1.93 | 10.8 | 65 |
South Dakota | 95 | 2.34 | 11.7 | 45 |
Tennessee | 236 | 2.19 | 11.7 | 60 |
Texas | 222 | 2.08 | 15.3 | 69 |
Utah | 100 | 2.37 | 14.4 | 50 |
Vermont | 64 | 2.36 | 14.4 | 44 |
Virginia | 270 | 2.04 | 14.4 | 58 |
Washington | 77 | 2.19 | 18 | 49 |
West Virginia | 144 | 2.11 | 13.5 | 55 |
Wisconsin | 97 | 2.38 | 17.1 | 46 |
Wyoming | 102 | 2.31 | 17.1 | 46 |
1).
So, consider the given problem here the given regression model is given by.
=> Q = b0 + b1*P + b2*M + b3*T, where “Q=demand for cans”, “P=Price of cans”, “M=income” and “T=mean temperature”. So, the following table shows the regression result on the basis of the given data.
So, here the estimated equation is given by.
=> Q = 514.27 + (-242.97)*P + 1.36*M + 2.93*T.
2).
So, here the coefficient of “P” is “(-242.97)”, => as “P” increases by “$1”, => the demand will decreases by “242.97 = 243 units”. Now, the coefficient of “M” is “1.36”, => if “M” increases by “$1”, => the demand will increases by “1.36 units” and the coefficient of “mean temperature” is “2.93”, => if “T” increases by “1unit”, => the demand will increases by “2.93 units, =>3 units”.
Now, “dQ/dP = (-242.97)”, => the elasticity is given by, => e = (dQ/dP)*(P/Q) = (-242.97)*(P/Q), be the elasticity of demand.
3).
Now, let’s assume the “P” is omitted, => the new model is given by.
=> Q = b0 + b2*M + b3*T.
Now, if we regress the new model then the estimated model is given by.
=> Q = (-56.61) + (-2.28)*M + 4.7*T. So, here the intercept term is negative economically which don’t make sense, as we know that demand can’t be negative. Now, the coefficient of “M” is “(-2.28)” which is negative, => as “M” increases by “$1”, => “Q” decreases by “2.28 units”. Now the “’p” value of “M” is “0.2638”, => the variable is insignificant either at “5% level of significance” or “1% level of significance”.
Now, the coefficient of “T” is “4.7” which is positive, => as “T” increases by “1 unit”, => “Q” also increases by “4.7 units”. Now the “’p” value of “T” is “0.000001 < 1%”, => the variable is significant either at “1% level of significance”.
4).
Now, omit both “P” and “T”,= > the new model is given by “Q = b0 + b1*M”. Consider the following table.
So, here the estimated regression equation is given by, => Q = 254.56 + (-5.97)*M”. So, here also the sig of “M” is negative which is “(-5.97)”, => as “M” increases by “$1” the demand decrease by “5.97 = 6 units”. Now, the “p-value” of “M” is “0.02016 < 5%”, => the “M” is significant at the “5%” level of significance”. Now, even if “M” is significant here the estimated values are unbiased because we have omitted “P” and “T” these are the most important variables here, => if we omit these variables, => the problem of omitted variable will be created, => the estimated value of “M’ is biased. So, the marketing plan should not design their plan in that way.