In: Statistics and Probability
Hw 28 #2
A recent poll of 2500 randomly selected 18-25-year-olds revealed that 290 currently use marijuana or hashish. According to a publication, 12.5 % of 18-25-year-olds were current users of marijuana or hashish in 1997. Do the data provide sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of 18-25-year-olds who currently use marijuana or hashish has changed from the 1997 percentage of 12.5 %? Use α=0.01 significance level.
test statistic z=
positive critical z score=
negative critical z score=
The final conclusion is
A. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of 18-25-year-olds who currently use marijuana or hashish has changed from the 1997 percentage of 12.5 12.5 %.
B. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of 18-25-year-olds who currently use marijuana or hashish has changed from the 1997 percentage of 12.5 12.5 %.
Here we have given that,
n=number of randomly selected 18-25 year old in recent poll=2500
x: number of randomly selected 18-25-year-old revealed that currently, they use marijuana or hashish= 290
Now, we estimate the sample proportion as
=sample proportion randomly selected 18-25-year-old revealed that currently, they use marijuana or hashish
=
Claim: To check whether the proportion of 18-25 year olds who currently use marijuana or hashish has changed form the 1997 proportion of 0.125 i.e. 12.5%
The null and alternative hypothesis are as follows,
Versus
where p is the population proportion of 18-25-year-olds were current users of marijuana or hashish in 1997 = 12.5%=0.125
This is the two-tailed test.
Now, we can find the test statistic is as follows,
Z-statistics=
=
= -1.36
The test statistics is -1.36
Now we find the critical value,
= level of significance= 0.01
= Zcritical (0.005)
= 2.58 or -2.58 Using EXCEL software =(NORMSINV(probability =0.005))
The positive critical z score = 2.58
The negative critical z score = -2.58
Decision rule:
Reject Ho Null hypothesis if the test statistics is either larger than positive critical value or smaller than negative critical value otherwise fail to reject Ho.
Decision:
Here, Z-statistics (-1.36) < the Positive z-critical value (2.58)
i.e. we fail to reject the Null hypothesis Ho.
Conclusion:
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the percentage of 18-25-year-olds who currently use marijuana or hashish has changed from the 1997 percentage of 12.5% i.e. 0.125