In: Statistics and Probability
In a recent poll of
740740
randomly selected? adults,
588588
said that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax returns. Use a
0.050.05
significance level to test the claim that
7575?%
of adults say that it is morally wrong to not report all income on tax returns. Identify the null? hypothesis, alternative? hypothesis, test? statistic, P-value, conclusion about the null? hypothesis, and final conclusion that addresses the original claim. Use the? P-value method. Use the normal distribution as an approximation of the binomial distribution. test statistic z- round to 2 decimal places
p(hat)= 588/740=0.7946
n= 740
........... two tail
test
alpha= 0.05
Test Statistics
Z= (p(hat)-P)/sqrt(p*q/n)
=(0.7946-0.75)/sqrt(0.75*0.25/740)
=2.8015
rounded z statistics= 2.80
P-value=P(Z>2.8015)=0.002542935 (this p-value is for
one tail to get p-value for two tail we need to multiply it by 2.)
rounded p-value=2*0.00254=0.00508
Decision making
P-value ? Alpha Reject H0
0.00508<0.05
there is enough evidence to support the claim that adults who says
it is morally wrong to not report all income tax returns is
different from 75%.
OR
there is not 75% of adults say that it is morally wrong to not
report all income on tax returns.
when we reject null hypothesis alternate hypothesis become
true.
.......................
you can ask any doubt in comment.