In: Accounting
How does the concept of good faith affect the buyer’s right of rejection under the Perfect Tender Rule?
Under the perfect tender rule, the seller or lessor has an
obligation to ship or tender conforming goods, and if goods or
tender of delivery fail in any respect, the buyer or lessee has the
right to accept the goods, reject the entire shipment, or accept
part and reject part.
Exceptions to the perfect tender rule may be established by
agreement. When tender is rejected because of nonconforming goods
and the time for performance has not yet expired, the seller or
lessor can notify the buyer or lessee promptly of the intention to
cure and can then do so within the contract time for performance.
Once the time for performance has expired, the seller or lessor
can, for a reasonable time, exercise the right to cure if he or she
had, at the time of delivery, reasonable grounds to believe that
the nonconforming tender would be acceptable to the buyer or
lessee. When an agreed-on manner of delivery becomes impracticable
or unavailable through no fault of either party, a seller may
choose a commercially reasonable substitute. In an installment
contract, a buyer or lessee can reject an installment only if the
nonconformity substantially impairs the value of the installment
and cannot be cured. Delay in delivery or nondelivery in whole or
in part is not a breach when performance is commercially
impracticable. If an unexpected event totally destroys goods
identified at the time the contract is formed through no fault of
either party and before risk passes to the buyer or lessee, the
parties are excused from performance. If a party has reasonable
grounds to believe that the other party will not perform, he or she
may in writing demand assurance of performance from the other
party. Until such assurance is received, he or she may suspend
further performance. Finally, when required cooperation is not
forthcoming, the cooperative party can suspend her or his own
performance without liability.