In: Economics
A new processing facility is being designed by an engineering project team. Your boss has asked you to design a catalytic system that requires pumping a hydrocarbon slurry that is corrosive and contains abrasive particles. You have narrowed your selection of pumps to two different models. Each pump will satisfy the needs of the project and they both have the same output capacity. The accompanying table lists the costs and other financial data for the two pumps. Complete an Annual Worth Analysis using a MARR of 9% per year and determine which manufacturer should be selected. Complete all calculations to the nearest dollar.
Manufacturer: | Ingersoll Rand | Sulzer Bingham |
Initial Cost | $42,000 | $60,000 |
Electrical Cost | $2,750 per year | $2,125 per year |
Maintenance Cost | $1,750 in year one increasing by 3% per year thereafter | $750 in year three increasing by $150 per year thereafter |
Overhaul Cost | None | $4,000 in year four |
Salvage Value | $4,000 | $5,500 |
Useful Life | 4 Years | 8 Years |
Working notes:
(1) For both projects, Total cost = Electrical cost + maintenance cost
(In year 0, Total cost = Initial cost)
(2) For Sulzar, Total cost in year 4 will be higher by $4,000 (Overhaul cost).
(3) For both projects, Total cost in their terminal year will be lower by amount of salvage value.
(4) Accordingly, Present Worth (PW) of both are computed as follows.
INGERSOLL RAND | |||||
Year | Electrical Cost ($) | Maintenance Cost ($) | Total cost ($) | PV Factor @9% | Discounted Total cost ($) |
(A) | (B) | (C)=(A)+(B) | (D) | (C)x(D) | |
0 | 42,000 | 1.0000 | 42,000 | ||
1 | 2,750 | 1,750 | 4,500 | 0.9174 | 4,128 |
2 | 2,750 | 1,803 | 4,553 | 0.8417 | 3,832 |
3 | 2,750 | 1,857 | 4,607 | 0.7722 | 3,557 |
4 | 2,750 | 1,912 | 662 | 0.7084 | 469 |
PW ($) = | 53,986 | ||||
SULZAR BINGHAM | |||||
Year | Electrical Cost ($) | Maintenance Cost ($) | Total cost ($) | PV Factor @9% | Discounted Total cost ($) |
(A) | (B) | (C)=(A)+(B) | (D) | (C)x(D) | |
0 | 60,000 | 1.0000 | 60,000 | ||
1 | 2,125 | 2,125 | 0.9174 | 1,950 | |
2 | 2,125 | 2,125 | 0.8417 | 1,789 | |
3 | 2,125 | 750 | 2,875 | 0.7722 | 2,220 |
4 | 2,125 | 900 | 7,025 | 0.7084 | 4,977 |
5 | 2,125 | 1,050 | 3,175 | 0.6499 | 2,064 |
6 | 2,125 | 1,200 | 3,325 | 0.5963 | 1,983 |
7 | 2,125 | 1,350 | 3,475 | 0.5470 | 1,901 |
8 | 2,125 | 1,500 | -1,875 | 0.5019 | -941 |
PW ($) = | 75,941 |
(5) Annual worth (AW) = PW / PVIFA(9%, N)
AW, Ingersoll ($) = 53,986 / PVIFA(9%, 4) = 53,986 / 3.2397** = 16,664
AW, Sulzar ($) = 75,941 / PVIFA(9%, 8) = 75,941 / 5.5348** = 13,721
Since Sulzar has lower AW of costs, this should be selected.
**From PVIFA factor tables