Question

In: Economics

Consider two alternative reforms to the Disability Insurance (DI) system in the United States. Pay different...

  1. Consider two alternative reforms to the Disability Insurance (DI) system in the United States.
  • Pay different DI benefits for different types of disabilities (e.g., you get 30% of benefits if you have an injured back and 50% of benefits if are paralyzed).
  • Amplify the stigma associated with receipt of social insurance, by enforcing a requirement that individuals receiving DI have a sign that declares “Mooch on Society” planted on the recipient’s lawn.
  1. Explain the rationale behind each proposal using the concepts of consumption smoothing and moral hazard.
  2. Explain the downside of each proposal.

Solutions

Expert Solution

The first proposal uses the concept of consumption smoothing, i.e. trying to have relatively similar consumption in all states of the world, so as to avoid the case of a bounty in one and penury in the other. If someone has an injured back, the negative effect on consumption is low. So a small part of the insurance should be used. When a more serious ailment happens, like a paralysis, to have the same level of consumption, more benefits are required.

Moral hazard refers to when, due to the availability of insurance, the insured becomes less careful and takes less care of the asset as he knows that he will be compensated for any damages. To prevent people from doing this, if stigma is attached to using insurance, people will use it only when absolutely necessary and will take steps to make sure they don't have to rely on insurance, thus eliminating moral hazard.

The downside of proposal A is that it can lead to moral hazard. As people are more likely to receive higher benefits for more serious disabilities, they will tend to be less and less careful. Also, smoothing is not a desirable thing always. Someone might want more if he is paralytic than when he has an injured back

The downside of proposal B is that it can have serious social ramifications. Since relying on insurance will be stigmatized, people might not use it even when required. It might also make disability looked down upon, weakening society's social fabric.


Related Solutions

Is isolationism a feasible alternative for the United States?
Is isolationism a feasible alternative for the United States?
Explain the concept of disability in the worker’s compensation system, short or long term disability insurance,...
Explain the concept of disability in the worker’s compensation system, short or long term disability insurance, and social security disability. What are the similarities among the three and what are the important differences among them. Illustrate your answers with examples.
Explain the concept of disability in the worker’s compensation system, short or long term disability insurance,...
Explain the concept of disability in the worker’s compensation system, short or long term disability insurance, and social security disability. What are the similarities among the three and what are the important differences among them. Illustrate your answers with examples
Explain the reasons for the gender pay gap in the United States. How would a system...
Explain the reasons for the gender pay gap in the United States. How would a system of equal pay for equal work change American culture and social structure?
The four major functions of the healthcare delivery system in the United States are financing, insurance,...
The four major functions of the healthcare delivery system in the United States are financing, insurance, delivery, and payment. How do you feel statistics will help administrators manage cost and deliver quality healthcare?
Consider government-provided health insurance, such as OHIP in Ontario, and government-mandated insurance, such as Obamacare in the United States
Consider the problems arising from asymmetric information:Consider government-provided health insurance, such as OHIP in Ontario, and government-mandated insurance, such as Obamacare in the United States. Are such programs intended to combat adverse selection or moral hazard? Briefly characterize the tradeoff between adverse selection and moral hazard in respect of health insurance public policy.Auto insurance policies often require deductibles and health insurance policies often require copayments. Briefly explain whether and how deductibles and copayments are intended to combat adverse selection or...
15. Compared to offering no unemployment benefits, the unemployment insurance system of the United States probably...
15. Compared to offering no unemployment benefits, the unemployment insurance system of the United States probably a. leads to longer spells of unemployment. b. decreases the unemployment rate. c. leads to lower post-unemployment wages. d. provides for a lower standard of living while unemployed.
Consider the following two-letter acronym of the following states in the United States: MD - Maryland,...
Consider the following two-letter acronym of the following states in the United States: MD - Maryland, FL - Florida, PA - Pennsylvania, Ga - Georgia, CA - California, NY - New York. Imagine that some students from the above-listed states are at a conference. Using a switch control structure write a C++ program that prompts a student at the conference to enter the two-letter acronym of his/her state and let the program print the student's state and welcome the student...
Consider two countries, the United States (U.S.) and Japan. In the U.S., there are two firms,...
Consider two countries, the United States (U.S.) and Japan. In the U.S., there are two firms, Pikes Peak Steel (PPS) and General Motors (GM), both owned by U.S. citizens. In Japan, there is one firm, Toyota, owned by Japanese citizens. All of the employees of PPS and GM are U.S. citizens and all of the employees of Toyota are Japanese citizens. In a given year, PPS produces $6000 worth of steel and pays wages of $1500. It sells $2000 worth...
Consider trade relations between the United States and Mexico. Assume that the leaders of the two...
Consider trade relations between the United States and Mexico. Assume that the leaders of the two countries believe the payoffs to alternative trade policies are shown in the following payoff matrix: United States' Decision Low Tariffs High Tariffs Mexico's Decision Low Tariffs $28 billion, $28 billion $20 billion, $30 billion High Tariffs $30 billion, $20 billion $25 billion, $25 billion The dominant strategy for the United States is always to choose   tariffs. The dominant strategy for Mexico is always to...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT