Question

What are the strengths and weaknesses of family systems theory? Please provide an example from your own experience.

Answer 1

What are the strengths and weaknesses of family systems theory?

Strengths:

• Bowen's accentuation on multigenerational issues
• Role of specialist as dynamic, master mentor, or pioneer

Weaknesses:

• Neutral position
• Constructs in light of the man centric framework
• Reinforce conventional family structure
• Focus on separation
• Family Systems Theory has not brought about a collection of particular hypothetical declarations or speculation which can be tried. (Broderick and Smith, 1979; Fitzpatrick and Noller, 1993)
• Family Systems Theory may best be seen as a representation for contemplating the family (Fitzpatrick and Noller, 1993).
• Too much concentrate on homeostasis at cost of progress
• Too much concentrate on the framework at to the detriment of the people
• A positivistic scholarly convention that puts the scientist outside the framework looking for reality.

Please provide an example from your own experience.

The identified patient of this family was Austin, a 14-year-old kid, who had gotten outpatient and inpatient emotional well-being treatment since age 7 years. His folks revealed dangerous fits of rage, poor rest averaging 2– 5 hours daily, and portrayed his temperament as on edge with unexplained scenes of crying. He had been hospitalized twice since the age of 7 and had judgments of Attention Deficit Disorder, Oppositional Defiant Disorder, and Mood Disorder (NOS); his prescriptions included sertraline, aripiprazole, and lisdexamfetamine. Oppositional conduct included annihilating property in the family home. Austin punched gaps in dividers and entryways, destroyed a sleeping cushion with a blade, and verbally debilitated his mom. His folks isolated before he was conceived and never hitched. He and his mom lived alone for the first 7 years of his life, with help from maternal fabulous guardians. His dad had no contact. At the point when Austin was 7 years old, he asked for to meet his dad. This was encouraged, and finished in his folks wedding 4 years back. His folks re-ported a steady marriage, denied conflicts, and exhibited as concerned and strong of Austin. They expressed Austin had a decent association with the two guardians. Be that as it may, through exchange, it was recognized that Austin and his dad were progressively hostile and provocative towards each other, and associations between them swelled into verbal showdowns and contentions. Austin expressed he had companions at school, took an interest in sports, yet battled scholastically – regularly accepting coming up short evaluations. Mental testing by an authorized clinician uncovered Austin scored in the marginal range for IQ. Mother had a conclusion of bipolar issue however did not take pharmaceutical; a fatherly grandma and a cousin additionally had determinations of bipolar. This family was seen for 8 sessions.

Though, the first dyad in the family is customarily the couple, when Austin's dad joined the family, Austin and his mom had relationship parts in light of a solitary family structure, with a built up parent– kid dyad. Austin's mom had likewise encountered the stressors of a solitary parent family unit that included financial weights, childcare arrangements (bolster from maternal grandparents), and restricted time and vitality for social exercises, all with no help or inclusion of the father (Pasley and Garneau, 2012). At the point when Austin's dad gone along with he family, parental and couple dyads were set up, which focused on the parent– tyke dyad amongst Austin and his mom. It was noticed that amid treatment sessions, all talking happened amongst Austin and his mom, constantly situated together on a couch. His dad sat alone on a seat, frequently with his head confronting the floor. While it appeared the father was tuning in, he didn't take part in discourses outside of brief explanations. Despite the fact that he was Austin's organic father, he was not a member for the first 7 years of Austin's life. It is sensible to think about Austin's dad as accepting the part of step-father.

His parental part was extraordinarily influenced by the child rearing style officially settled by Austin's mom. The father's endeavors to adjust these built up examples of conduct were met with significant protection by Austin, bringing about his dad ending up less included (Pasley and Garneau, 2012). Research demonstrated that kids in step-parent connections occupied with more elevated amounts of conflicts with both parent and step-parent and were more influenced by conflicts emerging from parent/step-parent conflicts that prompt antagonistic child rearing (Shelton, Walters, and Harold, 2008)