Question

The protection of individuals’ right to life is at the core of the individualist, puritan, and permissivist views on welfare. Yet, despite this seemingly shared starting point, these positions support differing views on citizens’ rights to welfare. Task: Explain each view and their relation to the right to life. What does each view entail with regard to citizens’ rights to welfare? What role does the right to life play in each position and how does it differ? Your aim is to explain how such opposing views on welfare emerge from what seems to be a shared starting point (that is, a common recognition of individuals’ right to life).

Answer 1

Individualistic view proposes that there is no lawful rights for anybody to get any advantages, lenient view recommends that everybody has the privilege to unrestricted government assistance benefits and the puritan see recommends that the everybody has the legitimate option to work gave they are eager to work and contribute. Albeit tolerant and puritan see proposes that individuals are entitled top government assistance lawfully, puritan see sets a condition that without dynamic commitment and ability to work, one shouldn't be given any government assistance. In spite of the fact that individuals who have confidence in the individualistic viewpoint would prefer not to impart their commitment to the individuals who don't contribute, they concur on the way that it relies upon singular readiness to participate in good cause. Nonetheless, past imbalance, foul play and separation dependent on race and sex has driven the general public to take part in positive activities and social government assistance projects to help the poor and the individuals who can't uphold themselves, for example, the handicapped, youngsters, ladies, jobless, older and so forth