Question

Please answer in microsoft word and cite sources if any

For The pharmaceutical industry; analyze the industry’s profit maximizing strategies in the short run and long run

Answer 1

Long Term Strategies – Forward Integration Model

Long Term Strategies

Pharma companies are focussing on forward joining, directed treatment arrangements, and biotech medicates as their long term techniques.

Forward Integration

The incorporated pharma display packs drugs, social insurance and medicinal gear administrations, in this way obscuring the market limits. At present, customized drugs are focused towards particular gatherings of the populace with comparable genomics. Pharma companies will require visit understanding associations and updates.

The forward joining of pharma and social insurance administrations is bringing about human services booths possessed by pharma companies or medicinal services companies.

The booth will advance the coordinated wellbeing oversaw mind display, utilizing the best medicinal gear and focused on treatment arrangements. The valuing structure will be based on the adequacy and accomplishment of the treatment.

Income Model

Pharma companies are laying committed channels for their medications, notwithstanding including social insurance administrations. Their social insurance stands will recognize people in the hazard gatherings, assemble coordinate connections and go into lifetime treatment models.

Incomes will originate from tests, items and administrations identified with treatment, recovery and support. Incomes are required to move from quality sequencing items to proteomics and practical genomics related instrumentation and consumables.

Long Term Strategies

- Targeted Treatment Solution

Directed Treatment Solution Many pharmaceutical companies bolted into the square buster model of medication improvement are seeing unavoidable losses in deals and advertising. As research in customized drugs turns out to be further developed, portfolios are beginning to move towards treatments that objective genotypespecific understanding populaces. Illness administration is taking pharma companies towards custom fitted treatment arrangements. Exercises of Main Players Personalized solution is ready to demonstrate promising outcomes in the coming years, and all the substantial pharmaceutical companies have set up divisions to explore its potential.Roche, liable to be a main player later on, has propelled the world' s first "quality chip" to test the response of people to drugs.

In excess of 20 driving pharmaceutical, biotechnology, diagnostics and data innovation companies, and significant scholastic focuses and legislative offices have met up to shape another association called the Personalized Medicine Coalition (PMC). Situated in Washington DC, the PMC is a nongovernmental, non-benefit assemble made to encourage comprehension and appropriation of customized prescription for the advantage of patients. American Home Products is engaged with a few quality based R&D ventures. Its heart disappointment sedate for dark Americans - Bidilfrom Nitromed-has had exceptionally effective US clinical trials. U.S. controllers have approvedTarceva, the lung malignancy tranquilize fromGenentechInc. The once-every day pill targets human epidermal development factor receptors, blocking them from permitting tumor cell

Challenges Identified in Personalised Drugs R&D will undergo major restructuring from mass market to individual prescribed markets. Patients for clinical trials will need to be recruited from all therapeutic classes.

There will be problems in getting regulatory approval from the FDA to monitor patients after the launch of products. The sales force will need completely revamped training to sell individualised therapies to specialists.

The manufacturing process, including supply, is currently incapable of handling small volumes of complex products. It will involve large supply chains, and will have a very complex structure to deal with many molecules at a time.

The Revenue Model

Directed Treatment Solutions (TTS) are expanding the market measure for pharma companies. TTS as customized drugs are relied upon to catch over 75% of the Big Pharma incomes in the following a few decades. Wellbeing administration is being focused by all companies as a noteworthy advance to defeat the loss of incomes coming about because of patent expiry.

While the market for customized drugs is littler than conventional square busters, it could in any case be generous. For instance, Genentech' stotal offers of Herceptinsince its dispatch in late 1998 have surpassed $800 million, notwithstanding the item just being suitable for use in 25 - 30% of ladies with bosom malignancy. Solid security and viability cases may enable companies to keep up premium costs.

The advancement of genomic items includes littler trials and lower whittling down rates. This could essentially lessen obligation cases, while coordinate to-purchaser publicizing could turn out to be pretty much repetitive and deals powers could recoil.

Novartis'Gleevecwas the principal tranquilize focusing on the atomic premise of thedisease, and was instantly acknowledged by the market, producing overall incomes of $1.13 billion.

Short Term Strategies – The Semi Block Buster Model

Piece Buster to Semi Block Busters The square buster approach is being supplanted with semi piece busters in terms of 3-4 NMES supplanting the 1 CME square buster. There has been an enormous money related and social rebuilding of the Big Pharmas.

By 2008, US pharma companies will lose incomes of near $40 billion because of patent terminations, while overall misfortunes will add up to more than $72 billion. The substitution will just come as 80 to 100 NMEs for the US advertise and 160 forthe overall market.

The Big Pharmas are decreasing their concentration regions to a couple of infections; for e.g., Abbott Laboratories has cut back its 13 territories to only five today. The Big Pharmas need to leave the hopelessly misfortunes of piece busters. In any case, square busters will keep on being the real income hotspot for the coming couple of years.

This will be trailed by a period of "another combat zone", who will center around developing open doors in particular concentration gatherings and divided markets, with high esteem and low volume customized medicines.

Non specific versus Patent Competition Patent based Pharma companies are searching for approaches to protract the income surges of their items, and face the danger on their incomes from another type of bland companies. Companies are changing patients to cutting edge medications to adjust the drop in incomes because of bland substitutions. Open, political, and administrative changes in bland arranging are further factors in the non specific moral medication battle.

Development in the Generic Market The generics business is encountering remarkable development. Nine of the main 10 quickest developing pharma companies are non specific and have a development rate of more than 12%. Of the 10,375 medications recorded in the FDA's Orange Book, 7,602 have bland partners. Generics companies are gaining by patent expiry openings offered by year 2005 on drugs with incomes of $100 billion. Numerous are advancing into fullyfledged, R&D-based, pharmaceutical companies. The Big Pharmas are additionally worried about Medicare support to non specific medications.

"Without an approved bland item, a nonexclusive firm with 180-day eliteness could harvest a 1,000 percent ROI. With an approved nonexclusive item available, the ROI decreases by about half to approx 500%

Reducing Gaps in Generic and Patent Oriented Companies

With Big Pharmas companies like Novartis, Abbott Laboratories, and Merck resorting to more branded generic products, the gap between generic and patented drugs will be reduced. The big players will acquire generic companies to replace their original product lines, and offset their losses by replacing the generic product with a better priced, more innovative and effective formulation drug.

The generics market was recently affected by the failure of R&D molecules in advanced stages of development by Ranbaxyand Dr Reddy' s Laboratories, increasing competition, price erosion in generic drugs in international markets, and comparatively rich stock market valuations.

Several generic drug companies like Watson Pharmaceuticals, Barr Pharmaceuticals, Ranbaxy, and Dr. Reddy’s are now developing patented medicines.

Brand Equalisation

Pharma companies are engaging in brand equalisation to reach a larger number of people through pharmacies. They are offering higher incentives to pharmacists to overcome competition from generic drugs.

Short Term Strategies –Pre-and Post-Patent Based

Strategies:

Pre-and Post-Patent Short and mid term strategies of pharma companies are based on issues like patent extension and post-patent competition. Lilly is working on a new strategy to "slow the erosion" ofZyprexasales in the United States. Late-stage pipeline products, mostly obtained through Pfizer' s M&A strategy, will play a central role in compensating for the loss of around US$14 billion in revenues through generic competition.

Patent Extension

The Big Pharmas are trying to extend their patents with smarter and timely reformulation in a bid to prevent the irreparable loss of revenue that would result from expiry of patents. Pharma companies are exploiting regulatory benefits, and adding new formulations and indications.

The extension of patents in pediatric sectors is an reflection of how Pharma companies are extending their patent rights and avoiding immediate losses from loss of patents. However, the FDA modernisation act has added norms to restrict single extension of patents. Sumitomo Pharma and

Daiichi Suntoryhave received extensions of more than 3.5 years for their drugs.

Post Patent Competition: OTC Post patent expiry commercial defence tactics include line and indication extensions, and the switch to over-thecounter status in the US.

Pharma companies are planning to buy back generic companies, and launch similar products with new formulations and extra pricing to fit the semi block buster model.

Most of the Pharma companies are aiming for the $49.8 billion OTC market globally, which is growing at an average rate of 3%. They are trying to increase the life of their molecules by getting the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to convert their patented prescription drugs to overthe-counter just prior to patent expiration.

Pharma companies are aiming at increasing the size of their operations and developing a focussed portfolio with more R&D to fight against generic competition from small companies entering the market. They already have an installed base with a good distribution network, and established brand image. By switching from ethical marketing to OTC marketing they will enter the free markets. This move will coerce other players in the market to work in the same direction.

Aggressive Marketing Pharma companies are adopting aggressive marketing strategies to bank on early sales of newly launched products. This gives their product a larger life time before expiry of patents.

Companies are cooperating with the media and branding companies to formulate successful launch strategies for highly matured therapeutic and less matured therapeutic markets. Launched globally, with massive penetration, these products help compensate for revenue loss through patent expiry. Pharma companies are able to earn revenues of above $1 billion within a year.

Niche pharma companies are also adopting a similar approach.

Common Strategies Against Generics Big Pharma companies are fighting generic threats through innovation, investment in generic models of their own drugs, and price reduction. Advancements in packaging and delivery systems do not have any significant impact on pre-and postpatent strategies.

Short Term Strategies Against Parallel Trade

Development in Parallel Trade Differences in offering costs for similar medications in different nations, and government cost controls in numerous nations, are bringing about expanding parallel exchange.

The EU' s single market lead of free development of products guarantee that surplus benefit can be made just by moving medications from a nation where the cost is lower, (for example, Spain) to another where they are sold at a higher value (like the UK).

Despite the fact that companies remain to lose by offering drugs at less expensive costs, measures like supply quantities for singular nations and particular estimating arrangements have demonstrated incapable.

Parallel imports are encouraged by higher costs for chose items, simple authorizing techniques for parallel imported items, and the NHS repayment framework.

Pharma Competing Against Parallel Trade With value contrasts crosswise over Europe getting to be littler, the volume of parallel exchange prescriptions is diminishing. Medication producers are additionally attempting endeavors to acquaint standards in an offer with battle parallel exchange.

Parallel import in the EU adds up to just 1.4%. This discredits the hypothesis that parallel exchange antagonistically influences the R&D based industry as it makes inventive, patent-ensured restorative items more moderate.

The pharmaceutical business has been expanding interest in R&D as of late and their benefits have risen complex. This is to a great extent in light of the fact that the costs for creative therapeutic items overall bring benefits that far surpass speculation costs for R&D. As parallel exchange just offers the first results of the business itself, their aggregate deals volumes are not influenced.

The European Court of Justice requested in October 2004 that GlaxoSmithKline ought to be permitted to confine a few supplies of pharmaceuticals to Greece, a low-evaluated advertise.