Question

In: Statistics and Probability

In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to...

In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, Form 2 of the Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was administered to both an experimental group and a control group after 6 weeks of instruction, during which the experimental group received peer tutoring and the control group did not. For the experimental group n1 = 30 children, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of the test was x1 = 368.4, with sample standard deviation s1 = 39.3. The average score on the vocabulary portion of the test for the n2 = 30 subjects in the control group was x2 = 349.4 with sample standard deviation s2 = 56.4. (a) Use a 1% level of significance to test the claim that the experimental group performed better than the control group. (i) What is the level of significance? 0.01 Correct: Your answer is correct. State the null and alternate hypotheses. H0: μ1 = μ2; H1: μ1 > μ2 H0: μ1 ≠ μ2; H1: μ1 = μ2 H0: μ1 = μ2; H1: μ1 ≠ μ2 H0: μ1 = μ2; H1: μ1 < μ2 . (ii) What sampling distribution will you use? What assumptions are you making? The standard normal. Both sample sizes are large with known standard deviations. The Student's t. Both sample sizes are large with unknown standard deviations. The Student's t. Both sample sizes are large with known standard deviations. The standard normal. Both sample sizes are large with unknown standard deviations. . What is the value of the sample test statistic? Compute the corresponding z or t value as appropriate. (Test the difference μ1 − μ2. Round your answer to three decimal places.) (iii) Find (or estimate) the P-value. P-value > 0.250 0.125 < P-value < 0.250 0.050 < P-value < 0.125 0.025 < P-value < 0.050 0.005 < P-value < 0.025 P-value < 0.005 Sketch the sampling distribution and show the area corresponding to the P-value. WebAssign Plot WebAssign Plot WebAssign Plot WebAssign Plot . (iv) Based on your answers in parts (i)−(iii), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level α? At the α = 0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant. At the α = 0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant. At the α = 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant. At the α = 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant. (v) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application. Reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the mean score for the experimental group is higher than for the control group. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the mean score for the experimental group is higher than for the control group. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the mean score for the experimental group is higher than for the control group. Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the mean score for the experimental group is higher than for the control group. (b) Find a 98% confidence interval for μ1 − μ2. (Round your answers to two decimal places.) lower limit upper limit Explain the meaning of the confidence interval in the context of the problem. Because the interval contains only positive numbers, this indicates that at the 98% confidence level, the population mean score for the experimental group was higher than for the control group. Because the interval contains both positive and negative numbers, this indicates that at the 98% confidence level, we cannot say that the population mean score for the experimental group was higher than for the control group. Because the interval contains both positive and negative numbers, this indicates that at the 98% confidence level, the population mean score for the experimental group was lower than for the control group. Because the interval contains only negative numbers, this indicates that at the 98% confidence level, the population mean score for the experimental group was lower than for the

Solutions

Expert Solution

Given
X1 bar 368.4 X2 bar 349.4
S1 39.3 S2 56.4
n1 30 n2 30

a)

Hypothesis:

H0: μ1 = μ2; H1: μ1 > μ2

t Critical Value :

tc = 2.3924 (Use t table)

Rejection region:

tstat > tcritical, To reject H0

Test:

Sp^2 = ((n1-1)S1^2+(n2-1)S2^2)/(n1+n2-2) = 2362.725

t stat = (X1 bar-X2 bar )/SQRT(Sp^2*(1/n1 + 1/n2)) = 1.5139

P value:

P value = 0.0677 (use t table)

P value > 0.01, Do not reject H0

At the α = 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant

Conclusion:

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the mean score for the experimental group is higher than for the control group.

b)

98% confidence interval for μ1 − μ2

CI Equal variance
tc 2.392377475 T.INV.2T(D1,D2)
Upper 49.02552872 (X1 bar-X2 bar )+tc*Sp*SQRT(1/n1 + 1/n2)
Lower -11.02552872 (X1 bar-X2 bar )-tc*Sp*SQRT(1/n1 + 1/n2)

CI = (-11.0255, 49.0255)

Because the interval contains both positive and negative numbers, this indicates that at the 98% confidence level, we cannot say that the population mean score for the experimental group was higher than for the control group.


Related Solutions

In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, the mildly retarded children were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group received peer tutoring along with regular instruction, and the control group received regular instruction with no peer tutoring. There were n1 = n2 = 31 children in each group. The Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was given to both groups before instruction...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, Form 2 of the Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was administered to both an experimental group and a control group after 6 weeks of instruction, during which the experimental group received peer tutoring and the control group did not. For the experimental group n1 = 30 children, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, Form 2 of the Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was administered to both an experimental group and a control group after 6 weeks of instruction, during which the experimental group received peer tutoring and the control group did not. For the experimental group n1 = 30 children, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, Form 2 of the Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was administered to both an experimental group and a control group after 6 weeks of instruction, during which the experimental group received peer tutoring and the control group did not. For the experimental group n1 = 30 children, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of...
Defined Mental Retardation. Analyse the levels of Mental Retardation.
Defined Mental Retardation. Analyse the levels of Mental Retardation.
1. An article from an Environmental Engineering journal reported the results of a study on the...
1. An article from an Environmental Engineering journal reported the results of a study on the occurrence of sodium and chloride on the surface of water currents in Rhode Island. The following data presents the concentration of chloride designated ? (in milligrams per liter) and the taxiway area in the basin as ? (in percentage). ? 4.4 6.6 9.7 10.6 10.8 10.9 ? 0.19 0.15 0.57 0.70 0.67 0.63 ? 11.8 12.1 14.3 14.7 15.0 17.3 ? 0.47 0.70 0.60...
summarize and analyze a peer-reviewed journal article that presents qualitative research results (effective communication and adapting...
summarize and analyze a peer-reviewed journal article that presents qualitative research results (effective communication and adapting to change within workplace scenarios). Are there any key insights from the qualitative article.
An article in the journal Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials (Vol. 6, 1989) reported the results...
An article in the journal Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials (Vol. 6, 1989) reported the results of an analysis of the weight of calcium in standard cement and cement doped with lead. Reduced levels of calcium would indicate that the hydration mechanism in the cement is blocked and would allow water to attack various locations in the cement structure. Ten samples of standard cement had an average weight percent calcium of 90.0, with a sample standard deviation of 5.0 and...
A scientific journal article reported the following results of tissue assay for liver manganese (ppm) in...
A scientific journal article reported the following results of tissue assay for liver manganese (ppm) in chicks fed high Ca diets: 6.02, 6.08, 7.11, 5.73, 5.32, 7.10, 5.29, 5.84, 6.03, 5.99, 4.53, 6.81, Is there evidence that the variance in liver manganese content in chicks fed high Ca diets is less than 0.6 ppm2?
You read in the results section of an article in a psychology journal that the results...
You read in the results section of an article in a psychology journal that the results of at-test for independent sample means revealed a significant t12 = 1.8, with σˆX1−X2 = 2. If there were 8 participants in the experimental group, (a) how many participants were in the corresponding control group? (b) what significance level was used, and was the test a one-tailed or a two-tailed test? (c) what was the mean difference between the experimental and the control groups?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT