Question

In: Statistics and Probability

In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to...

In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, the mildly retarded children were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group received peer tutoring along with regular instruction, and the control group received regular instruction with no peer tutoring. There were n1 = n2 = 31 children in each group. The Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was given to both groups before instruction began. For the experimental group, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of the test was x1 = 344.5, with sample standard deviation s1 = 45.9. For the control group, the mean score on the same test was x2 = 329.7, with sample standard deviation s2 = 49.7. Use a 1% level of significance to test the hypothesis that there was no difference in the vocabulary scores of the two groups before the instruction began.

(a) What is the level of significance?

State the null and alternate hypotheses.

H0: μ1 = μ2; H1: μ1 > μ2

H0: μ1 ≠ μ2; H1: μ1 = μ2

H0: μ1 = μ2; H1: μ1 ≠ μ2

H0: μ1 = μ2; H1: μ1 < μ2

(b) What sampling distribution will you use? What assumptions are you making?

The standard normal. Both sample sizes are large with unknown standard deviations

The standard normal. Both sample sizes are large with known standard deviations.

The Student's t. Both sample sizes are large with unknown standard deviations.

The Student's t. Both sample sizes are large with known standard deviations.

What is the value of the sample test statistic? (Test the difference μ1 − μ2. Round your answer to three decimal places.)

(c) Find (or estimate) the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.)

(d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Are the data statistically significant at level α?

At the α = 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.

At the α = 0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.

At the α = 0.01 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.

At the α = 0.01 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.

(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application.

Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that there is a difference in mean vocabulary scores between the control and experimental groups.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that there is a difference in mean vocabulary scores between the control and experimental groups.

Reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that there is a difference in mean vocabulary scores between the control and experimental groups.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that there is a difference in mean vocabulary scores between the control and experimental groups.

Solutions

Expert Solution


Related Solutions

In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, Form 2 of the Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was administered to both an experimental group and a control group after 6 weeks of instruction, during which the experimental group received peer tutoring and the control group did not. For the experimental group n1 = 30 children, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, Form 2 of the Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was administered to both an experimental group and a control group after 6 weeks of instruction, during which the experimental group received peer tutoring and the control group did not. For the experimental group n1 = 30 children, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, Form 2 of the Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was administered to both an experimental group and a control group after 6 weeks of instruction, during which the experimental group received peer tutoring and the control group did not. For the experimental group n1 = 30 children, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to...
In the journal Mental Retardation, an article reported the results of a peer tutoring program to help mildly mentally retarded children learn to read. In the experiment, Form 2 of the Gates-MacGintie Reading Test was administered to both an experimental group and a control group after 6 weeks of instruction, during which the experimental group received peer tutoring and the control group did not. For the experimental group n1 = 30 children, the mean score on the vocabulary portion of...
Defined Mental Retardation. Analyse the levels of Mental Retardation.
Defined Mental Retardation. Analyse the levels of Mental Retardation.
1. An article from an Environmental Engineering journal reported the results of a study on the...
1. An article from an Environmental Engineering journal reported the results of a study on the occurrence of sodium and chloride on the surface of water currents in Rhode Island. The following data presents the concentration of chloride designated ? (in milligrams per liter) and the taxiway area in the basin as ? (in percentage). ? 4.4 6.6 9.7 10.6 10.8 10.9 ? 0.19 0.15 0.57 0.70 0.67 0.63 ? 11.8 12.1 14.3 14.7 15.0 17.3 ? 0.47 0.70 0.60...
summarize and analyze a peer-reviewed journal article that presents qualitative research results (effective communication and adapting...
summarize and analyze a peer-reviewed journal article that presents qualitative research results (effective communication and adapting to change within workplace scenarios). Are there any key insights from the qualitative article.
An article in the journal Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials (Vol. 6, 1989) reported the results...
An article in the journal Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials (Vol. 6, 1989) reported the results of an analysis of the weight of calcium in standard cement and cement doped with lead. Reduced levels of calcium would indicate that the hydration mechanism in the cement is blocked and would allow water to attack various locations in the cement structure. Ten samples of standard cement had an average weight percent calcium of 90.0, with a sample standard deviation of 5.0 and...
A scientific journal article reported the following results of tissue assay for liver manganese (ppm) in...
A scientific journal article reported the following results of tissue assay for liver manganese (ppm) in chicks fed high Ca diets: 6.02, 6.08, 7.11, 5.73, 5.32, 7.10, 5.29, 5.84, 6.03, 5.99, 4.53, 6.81, Is there evidence that the variance in liver manganese content in chicks fed high Ca diets is less than 0.6 ppm2?
You read in the results section of an article in a psychology journal that the results...
You read in the results section of an article in a psychology journal that the results of at-test for independent sample means revealed a significant t12 = 1.8, with σˆX1−X2 = 2. If there were 8 participants in the experimental group, (a) how many participants were in the corresponding control group? (b) what significance level was used, and was the test a one-tailed or a two-tailed test? (c) what was the mean difference between the experimental and the control groups?
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT